The president of the University of Maryland made a statement that UNC getting the 'death penalty' would be appropriate.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...t-wallace-loh-unc-academic-scandal/100317350/
As a Duke fan, I give that a moment of thought -- would that be good for college basketball? Would that be good for Duke?
I grew up in Dallas and remember the SMU death penalty. It killed SMU's athletics, and it has never really recovered.
I think UNC did something wrong (really wrong), but a death penalty is basically a scorched-earth policy. I sincerely believe that Duke's success in basketball is tied very closely with UNC's. In the long run a severe penalty will end up hurting the ACC, Duke, and college basketball. Call me self-serving, but a punishment against the Tar Heels that is too severe does not help Duke.
Any thoughts out there (like I have to ask)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...t-wallace-loh-unc-academic-scandal/100317350/
As a Duke fan, I give that a moment of thought -- would that be good for college basketball? Would that be good for Duke?
I grew up in Dallas and remember the SMU death penalty. It killed SMU's athletics, and it has never really recovered.
I think UNC did something wrong (really wrong), but a death penalty is basically a scorched-earth policy. I sincerely believe that Duke's success in basketball is tied very closely with UNC's. In the long run a severe penalty will end up hurting the ACC, Duke, and college basketball. Call me self-serving, but a punishment against the Tar Heels that is too severe does not help Duke.
Any thoughts out there (like I have to ask)