So when you said it was only us who were clutching our pearls, which we weren't, you were just being a dishonest asshole who didn't know what they were talking about? That's fair.
The New Lounge
- Thread starter hpnole
- Start date
As someone who is a caregiver for a loved one that has a traumatic brain injury. I can tell you first hand that they don't give two F's about mental health. The entire system is devoid of responsible, caring help. It's very sad Ghost.
I also do not want to diminish the "individuals" within that system who do care and are trying to make a difference. They're not only fighting for that population and fighting against the corrupt system at the same time. God Bless those people!
The main reason why though? There's no money in it.
It's pretty hilarious that the guy who supports the biggest pearl clutchers of all time would even accuse anyone else of fake outrage.
Look at this lunatic, and then he goes on to the fake outrage of muh January 6th.
Look at this lunatic, and then he goes on to the fake outrage of muh January 6th.
Last edited:
Do you see that little italicized word before the question mark in my original above? I repeated it, without italics, in the very next sentence.
Do you need me to explain how that single word modifies what you're claiming I said?
I don't know what book that is your little hero activist is reading from (and neither do any of you), but I suspect it's Gender Queer. Here's a little more info on it from a blogger who is analytical without y'all's over-emoting.
You're lying either way. I never came close to expressing outrage. Real or fake.
I didn't accuse you of supporting MSNBC. You support the same people who MSNBC supports. And those are the people I am talking about. You and Joe are two peas in a pod.
Keep white knighting for the people who put books in schools that depict boys giving boys blowjobs. You're just further exposing yourself as a sicko.
I never used the word outrage*. That I was factually not saying what you accused me of saying doesn't make me a liar.
You support the same people the Proud Boys support. You and the Proud Boys are two peas in a pod. Wow, this is a fun game.
You didn't read the link, did you? And you still don't know what book your little 11-year-old hero activist was reading from, huh? I figured it out. It's not Gender Queer after all. While you and others here were getting outraged over a book you don't even know the title of and accusing me of being on the pedo spectrum for not getting all worked up about it, I was doing actual work to find out more about it. You know, research I'm qualified to do, not just emoting.
(*It doesn't count that I used it later in the same post.)
What do you think pearl clutching means? Anyways, not important. You are lying here to serve your own feelings.
The proud boys aren't a network promoting political ideologies. Terrible comparison.
I don't need to know the title of the book. How stupid are you on this? Was the book depicting two boys sucking each other off, or not? What would make that acceptable for school aged children, let alone the title of the book?
What process would any of you recommend for removing a title from a school library? Is it about who can fingerbang their keyboard the hardest on teh intrawebz mEsSaGe BoArD? Or who can get the most hysterical while reading a saucy excerpt? Or should there be an actual policy designed to consider such matters free from emotion? And what is the appropriate timeframe for getting to the bottom of it all? Within minutes so that it will fit into a Fox News story that very evening?
Dramatic and emotional come to mind. Go ahead and call me a liar some more for accurately describing you in an unflattering way that you don't want to accept about yourself.
I'm not a TV network, either. Terrible comparison. I think the Proud Boys and other white nationalists are a great comparison to you. They support the same candidates you do, after all.
I'll give you a hint: The book title doesn't reference sex acts, either.
That's it? That's your process? Sorry to bust up your circle jerk of emotion, but actual adults have to make actual decisions about these sorts of things.
Yeah, the adults line doesn't work with you freaks. And you really want to talk about people being emotional. You wore a pussy hat to a protest and screamed at the sky.
Why is it that when you little boys can’t handle the man right in front of you you start projecting every behavior you’ve ever heard of onto that one person?
It's a good thing you have that opinion of yourself. Because I suspect "man" isn't what would come to mind with people who would be asked to describe you that know you. Plaid shirts with skinny jeans, crossed legs and your arms crossed sipping your latte from the backside of your hand. That's the kind of man I vision if I were to guess.
I tried to give you a little benefit. If not for the fact you're delusional, the dedication you show to your team is almost admirable.
I'm genuinely curious. What is your obsession with children reading sexually explicit books? I just can't understand how any sane adult would want children reading material like that.
Either he's as sick as those that allow these things to happen, or he just toes the company line like a good employee. I'd like to think his stance would change if the left ever got a brain and a heart.
It's beyond confusing and disgusting to me. I just wanted to give him a chance to respond. We'll see.
The Left is reactionary and contrarian at its core. If one us came on here touting Gender Queer as a ground breaking masterpiece, Datt would list all the ways it sucks ( no pun intended). They look to the Right to see what they’re for and against. And they like to undermine traditional values for the sake of appearing avant- garde and coffee shop hip. They’ve become caricatures of themselves.
If this is real (probably is), this is just another example of the mental illness that liberalism creates. Bless her father.
Hate to break it to you sister, but you’ve got bigger problems than worrying about who your dad’s voting for
Thinking others are caricatures is the very definition of a strawman, the safe space for intellectual cowards. I haven't offered the first opinion on Gender Queer. Y'all have a hard time wrapping your inflexible minds around that.
After all the schooling I've given you about critical thinking, you're still pretending your side is leading the charge when it comes to ideas? You think the Right conjured up the idea of transgenderism, then the Left waited to see your take on it before deciding to go the other way? Y'all were still hugging yourselves and rocking back and forth, chanting "Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve; Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve." 🤣
Ah the strawman is back. It’s been at least two days.
You’re prob right that the Right didn’t create transgenderism. Gender dysphoria and mental illness been around a long time. Can’t really create mental illness. You can encourage it, cultivate it even, like we see now, but you can’t really conjure it up.
Conjure? Did you learn that word on Halloween on your word a day calendar?
In a vacuum yes, the behavior can seem healthy. But in the context of Biden’s volumes of creepy, what the actual f— behavior, it’s hard not to be disturbed by the images
Dude, I can give you the freakin' etymology on "conjure": con, from Latin via French, means "with, same, together," just like in Spanish (another Romance language -- ie, derived from Latin, which the Romans used). Jur, as in jury or juror, means "to swear," also from Latin via French. So to conjure is to bring it into existence with a swear/spell.
Speaking of etymology, the word "conserve" means "with keep" (or "keep with," "keep same"). It's the root of
"conservative." WRT most environmental concerns, I'd consider myself a conservative, of sorts, because I'd like to keep it as much the same as possible. In the modern political sense, conservatives claim to stand for traditional family values -- ie, keeping things the same.
Which brings me back to your ridiculous claim that the Left makes up its mind by watching what the Right does first. When has keeping things the same ever led to change, let alone advancement?
You've never viewed anything he does in a vacuum. It is always filtered through bad faith.
Whatever, freak. Joe has a creepy and unhealthy attraction to young kids. There's nothing cute about it. How many hills are you going to die on?
Now he's a pedophile, too. 🤣 How do y'all keep up with all the lies you make up about others?
Yet another post disguised as a retort when its primary goal is to show us all how you smart you are.
Like most lost souls on the Left, you’re in desperate need of validation/ attention 24 hours a day . That’s probably why you went into education. You ran out of adults to annoy, so you had to move on to kids.
