I don't know about y'all, but two teams I was really impressed by yesterday were Cinncy and NW. One might assume that they just must have better players. Not necessarily so. Having retired this year and with nothing to do right now, I took a look at Rivals' average star ratings for their recruits compared to ours over the last 5 years. This is what I found: 2017 - Duke 2.91, Cinncy 2.73, NW 2.84; 2018 - Duke 3.00, Cinncy 2.91, NW 2.94; 2019 - Duke 2.91, Cinncy 2.58, NW 2.95; 2020 - Duke 2.88, Cinncy 2.95 , NW 3.06; 2021 - Duke 2.83, Cinncy 2.68, NW 3.07. It boggles my mind that Duke has recruited better players than Cinncy every year but one and that Duke is not that far below NW. Cinncy played UGA even, and NW beat the crap out of Auburn. I do not know how much of Cinncy's and NW's success yesterday, if any, was attributable to transfers; but most of the huge gap which exists between their football programs and Duke's, in my mind, results primarily from clearly inferior coaching and not from recruiting.
OFC