The Navy released the statement, no? I don’t have sources, the internet? But don't you think there should be sources listed when making such a claim as the Atlantic made?
I must have misheard who the donor was. I thought they said the editor was who held fundraisers and donated to the campaign. Important to be correct, my apologies.
Nothing should disqualify the truth no matter who donates to who. But you should absolutely question the motives behind running high profile stories using anonymous sources. Especially today when "journalists" are more activists for the democrats than they are journalists.
Question. How can a reporter back up another reporter's story? Neither one were their and neither one will name sources. With all of the garbage the media has already been wrong about, people still take them at their word. As long as it muddies the waters, right? It's a game all politicians play, it's just that now one party has the unwavering support of the msm.