DSouth on the reason behind Skal's eligibility concerns:
"He withdrew from school because he disagreed with the coaching staff? And what was that disagreement, could it have been that the coaches at that school felt he needed to attend classes and he disagreed? You may not need to know but pretty sure the NCAA needs to understand that disagreement.
My point is you are being just as subjective assuming it was athletically based as in we should play man rather than zone. Matter of fact and not being subjective, I find it more likely that the disagreement was more classroom related."
He calls a guy subjective for assuming that Skal's issues with eligibility are not related to academics. Then DSouth says he's not being subjective when he states that it is "more likely" related to acaedmics. What?
I don't think DSouth understands what subjective means.
Also, this article from nearly a year ago points out that the issues are not related to academics:
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-ba...ucky-tennessee-reach-your-dream-prep-calipari