Do you consider explicit content on sucking dick to be pornographic material?There are already clear laws regulating porn with the goal of keeping it out of the hands of minors. That's not the discussion and I have no issue with those laws.
How about just one book? Oedipus Rex. The protagonist murders his father, marries his mother, and has 4 kids with her. Kids are a by-product of sex. And he was doing it with his own mom. The entire play is about discovering this. Should we ban it?
Just because you consider "activist" a negative thing doesn't mean I do. In fact, it's a pretty safe bet that a politically charged word you have a negative opinion of is one I have a positive opinion of. And I think it's a terrible idea for that 11-year-old to read that book, based on what I know of him and his father from a single YouTube video. I never supported that at all.
Not answering
I don't think activism is automatically a negative thing. But I think you were attempting to cast it as an insult in this case. What makes him an activist? Why refer to him as an activist instead of just an 11 year old who was subjected to content that has no business in his school library?
So back to the book in question... have any of you paused to wonder why a school librarian would choose to include a book like that in their collection? Because if all you can come up with is grooming or sheer evil, you're just stupid snowflakes. Anyone want to try to represent what an actual librarian might say? You don't have to endorse it. I just want to know if any of y'all are even willing to hear it.
You keep trying to justify dick sucking content for middle schoolers. Whatever man.