We did catch a break seeding wise when Wisconsin lost. I guess we will find out tomorrow if we can capitalize. But at season's start I think we would all take beat JMU to get to the sweet 16.
Yes. If you would have told me at the beginning of the year Duke would be matched up a 12 seed in the 2nd round, I'd take that all day.you can say JMU is underseeded all day and that’s fine but they ARENT as good as a 8/9 seed which a 1 has to play. Duke should win and had an easier way to do it then all the 1 seeds
I agree, except for Michigan State. The holes got lucky playing one of the weaker Spartan teams Izzo has had.
That’s true hopefully they play like the lakers today thoughI agree, except for Michigan State. The holes got lucky playing one of the weaker Spartan teams Izzo has had.
ExactlyYes. If you would have told me at the beginning of the year Duke would be matched up a 12 seed in the 2nd round, I'd take that all day.
No one is saying JMU will be easy, they look solid, but they are a mid major for a reason.
Just my opinion but I don’t think there is anything wrong with having Leaders By Committee.
2010: Scheyer was the point guard, but can anyone say objectively he was more of a leader than Smith, Singler, Thomas, or Zoubek, that season? It seems like all 5 of them led in their own way throughout that tournament run.
2015: Cook and Jefferson were the Captains, but Tyus was a Leader on that team.
Just because multiple players fill The Leadership Role doesn’t make any of them any less of A Leader.
Bull,please note I said "PLAYER(S)" intangible when referring to on-court leadership. I see nothing wrong at all with "leadership by committee," provided its CONSISTENT. I haven't seen it from this group.Just my opinion but I don’t think there is anything wrong with having Leaders By Committee.
2010: Scheyer was the point guard, but can anyone say objectively he was more of a leader than Smith, Singler, Thomas, or Zoubek, that season? It seems like all 5 of them led in their own way throughout that tournament run.
2015: Cook and Jefferson were the Captains, but Tyus was a Leader on that team.
Just because multiple players fill The Leadership Role doesn’t make any of them any less of A Leader.
X2Seems like at least Proctor has the right mindset towards tomorrow night’s game against JMU. He said during his interview, “we need to be the aggressors all night and take care of business.”
Exactly what I like to hear!
All that talk Friday....15-4 run… they have that dawg in them
lol at people pointing to their OOC and SOS
Since when did that have anything to do with David taking down goliaths in the big dance 😂
You’re late, already accepted my crowAll that talk Friday....
They had the 312 SOS and you still don't think that means anything?
Just alot of talk Friday night for a 40 point win. JMU played ALOT of bad teams and this is why I wanted them as opposed to Wisconsin.You’re late, already accepted my crow
Nope still doesn’t mean anything. James Madison came out completely flat and we finally for the first time came out like the dogs we are. This isn’t the same effort that played against Vermont. And James Madison didn’t play like they did against wiscy either
St. Peter’s says hi…. They made an elite 8 run playing nobody if you recall 😉
Post of the daylol…you guys still want JMU? I’ve watched this team all year….they are dogs! Fast and in your face and can score like crazy.
They just played these first 7 min with more energy and toughness than Duke has shown the entire year.