In terms of what Sheed did or didn't do, there's no point in discussing it because only him and the two girls know.
In terms of how Duke handled it, I guess the anonymous source wanted him dismissed from the program earlier. I guess that's fair, but if the accusers refuse to file a complaint with the school and refuse to go to the police, how are you supposed to respond. Its a dangerous precedent to set when you start punishing people based only on rumors.
Everyone on here if basing this merely off of the article. People are now going around and saying that since the staff knew of these rumors in March 2014, they should have immediately dismissed him. If the article is factual, K was under no obligation to dismiss him. Rumors are just that: rumors, until they aren't. if the accusers are unwilling to take any action, what are you supposed to do?Originally posted by GTHC, GTH!:
The most important thing for us, as fans, is to not start sounding like UNC fans with their school wide academic fraud case. They still don't acknowledge wrong doing and won't listen to the facts as they come out. Look, if Sheed did, he deserves to go to prison. Getting rid of him is the right thing to do. And yes, we need to let evidence and all that to come out, but we have to embrace that this actually a big deal and that we support the truth and for the responsible parties to actual admit responsibility and do things accordingly. They still don't do that in Chapel Hill.
Thats all true, but as it stands right now, based only off of that article, this doesn't look to be some sort of institutional cover-up. NOT YET, AT LEAST. My prediction, however, is that the media will run with this article today as a means to implicate K and the program. Based only off of this article, there's nothing in there to justify that.Originally posted by GTHC, GTH!:
I am not saying that they should or shouldn't have done anything last year. I am not worried about all of that right now because we need for to come out first. I just want us as a fan base to be the opposite of UNC fans and their blind belief that they have done nothing wrong. We are here to support the truth, to want the truth and to judge accordingly. Not to let the facts come out and still act like nothing happened.
I agree....Id imagine the due diligence was started and the accusers not coming forward didn't help matters. Also it seems K's superiors knew the accusations and I'd imagine where investigating and reporting back to K where things stood. It seems they gathered information, the accusers started to come forward and it became clear that actions needed to be taken. I think getting kicked off the team was probably the first step.Originally posted by The Right Blue:
Everyone on here if basing this merely off of the article. People are now going around and saying that since the staff knew of these rumors in March 2014, they should have immediately dismissed him. If the article is factual, K was under no obligation to dismiss him. Rumors are just that: rumors, until they aren't. if the accusers are unwilling to take any action, what are you supposed to do?Originally posted by GTHC, GTH!:
The most important thing for us, as fans, is to not start sounding like UNC fans with their school wide academic fraud case. They still don't acknowledge wrong doing and won't listen to the facts as they come out. Look, if Sheed did, he deserves to go to prison. Getting rid of him is the right thing to do. And yes, we need to let evidence and all that to come out, but we have to embrace that this actually a big deal and that we support the truth and for the responsible parties to actual admit responsibility and do things accordingly. They still don't do that in Chapel Hill.
I grew up in PA as a PSU fan and I guess you could draw a very loose parallel -- but, obviously there are some huge differences: (i) even if you believed everything reported was accurate (which is a gigantic, huge assumption that probably shouldn't be made), the suggestion is that the coaches were made aware of a 3nd-hand rumor of sexual assault allegations from a team psychologist -- which is entirely different than an assistant (at least allegedly) reporting to have observed a sexual assault in the football facility; (ii) the program wasn't sitting on any information that other people in the university / community didn't know about; (iii) the fact that children were involved significantly changes things; and (iv) the program ultimately took action to dismiss Sulaimon.Originally posted by Tim1515:
I sure there will be a ton of kickback on me for this...but...
Joe Paterno was told of a horrible incident and reported it to the athletic director and the head of campus security.
The fact that he didn't pursue the allegations further after he reported them was his crime and he was burned at the stake for it. I will never defend Joes actions but he was the only one to make the right choice initially.
I bring this up because our society loves to destroy those on top...no matter what K did or did not do...even if in time he ends up being 100% correct...there will likely be a large outcry from those who want to see good men fail.
People will judge K loudly before we know all the facts...just be prepared...the statement, "don't let the facts cloud a good story" is the American culture these days.
Exactly! We have a "innocent until proven guilty" judicial system. Everyone should wait for the facts before making any judgements one way or another.Originally posted by skysdad:
Just like te Chris Jones situation I'll wait until everything is in before I determine anything. OFC
Chov, misery loves company. They have their own crosses to bear. Of course a lot of them over there will wish bad upon Duke. We are just going to have to ignore it. What I would like to see is justice to be served justly and as swiftly as possible for everyone involved.Originally posted by chov1125:
Wow. Good ole' Steat at THR says best case scenario is that this story stays relevant for the next couple of months so that its bad press for Duke...With all the dynamics at play here and the issue of sexual assault being as sensitive as it is, to be rooting for longevity so that it results in bad press for Duke is as evil as it gets...It is their board and I respect that so I won't make comments there, but if he is reading this, shame on you.
The obviously huge difference being that (i) there was no formal allegation / report that was mishandled; (ii) FSU never took any action against Winston -- i.e., it's not really similar at all.Originally posted by LastWaltz:
Paterno may have followed the correct chain of command but the sticking point there is he allowed Sandusky to continue to come around and did not banish him from the facilities. Joe much like K held all of the power at that University and chose not to use it. He went with out if site out if mind.
Look no further than Jameis Winston to see how ugly this will be. There are many media members who would love nothing more than to cut down K at the knees.
It's impossible to know how this story will play out, but the huge -- critical difference -- was that FSU decided to stick its neck out on the line to keep Winston in school in the face of a complaining witness who reported the incident to the police, and continually to vocally and publicly accuse Winston of rape.Originally posted by LastWaltz:
Good job pulling out of that what you wanted to. I was referring more to how the media will handle this than anything else. Once this becomes mainstream the reporting and digging will become non stop.
Also I have always found it odd for a group so quick to point out that situations like Duke Lax exist to think that a State's attorney, a state funded university, and a former State Supreme Court Judge all felt it was worth their reputations to cover up for a football player.
ESPN torched FSU and it caused ratings to soar, they'll do the same to anyone for profit. Plus the movie being released this Friday related to female campus issues will only feed the fire.Originally posted by aah555:
It's impossible to know how this story will play out, but the huge -- critical difference -- was that FSU decided to stick its neck out on the line to keep Winston in school in the face of a complaining witness who reported the incident to the police, and continually to vocally and publicly accuse Winston of rape.Originally posted by LastWaltz:
Good job pulling out of that what you wanted to. I was referring more to how the media will handle this than anything else. Once this becomes mainstream the reporting and digging will become non stop.
Also I have always found it odd for a group so quick to point out that situations like Duke Lax exist to think that a State's attorney, a state funded university, and a former State Supreme Court Judge all felt it was worth their reputations to cover up for a football player.
It may be unfair to Sheed if it turns out these public statements were completely untrue, but the Duke program -- unlike FSU -- prophylactically elected to disassociate itself from Sheed. The Winston story wouldn't have played out the way it did if FSU had not insisted on starting him. Obviously, the fact that he was the QB for the national champion -- i.e., the most high-profile player on the most high-profile team also made a difference.
The real comp. would be if a student had filed a complaint accusing Okafor of rape, and the school elected to not investigate the issue and feature him in the NCAA tournament.
I'm not saying there won't be a public PR hit -- but I don't think what I'm reading even remotely compares to the Winston situation. Also, just practically, the PSU and FSU stories were largely sensationalized by ESPN. When you consider how prominent former Duke guys are to their on-air and off-air basketball operation / people who have long ties to Coach K (whether it be Bilas, JayWill, Shane Battier, or even Dick Vitale) and how important Duke games are to driving ratings, I have a feeling that there won't be the same kind of rush to judgment in this situation as there has been in the comps. that are being thrown around.
This post was edited on 3/2 11:45 AM by aah555