Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of the guys responding to Ted's tweet said it's fake. I found it on their athletics website in less than 30 seconds via Google.
Hilarious summation of the scandal from the UNC perspective.
Looks like unx's legal posturing to have Sankey removed didn't work. It's funny. The holes claim the SEC guy has a conflict of interest. Interesting. They've never made such objections while one of their former athletes/alums was the ACC commish...
AP Exclusive: SEC's Sankey refuses to step down in UNC case
Sankey stated in an April 14 letter obtained by The Associated Press that the panel would "fairly decide this case."
"The panel, including me, will hear and decide this case based on the case record and the membership's bylaws," Sankey wrote to all involved parties.
The NCAA Committee on Infractions issued a statement Friday to the AP on Friday saying that "committee composition is appropriate."
AUGUST...
Sankey responded that Crowder's interview should occur in coming weeks within the new schedule, adding: "There will be no further delays, and the case will be heard on this schedule."
Sankey's letter also details a new timetable of completion for the oft-delayed case. UNC must respond to the latest charges by May 16. The NCAA enforcement staff then has until July 17 for its own response. Sankey wrote that his panel will hear the case in August with "anticipated" dates of Aug. 16 and 17.
In an email to the AP, UNC spokeswoman Joanne Peters said the school will make its case to the panel according to the NCAA's schedule.
This next bit is hilarious AND about time someone close to the case said it publicly. Sankey pointed out unx's delay tactics THEN called 'em "liars." Which they are...
Sankey also referenced "misstatements of facts" in Abrams' letters while reiterating investigation details must remain confidential.
"Rules put in place and supported by our membership call for confidentiality in infractions cases and the continued leaks of partial and inaccurate information in this case are disappointing," the committee stated.
http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/college/acc/unc/article145970734.html
unx doesn't even want this to be HEARD by the COI. Makes sense. They have no logical rationalizations for any of it. The PR babble they serve to the Tarhole Nation is one thing. Facing the truth is another. Crazy. They coulda got a wrist-slap ages ago and had this way behind 'em by now. Heck , I STILL claim they receive nowhere NEAR justified sanctions but judging by his statements , Sankey's about had it with unx. Can't say I blame 'im.
The word is unc wants him replaced by someone that has no conflict of interest and strongly suggested john swofford. OFC
I am sure they would have no problem w/Big 10 czar Jim Delaney....
#GTHCGTH
OFC
wonder what new stall tactic UNC will pull this time to delay the proceedsngs further
Another million or so can probably change thatAccording to the Sankey story linked earlier , there won't be any more delays.
Another million or so can probably change that