To be fair. That percentage is up from last month.The .266 three-point shooting percentage says hello back.
#DropsMic
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To be fair. That percentage is up from last month.The .266 three-point shooting percentage says hello back.
#DropsMic
I have been pretty critical of Duvall on the CBB, but this board makes me look reasonable. Haha.
Fair enough.Dude, you've seemed REALLY in the dumps on the main board Admittedly, we've had some TOUGH, tough moments, compared to what we've expected.
I have tough moments; I tend to vent at my TV... and at my couch... and at the wall...
Speaking of main board, I can’t post on there anymore. Do you know why by chance?Dude, you've seemed REALLY in the dumps on the main board Admittedly, we've had some TOUGH, tough moments, compared to what we've expected.
I have tough moments; I tend to vent at my TV... and at my couch... and at the wall...
Grayson is our senior leader and should bear the brunt of the criticism. That is an absolute fact and this team will go as far as he takes them, not Duvall.As fans, I think it's completely fair to critique a Duke player, whether he's a freshman or a senior. What bothers me (and probably most posters on here), is how the critique is given. Saying: Tatum sucks, Tatum should go back to STL, please bench Tatum (all of these things were said last year)....all of these are stupid and give absolutely zero substance. Plus they are embarrassing to read.
Now saying: Tatum really doesn't have his legs yet, he's really hurting us because he can't explode to the basket (things along these lines) are completely fair and good criticism.
Exact same goes for Duval (Gary was our scapegoat up until Duval a couple weeks ago, I'm amazed it's never been Grayson, but let's save that conversation for another time).
"Bench Duval" "We are better without Duval"- again, completely ignorant and gives zero substance. Let me read about how Duval had the lowest plus/minus of any player in the GT game to prove a point. Even though he did have the highest in the UNC game.
It's fair to criticize Duval, but the way he is criticized by certain posters speaks volumes to the type of person you probably are. I said all last week that Duval should still start, and after watching Sunday, I'll admit that I was wrong. For the time being, he should come off the bench. But without him on the floor, there is a certain gear that won't be reached. We need him just as much as we need Bagley or Grayson if we wanna win #6.
Good post, but why is people suggesting Duval to be benched considered ignorant to you?As fans, I think it's completely fair to critique a Duke player, whether he's a freshman or a senior. What bothers me (and probably most posters on here), is how the critique is given. Saying: Tatum sucks, Tatum should go back to STL, please bench Tatum (all of these things were said last year)....all of these are stupid and give absolutely zero substance. Plus they are embarrassing to read.
Now saying: Tatum really doesn't have his legs yet, he's really hurting us because he can't explode to the basket (things along these lines) are completely fair and good criticism.
Exact same goes for Duval (Gary was our scapegoat up until Duval a couple weeks ago, I'm amazed it's never been Grayson, but let's save that conversation for another time).
"Bench Duval" "We are better without Duval"- again, completely ignorant and gives zero substance. Let me read about how Duval had the lowest plus/minus of any player in the GT game to prove a point. Even though he did have the highest in the UNC game.
It's fair to criticize Duval, but the way he is criticized by certain posters speaks volumes to the type of person you probably are. I said all last week that Duval should still start, and after watching Sunday, I'll admit that I was wrong. For the time being, he should come off the bench. But without him on the floor, there is a certain gear that won't be reached. We need him just as much as we need Bagley or Grayson if we wanna win #6.
26-27% from 3 is simply bad. Duval is a bad shooter. Nothing wrong with noting that fact or having light-hearted fun with it! Maybe he'll improve, maybe he won't.
Speaking of main board, I can’t post on there anymore. Do you know why by chance?
You can't? That's strange. I'd message a mod and see if they can help?
Wait, is it something where it says you've reached a limit? That you can fix. Lemme know if that is it.
http://www.dukechronicle.com/article/2018/02/why-alex-oconnell-may-provide-a-lineup-upgrade
Hard to argue much of this article...
http://www.dukechronicle.com/article/2018/02/why-alex-oconnell-may-provide-a-lineup-upgrade
Hard to argue much of this article...
“Duval needs to sit on the bench”- without any substance or explanation? Yeah that’s stupid and ignorant.Good post, but why is people suggesting Duval to be benched considered ignorant to you?
“Duval needs to sit on the bench”- without any substance or explanation? Yeah that’s stupid and ignorant.
The entire article is pretty descriptive as to why....
The two biggest obstacles that need solved with him on the floor are...
1) opponents don’t leave Grayson and Duvals man often is the sagger because he’s no threat offensively....Also hinders Allen’s driving ability...and thus free throw attempts....
I would also argue it makes life much harder for Bagley and Carter with Duvald man digging down...
2) He turns the ball over way to much...leading into many empty possessions and easy transition pts for the opposing team...
Those two things need solved IMO...with him on the floor leaves us basically with three non shooters and a turn over machine...it’s why Allen can’t get going....
Yea it says I have reached a limit. Been like that for days!!You can't? That's strange. I'd message a mod and see if they can help?
Wait, is it something where it says you've reached a limit? That you can fix. Lemme know if that is it.
Perhaps. I feel like Allen getting into a consistent flow and adding another shooter to the regular rotation will play a bigger role.If Duke is to go anywhere in March Duval will be perhaps the biggest reason they do.
That's a fact.
I read some post don’t bash kids but the last couple of past haven’t been about Duval mainly it’s sounds like a DI royal rumble lol
I have a feeling the author of that article would get ridiculed by this board. Haha.http://www.dukechronicle.com/article/2018/02/why-alex-oconnell-may-provide-a-lineup-upgrade
Hard to argue much of this article...
I’m able to make sense of your point. And I agree, our offense is definitely easier to guard at the moment with Duval on the floor. Grayson is serviceable to handle the ball while Duval figures it out from the bench, but we aren’t winning a title with him being the point guard, we need him scoring at least 20.Mmm...messed that Reply up on my phone...
I have that message what do you do?
I'm going to regret this...
https://forums.rivals.com/threads/post-here-and-tag-a-mod-if-still-having-posting-issues.659759/
Post here, they can remove that.
"As a free user, there is a limit to how many messages you can post at once. Please wait a while and try again or pay for a subscription!"
Still get that on that thread too. And come on you know you like me some
Most posters on this board, if you give them a chance, will explain their position and why they feel the way they feel.“Duval needs to sit on the bench”- without any substance or explanation? Yeah that’s stupid and ignorant.
“Duval is really killing us right now, his shooting is poor, and he’s turning it over too much, he should come off the bench” -Completely fair.
Not attacking you at all, but is this concept difficult to understand?
Most posters on this board, if you give them a chance, will explain their position and why they feel the way they feel.
Personally I feel it’s the posters who think they know better than everybody else that are aggravating. We all just watch the games. That’s all we have to go on. Give me the poster who is on here to be a fan, not the poster who is on here to prove he is the smartest guy in the room.
Good point Dude. My thing is, is that it’s the internet and people are people. They’re gonna say crazy things sometimes. We all are gonna say crazy things sometimes.Sure, but I think there is also the issue of some posters not being emotional rollercoaster types and they approach things pretty consistently. Then, when they call out someone for an emotional response and reference things like "The coaching staff spends their entire lives working on this, and they have like a hundred years of experience" the person who is getting called out gets their dander up and it becomes a thing. Given how many emotional responses happen here (several dozen per game thread?) and for how many years its been going on, I think some irritation is to be expected.
82 games vs 31. 7 game series in the post season vs single game elimination.If the Golden State Warriors can lose 13 games, and nobody is panicking... Why is the sky always falling when Duke loses. People just need to relax, this will all work out!
And if not, there's always golf.
As fans, I think it's completely fair to critique a Duke player, whether he's a freshman or a senior. What bothers me (and probably most posters on here), is how the critique is given. Saying: Tatum sucks, Tatum should go back to STL, please bench Tatum (all of these things were said last year)....all of these are stupid and give absolutely zero substance. Plus they are embarrassing to read.
Now saying: Tatum really doesn't have his legs yet, he's really hurting us because he can't explode to the basket (things along these lines) are completely fair and good criticism.
Exact same goes for Duval (Gary was our scapegoat up until Duval a couple weeks ago, I'm amazed it's never been Grayson, but let's save that conversation for another time).
"Bench Duval" "We are better without Duval"- again, completely ignorant and gives zero substance. Let me read about how Duval had the lowest plus/minus of any player in the GT game to prove a point. Even though he did have the highest in the UNC game.
It's fair to criticize Duval, but the way he is criticized by certain posters speaks volumes to the type of person you probably are. I said all last week that Duval should still start, and after watching Sunday, I'll admit that I was wrong. For the time being, he should come off the bench. But without him on the floor, there is a certain gear that won't be reached. We need him just as much as we need Bagley or Grayson if we wanna win #6.