ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

I get an embarrassing feeling having seen that...damn🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤷‍♂️
 
Pretty clear now that BLM is a terrorist organization. Two officers shot in Louisville tonight. Absolutely disgusting.
[/QUOTE]

Wow. Okay, the police officers being shot is obviously awful, but what did you honestly expect when that same police department, broke into Breonna Taylor's house and shot her for absolutely no reason. The same police department that was mostly acquitted earlier in the day. Wanton endangerment? For one officer? That's not justice, that's saying you don't really care at all what your officers do and you want to save some face.

Again, shooting officers is clearly not the way, it's wrong and those who committed the crime should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. But that's the crux of the issue and the reason why we need protests and BLM, you will prosecute and throw the book at those who commit crimes against police, but won't do the same to the when they commit the exact same crime.
 
Pretty clear now that BLM is a terrorist organization. Two officers shot in Louisville tonight. Absolutely disgusting.

Wow. Okay, the police officers being shot is obviously awful, but what did you honestly expect when that same police department, broke into Breonna Taylor's house and shot her for absolutely no reason. The same police department that was mostly acquitted earlier in the day. Wanton endangerment? For one officer? That's not justice, that's saying you don't really care at all what your officers do and you want to save some face.

Again, shooting officers is clearly not the way, it's wrong and those who committed the crime should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. But that's the crux of the issue and the reason why we need protests and BLM, you will prosecute and throw the book at those who commit crimes against police, but won't do the same to the when they commit the exact same crime.
[/QUOTE]
According to witnesses the police announced their entry while executing a lawful warrant and were shot at with one officer wounded.What would you do if someone shot at you.What happened to Ms Taylor is horrible but saying the police went there with malice is ludricrous.
 
Wow. Okay, the police officers being shot is obviously awful, but what did you honestly expect when that same police department, broke into Breonna Taylor's house and shot her for absolutely no reason. The same police department that was mostly acquitted earlier in the day. Wanton endangerment? For one officer? That's not justice, that's saying you don't really care at all what your officers do and you want to save some face.

Again, shooting officers is clearly not the way, it's wrong and those who committed the crime should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. But that's the crux of the issue and the reason why we need protests and BLM, you will prosecute and throw the book at those who commit crimes against police, but won't do the same to the when they commit the exact same crime.
According to witnesses the police announced their entry while executing a lawful warrant and were shot at with one officer wounded.What would you do if someone shot at you.What happened to Ms Taylor is horrible but saying the police went there with malice is ludricrous.
[/QUOTE]
One witness said they knocked and announced, another 11 said otherwise. Doesn't matter as police had no reason to be there. Her boyfriend went to defend them and those PoS cops fired 20 shots, killing her and injuring her boyfriend. But go ahead continue licking the boot. ****ing idiot.
 
One witness said they knocked and announced, another 11 said otherwise. Doesn't matter as police had no reason to be there. Her boyfriend went to defend them and those PoS cops fired 20 shots, killing her and injuring her boyfriend. But go ahead continue licking the boot. ****ing idiot.
You are a huge problem in today's society. Link to these other 11 witnesses?

You clearly have no clue about the actual facts of the case and want to join the crowd who takes the side of the mob over the law regardless of facts. One, you said in an earlier post that they broke into her apartment and just shot her. That is a blatant lie and misrepresentation of what actually happened. They didn't break into her apartment, they were serving a lawful warrant. They didn't just shoot her. They returned fire after her boyfriend shot an officer and unfortunately, she was caught in the crossfire. You say they had no reason to be there. This is further evidence that you didn't even take the time to educate yourself on the facts of the case. They have video evidence of packages being delivered to her home and her ex boyfriend (the drug dealer) picking them up. They have testimony from the ex boyfriend that says he used her apartment with her permission to keep money. (Drug money) Though she didn't need to die, and it is terrible that she did, she took part in a drug dealing scheme that led to the police obtaining the warrant to begin with. So, yeah. They had reason to be there.

I always find it sad that people like you don't even understand the basic workings of a grand jury and think that your uneducated opinion on cases like this should hold merit over that of 36 people who have been presented with evidence and testimony uncut and uncensored in order to determine whether or not the case warrants charges. 12 people out of 36 have to say that they saw enough evidence to warrant charges. That didn't happen here. We're not talking about convicting anyone, we're just talking about being charged. And yet, you know more about the case than those 36 people and you demand more.

Do yourself a favor. Next time you call someone an idiot, make sure that you don’t look like one yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821


The guy tweeting?

ONE OF TRUMPS OWN TOP GUYS IN HOMELAND SECURITY.

So won’t commit to a peaceful transfer of power, and then suggests throwing out votes. This, after doing everything he can legally to block ballots from being counted, and talking about the need for a SCOTUS justice to make sure the election is taken care of. Can you imagine if this was a Democrat? The same people who suck this guys dick would literally be marching on the capitol with guns... I mean, all it took was telling these ****heads to wear a mask during a pandemic and they did that.
 
Last edited:
TtCA0e2.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821


The guy tweeting?

ONE OF TRUMPS OWN TOP GUYS IN HOMELAND SECURITY.

So won’t commit to a peaceful transfer of power, and then suggests throwing out votes. This, after doing everything he can legally to block ballots from being counted, and talking about the need for a SCOTUS justice to make sure the election is taken care of. Can you imagine if this was a Democrat? The same people who suck this guys dick would literally be marching on the capitol with guns... I mean, all it took was telling these ****heads to wear a mask during a pandemic and they did that.
This is rich coming from the guy who supported the last NON peaceful transfer of power. We now know without question Trump and his team were illegally spies upon and you and the other sheep libs bought into it hook, line and sinker. Not to mention, I didn’t see a word from you or the other libs here crying about Hillary telling Joe Biden to NOT concede under any circumstance.

Spare me the faux outrage. You just look more disingenuous than normal and less intelligent (hard to do).
 
  • Like
Reactions: GhostOf301
This is rich coming from the guy who supported the last NON peaceful transfer of power. We now know without question Trump and his team were illegally spies upon and you and the other sheep libs bought into it hook, line and sinker. Not to mention, I didn’t see a word from you or the other libs here crying about Hillary telling Joe Biden to NOT concede under any circumstance.

Spare me the faux outrage. You just look more disingenuous than normal and less intelligent (hard to do).
It is nuts how selective people are with their outrage. The OMG crowd will be unbearable come November.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
You are a huge problem in today's society. Link to these other 11 witnesses?

You clearly have no clue about the actual facts of the case and want to join the crowd who takes the side of the mob over the law regardless of facts. One, you said in an earlier post that they broke into her apartment and just shot her. That is a blatant lie and misrepresentation of what actually happened. They didn't break into her apartment, they were serving a lawful warrant. They didn't just shoot her. They returned fire after her boyfriend shot an officer and unfortunately, she was caught in the crossfire. You say they had no reason to be there. This is further evidence that you didn't even take the time to educate yourself on the facts of the case. They have video evidence of packages being delivered to her home and her ex boyfriend (the drug dealer) picking them up. They have testimony from the ex boyfriend that says he used her apartment with her permission to keep money. (Drug money) Though she didn't need to die, and it is terrible that she did, she took part in a drug dealing scheme that led to the police obtaining the warrant to begin with. So, yeah. They had reason to be there.

I always find it sad that people like you don't even understand the basic workings of a grand jury and think that your uneducated opinion on cases like this should hold merit over that of 36 people who have been presented with evidence and testimony uncut and uncensored in order to determine whether or not the case warrants charges. 12 people out of 36 have to say that they saw enough evidence to warrant charges. That didn't happen here. We're not talking about convicting anyone, we're just talking about being charged. And yet, you know more about the case than those 36 people and you demand more.

Do yourself a favor. Next time you call someone an idiot, make sure that you don’t look like one yourself.
How about you do some research bud? The post office investigated and concluded that no packages of interest were going to her residence. Yes, her ex boyfriend was a dealer but, why should police have the right to ram (yes they used a battering ram) through her door in the middle of the night if nothing was going there? And why go at night when most are asleep?

Then naturally spooked at having someone tear his ****ing door down in the middle of the night he armed himself with his legal firearm and acted in self defense. His reward? A trip to the hospital and a dead girlfriend. I would also like to point out that she was shot 5 times, and some of the officers fired through windows covered by blinds, which is illegal.

They may not have went there with malice in their hearts, but they did go with complete and utter disregard for the human lives within, and committed murder. They should be charged as such. If you cannot see that then you are willingly turning a blind eye to the murder of a fellow citizen and that, is Un-****ing-American.

Nice try to disregard my comment as uneducated though. Why don't you and your ilk and your supreme leader, dear Donald Trump pack the **** up and leave this country if you don't like the way it's headed? Go to Antarctica, there you can use DJT'S balls as snorkels to swim in the sea of his ass and not get judged. Snowflake.
 
This is rich coming from the guy who supported the last NON peaceful transfer of power. We now know without question Trump and his team were illegally spies upon and you and the other sheep libs bought into it hook, line and sinker. Not to mention, I didn’t see a word from you or the other libs here crying about Hillary telling Joe Biden to NOT concede under any circumstance.

Spare me the faux outrage. You just look more disingenuous than normal and less intelligent (hard to do).
Hillary told him not to concede because it's painfully obvious Biden is gonna ass slap Trump in terms of votes, and doesn't want Trump trying to steal Biden's rightful place. Because as TheDude pointed out, Trump is absolutely gonna try.
 


The guy tweeting?

ONE OF TRUMPS OWN TOP GUYS IN HOMELAND SECURITY.

So won’t commit to a peaceful transfer of power, and then suggests throwing out votes. This, after doing everything he can legally to block ballots from being counted, and talking about the need for a SCOTUS justice to make sure the election is taken care of. Can you imagine if this was a Democrat? The same people who suck this guys dick would literally be marching on the capitol with guns... I mean, all it took was telling these ****heads to wear a mask during a pandemic and they did that.
People are gonna march once he loses. Straight up to Washington to defend dear Leader.
 
How about you do some research bud? The post office investigated and concluded that no packages of interest were going to her residence. Yes, her ex boyfriend was a dealer but, why should police have the right to ram (yes they used a battering ram) through her door in the middle of the night if nothing was going there? And why go at night when most are asleep?

Then naturally spooked at having someone tear his ****ing door down in the middle of the night he armed himself with his legal firearm and acted in self defense. His reward? A trip to the hospital and a dead girlfriend. I would also like to point out that she was shot 5 times, and some of the officers fired through windows covered by blinds, which is illegal.

They may not have went there with malice in their hearts, but they did go with complete and utter disregard for the human lives within, and committed murder. They should be charged as such. If you cannot see that then you are willingly turning a blind eye to the murder of a fellow citizen and that, is Un-****ing-American.

Nice try to disregard my comment as uneducated though. Why don't you and your ilk and your supreme leader, dear Donald Trump pack the **** up and leave this country if you don't like the way it's headed? Go to Antarctica, there you can use DJT'S balls as snorkels to swim in the sea of his ass and not get judged. Snowflake.
Doubling down with more ignorance and lies. Lol at the post office investigation. Haha. Oh wow. Again. 36 civilians were presented all of the evidence and not even 12 of them saw enough evidence to even warrant charges. But YOU. YOU think you know more about it than they do. What a clown.
 
Doubling down with more ignorance and lies. Lol at the post office investigation. Haha. Oh wow. Again. 36 civilians were presented all of the evidence and not even 12 of them saw enough evidence to even warrant charges. But YOU. YOU think you know more about it than they do. What a clown.
No where did I lie. The only thing I'm doubling down on is common sense and basic human decency. Both of which you lack.
 
No where did I lie. The only thing I'm doubling down on is common sense and basic human decency. Both of which you lack.
Yeah, you are lying about 11 witnesses and the post office investigation. Haha. Anyways, read this. It has transcripts from jailhouse phone conversations and information regarding the packages that were being dropped off at her place where the ex boyfriend was picking them up. Oh, and they have pictures of Taylor, herself at the drug house where her ex was dealing the drugs that he picked up from her home. This is some of the evidence that was presented to the grand jury. Not that facts matter to you.



Don't get triggered by the site.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SNU0821
Yeah, you are lying about 11 witnesses and the post office investigation. Haha. Anyways, read this. It has transcripts from jailhouse phone conversations and information regarding the packages that were being dropped off at her place where the ex boyfriend was picking them up. Oh, and they have pictures of Taylor, herself at the drug house where her ex was dealing the drugs that he picked up from her home. This is some of the evidence that was presented to the grand jury. Not that facts matter to you.



Don't get triggered by the site.
So you're argument is what? She was involved in drugs and she deserved it?


11 witnesses is in the third paragraph under the Shooting section was reported by the New York Times https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Breonna_Taylor

Facts do matter to me. Clearly more than they do to you. And even if she was involved at some point in drugs (seems she was) that still does not mean you can murder someone (it was a murder, no two ways about it) and get away with it.

It was murder, and attempted murder. They should be charged. Sorry you don't believe justice should be blind.
 
How about you do some research bud? The post office investigated and concluded that no packages of interest were going to her residence. Yes, her ex boyfriend was a dealer but, why should police have the right to ram (yes they used a battering ram) through her door in the middle of the night if nothing was going there? And why go at night when most are asleep?

Then naturally spooked at having someone tear his ****ing door down in the middle of the night he armed himself with his legal firearm and acted in self defense. His reward? A trip to the hospital and a dead girlfriend. I would also like to point out that she was shot 5 times, and some of the officers fired through windows covered by blinds, which is illegal.

They may not have went there with malice in their hearts, but they did go with complete and utter disregard for the human lives within, and committed murder. They should be charged as such. If you cannot see that then you are willingly turning a blind eye to the murder of a fellow citizen and that, is Un-****ing-American.

Nice try to disregard my comment as uneducated though. Why don't you and your ilk and your supreme leader, dear Donald Trump pack the **** up and leave this country if you don't like the way it's headed? Go to Antarctica, there you can use DJT'S balls as snorkels to swim in the sea of his ass and not get judged. Snowflake.
Lol. Disregard for human life? And actually they were just found to NOT have committed murder by a grand jury made of with a large percentage of Black Americans.

This is the type of thought process we get when liberals choose to not think rationally or critically and just take everything that CNN, MSNBC and other social media outlets write.

“Mob justice is not justice” as the AG for Kentucky stated so well. But it’s also clear that BLM doesn’t care about the rule of law. They don’t care that a grand jury of citizens found the officers acted within the law (mostly). They’re a flat out terrorist organization now.
 
Lol. Democrats don't burn cities. Idiots do. That's something both sides condemn you lying **** wad.
Who do those idiots side with? Democrats. The liberal Democrats hasn’t done a thing to stop rioting, looting and destruction. Republicans have.

ONLY Democrats have burned cities lately. No conservatives or Republicans are out there burning down cities because we don’t get our way.
 
You're doubling down on white supremacy and fascism. **** Republicans. You're all ****ing idiots.
Lol. Someone is rustled. I bet you totally believed the Hands Up Don’t Shoot like from Mike Brown too, huh? 100% you bought into that fully.

Jesus. Idiots like you make me sad. But then again, you probably work at McDonalds serving fries or you’re unemployed leaching off the government because based on your posts here, that’s about the extent of your intelligence.
 
So you're argument is what? She was involved in drugs and she deserved it?


11 witnesses is in the third paragraph under the Shooting section was reported by the New York Times https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Breonna_Taylor

Facts do matter to me. Clearly more than they do to you. And even if she was involved at some point in drugs (seems she was) that still does not mean you can murder someone (it was a murder, no two ways about it) and get away with it.

It was murder, and attempted murder. They should be charged. Sorry you don't believe justice should be blind.
If it was murder and attempted murder, why did a grand jury made up of civilians that were largely black Americans, find the officers NOT guilty?

Sometimes you just can’t fix stupid....
 
Lol. Someone is rustled. I bet you totally believed the Hands Up Don’t Shoot like from Mike Brown too, huh? 100% you bought into that fully.

Jesus. Idiots like you make me sad. But then again, you probably work at McDonalds serving fries or you’re unemployed leaching off the government because based on your posts here, that’s about the extent of your intelligence.
When you can't attack the persons argument, attack their employment. Classic Repub here.
 
Lol. Disregard for human life? And actually they were just found to NOT have committed murder by a grand jury made of with a large percentage of Black Americans.

This is the type of thought process we get when liberals choose to not think rationally or critically and just take everything that CNN, MSNBC and other social media outlets write.

“Mob justice is not justice” as the AG for Kentucky stated so well. But it’s also clear that BLM doesn’t care about the rule of law. They don’t care that a grand jury of citizens found the officers acted within the law (mostly). They’re a flat out terrorist organization now.
Republican is spelled R. E. P. U. B. L. I. C. A. N. Not BLM. I know you're not very bright but damn, did you even finish elementary?
 
When you can't attack the persons argument, attack their employment. Classic Repub here.
You have no argument. What you’ve posted here isn’t true. The cops were rightfully found not to have been in the wrong for what they did.

The only thing that is classic is an idiot liberal ignoring the law and actual facts of the case because his feels were all hurt.
 
Who do those idiots side with? Democrats. The liberal Democrats hasn’t done a thing to stop rioting, looting and destruction. Republicans have.

ONLY Democrats have burned cities lately. No conservatives or Republicans are out there burning down cities because we don’t get our way.
So ignore the MAGA attack on Portland? Rednecks lighting people up from their pick ups?
 
Republican is spelled R. E. P. U. B. L. I. C. A. N. Not BLM. I know you're not very bright but damn, did you even finish elementary?
How excited do you think the cops were that they were rightfully found to have acted within the law? I bet they were relieved and excited. I’m happy for them.
 
You have no argument. What you’ve posted here isn’t true. The cops were rightfully found not to have been in the wrong for what they did.

The only thing that is classic is an idiot liberal ignoring the law and actual facts of the case because his feels were all hurt.
To the contrary I'm the only one of the three of us with a coherent argument. Sometimes, the law is wrong. In this particular case it never attempted to approach being right.
 
So ignore the MAGA attack on Portland? Rednecks lighting people up from their pick ups?
Wait. What? Lol. Those aren't Republicans in Portland causing all the destruction and continuous protests/riots. And cool. You found one example. I can go out and grab hundreds of examples from just the last couple of months from liberals and Democrats actively attacking officers and the rule of law.

Poor lib. You may not survive the next four years if/when Trump gets re-elected. LOL!
 
How excited do you think the cops were that they were rightfully found to have acted within the law? I bet they were relieved and excited. I’m happy for them.
How does it feel to be a fan of a team whose coach apparently supports a terrorist organization? Is Coach K a liberal idiot too?
 
To the contrary I'm the only one of the three of us with a coherent argument. Sometimes, the law is wrong. In this particular case it never attempted to approach being right.
Hahahahahahahahaha. Like I said, you can't fix stupid.

So you're saying the grand jury was incorrect in their decisions? Why? What do you know that they don't?
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT