ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

Mac9192 said:
Listen to yourself. For years, the left has shouting that it was only Trump supporters that went in, and you guys called us all liars. You guys pounded us because up until recently, the msm still had major control. THE TIDE HAS CHANGED.

Now you're sitting here claiming it was only 4 that made it in, and 13 that breached the barricade.

But even if you are right on your claim (which you aren't), then something very telling just happened.

WHICH IS:

***YOU WERE WRONG FROM THE START***
Click to expand...
I am far, far, far more correct than you are.

We've "pounded" you because you believe ridiculous, false things, like the election's having been stolen and antifa having set up the insurrection. Now you're citing the Inspector General's report as evidence of something it specifically says did not happen.

MSM has a lot of problems. We've discussed them pretty cordially recently. The solution to what's wrong w/ MSM is not to replace them w/ news you like better that is no less biased and far less credible. You're acting like truth and power are the same thing and should be the same thing.
 
KDSTONE said:
Very telling and also pretty much a given at this point. A broken clock is right more often.
Typical liberal backtracking: At first it’s: The FBI didn’t take part in Jan 6. Anyone who thinks that is a conspiracy nut.
A few years later: Well, the FBI may have been there, but they weren’t leading the “insurrection”. A couple years from now: Well, the FBI may have led the insurrection but that’s not as bad as that time that Trump…….
Click to expand...
Did everyone who entered the Capitol get charged? Or were there some people who followed others in, but weren't charged because they (wait for it...) didn't take part in the looting and destruction?

The FBI didn't "take part." There were 26 non-payroll CIs on site, instructed not to participate in criminal behavior. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that nearly every political demonstration in DC of thousands of people has a few undercover whatevers among them. Their mere presence is a nothingburger.

And in the bold, you're again speaking something into existence to get all riled up about. Didn't happen.
 
Dattier said:
I am far, far, far more correct than you are.

We've "pounded" you because you believe ridiculous, false things, like the election's having been stolen and antifa having set up the insurrection. Now you're citing the Inspector General's report as evidence of something it specifically says did not happen.

MSM has a lot of problems. We've discussed them pretty cordially recently. The solution to what's wrong w/ MSM is not to replace them w/ news you like better that is no less biased and far less credible. You're acting like truth and power are the same thing and should be the same thing.
Click to expand...
I said Biden wasn't fit from day 1. FACT
I said Kamala was even worse than Biden. FACT
I said that there were a lot more to Jan 6 than we were told. FACT
I said the msm has been corrupt for a long time. FACT
I said Covid, though real, was a planned virus meant to wreak intentional havoc. FACT

**This one hasn't been proven yet, but it will one day** In Obama's two wins, the most votes he got was 69 million, yet we are supposed to believe that an old man whose mind was already failing, got 81 million. Biden couldn't even fill up a high school gym with supporters.

You still argue every one of these that I mentioned.

I don't claim to be a smart guy. But with our current state of affairs, I run circles around you. Why? Because I quit playing party politics years ago. You haven't.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: dukesince91 and Dattier
Dattier said:
He did not have the legal authority to impose consequences. That's the very definition of vigilantism. What you're saying is that some vigilantism is acceptable and I'll concede that, as well.
Click to expand...
He was not acting from a place of authority in order to punish Neely. He was acting as a good Samaritan in order to protect the woman/people who Neely was threatening to kill. A good Samaritan, not a vigilante. Vigilantes search for situations to insert themselves into. I seriously doubt that Penny was looking for someone to hurt that day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukesince91 and smashmouth5
GhostOf301 said:
He was not acting from a place of authority in order to punish Neely. He was acting as a good Samaritan in order to protect the woman/people who Neely was threatening to kill. A good Samaritan, not a vigilante. Vigilantes search for situations to insert themselves into. I seriously doubt that Penny was looking for someone to hurt that day.
Click to expand...
I'm not interested in arguing about the textbook definition of what a vigilante is.
 
Mac9192 said:
I said Biden wasn't fit from day 1. FACT
I said Kamala was even worse than Biden. FACT
I said that there were a lot more to Jan 6 than we were told. FACT
I said the msm has been corrupt for a long time. FACT
I said Covid, though real, was a planned virus meant to wreak intentional havoc. FACT

**This one hasn't been proven yet, but it will one day** In Obama's two wins, the most votes he got was 69 million, yet we are supposed to believe that an old man whose mind was already failing, got 81 million. Biden couldn't even fill up a high school gym with supporters.

You still argue every one of these that I mentioned.

I don't claim to be a smart guy. But with our current state of affairs, I run circles around you. Why? Because I quit playing party politics years ago. You haven't.
Click to expand...
* President Biden was and is more fit than you've ever accepted, which is not difficult because you buried the bar underground.
* VP Harris was a far better candidate for 2024.
* There's nothing of significance about January 6th that changes it from anything but a 100% embarrassment for Trump supporters. The Inspector General's report confirms this.
* MSM is compromised, not necessarily corrupt, and they're still world's more credible than the junk you cite.
* There is no evidence that Covid was deliberately released.
* Voter turnout was considerably higher in 2020 due to the broader use of absentee and mail-in ballots. And it was during a pandemic that had most of us locked down to some degree, so all kinds of obstacles and distractions that usually exist didn't. There was also a very strong anti-Trump voting block in 2020; it didn't matter who was running against him.

Everything you stated was an opinion. Not facts. Opinions. Of my responses, #1, 2, and 4 are opinions that I own and stand by. #3, 5, and 6 are rooted in facts and logic. Yeah, I'm not conceding a single one of them as written, but you're so unhinged you don't actually know what I, personally, have argued from day 1, so screw your "still argue."

The first bits of evidence that you're not a smart guy are your extremist hyperbole and loose grasp of what words mean. Calling those statements facts is an obvious example. And the only way you aren't playing party politics is that party politics are actually playing you. You regurgitate every distortion and misinformation nugget you gobble down from the rightwing conspiracy theorists you think are doing real journalism.
 
Dattier said:
I'm not interested in arguing about the textbook definition of what a vigilante is.
Click to expand...
Well, this is a cop out. You don't need the textbook definition of what a vigilante is. Because you are falsely applying the word where it doesn't apply. He had legal authority to intervene in a situation in order to protect someone from a current threat. Vigilantes do not have legal authority to take the law into their own hands. This is not a case of vigilantism. Wouldn't expect you to agree, because you are on the left (A.K.A. wrong) side of every issue like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smashmouth5 and KDSTONE
Dattier said:
* President Biden was and is more fit than you've ever accepted, which is not difficult because you buried the bar underground.
* VP Harris was a far better candidate for 2024.
* There's nothing of significance about January 6th that changes it from anything but a 100% embarrassment for Trump supporters. The Inspector General's report confirms this.
* MSM is compromised, not necessarily corrupt, and they're still world's more credible than the junk you cite.
* There is no evidence that Covid was deliberately released.
* Voter turnout was considerably higher in 2020 due to the broader use of absentee and mail-in ballots. And it was during a pandemic that had most of us locked down to some degree, so all kinds of obstacles and distractions that usually exist didn't. There was also a very strong anti-Trump voting block in 2020; it didn't matter who was running against him.

Everything you stated was an opinion. Not facts. Opinions. Of my responses, #1, 2, and 4 are opinions that I own and stand by. #3, 5, and 6 are rooted in facts and logic. Yeah, I'm not conceding a single one of them as written, but you're so unhinged you don't actually know what I, personally, have argued from day 1, so screw your "still argue."

The first bits of evidence that you're not a smart guy are your extremist hyperbole and loose grasp of what words mean. Calling those statements facts is an obvious example. And the only way you aren't playing party politics is that party politics are actually playing you. You regurgitate every distortion and misinformation nugget you gobble down from the rightwing conspiracy theorists you think are doing real journalism.
Click to expand...
“Loose grasp of what words mean”. That’s funny coming from you who, just in the past few hours, has intentionally butchered the meanings of the words insurrection and vigilante to fit your lame arguments
 
Dattier said:
* President Biden was and is more fit than you've ever accepted, which is not difficult because you buried the bar underground.
* VP Harris was a far better candidate for 2024.
* There's nothing of significance about January 6th that changes it from anything but a 100% embarrassment for Trump supporters. The Inspector General's report confirms this.
* MSM is compromised, not necessarily corrupt, and they're still world's more credible than the junk you cite.
* There is no evidence that Covid was deliberately released.
* Voter turnout was considerably higher in 2020 due to the broader use of absentee and mail-in ballots. And it was during a pandemic that had most of us locked down to some degree, so all kinds of obstacles and distractions that usually exist didn't. There was also a very strong anti-Trump voting block in 2020; it didn't matter who was running against him.

Everything you stated was an opinion. Not facts. Opinions. Of my responses, #1, 2, and 4 are opinions that I own and stand by. #3, 5, and 6 are rooted in facts and logic. Yeah, I'm not conceding a single one of them as written, but you're so unhinged you don't actually know what I, personally, have argued from day 1, so screw your "still argue."

The first bits of evidence that you're not a smart guy are your extremist hyperbole and loose grasp of what words mean. Calling those statements facts is an obvious example. And the only way you aren't playing party politics is that party politics are actually playing you. You regurgitate every distortion and misinformation nugget you gobble down from the rightwing conspiracy theorists you think are doing real journalism.
Click to expand...
Anything disturbing to your existing world view is a “conspiracy theory” Hopeless You’ve learned nothing from the past few years of legacy hoaxes and misinformation It’s good for our side that you guys are so slow on the uptake though so… thanks??
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192
Dattier said:
* President Biden was and is more fit than you've ever accepted, which is not difficult because you buried the bar underground.
* VP Harris was a far better candidate for 2024.
* There's nothing of significance about January 6th that changes it from anything but a 100% embarrassment for Trump supporters. The Inspector General's report confirms this.
* MSM is compromised, not necessarily corrupt, and they're still world's more credible than the junk you cite.
* There is no evidence that Covid was deliberately released.
* Voter turnout was considerably higher in 2020 due to the broader use of absentee and mail-in ballots. And it was during a pandemic that had most of us locked down to some degree, so all kinds of obstacles and distractions that usually exist didn't. There was also a very strong anti-Trump voting block in 2020; it didn't matter who was running against him.
Click to expand...
Biden never led this country. His only decisions were picking Fruit Loops or Cheerios. Your post here started out awful, yet somehow managed to get worse. You are one dense fool to say Harris was a better candidate for 2024. There's times (every full moon) where you post something that makes a little sense. This isn't one of them though.

Ever since Jan 6th, 2021, you have been saying it was "only" Trump supporters. Now you're saying "there were only 17 non Trumpers." You're telling us you were wrong but not admitting it.

No evidence that Covid was deliberately released? Did you type that with a straight face?
Your comment on the 2020 voter turnout? Again, if you typed that with a straight face, you need an award.

The only part where you might get any admission from me is Trump 2020 vs Trump 2024. America was too divided in 20. But over these last four years, more Americans finally realized how corrupt/full of shit the system and MSM are, and voted accordingly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: smashmouth5 and KDSTONE
Nothing about gun control when he pardons his son for felony gun charges. Nothing about gun control when Trump gets shot. Nothing about gun control when the CEO is gunned down in broad daylight. But when another deranged leftist brainwashed with liberal ideologies shoots up a Christian school.... NOW we must talk about gun control.
 
GhostOf301 said:
Nothing about gun control when he pardons his son for felony gun charges. Nothing about gun control when Trump gets shot. Nothing about gun control when the CEO is gunned down in broad daylight. But when another deranged leftist brainwashed with liberal ideologies shoots up a Christian school.... NOW we must talk about gun control.
Click to expand...
They’ll be coming out of the woodwork now that Luigi is treated like a rock star on social media. These are vapid, buffoonish Leftists. Makes the hippies of the 60s look like Aristotle and Plato
 
GhostOf301 said:
Nothing about gun control when he pardons his son for felony gun charges. Nothing about gun control when Trump gets shot. Nothing about gun control when the CEO is gunned down in broad daylight. But when another deranged leftist brainwashed with liberal ideologies shoots up a Christian school.... NOW we must talk about gun control.
Click to expand...
Children are innocent. The others “had it coming” That’s the quiet part they say out loud more and more often
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192
At least Datt still comes around. I guess the Ol Gal (I won’t call her by name) must be holed up in her place. Shaved head and all.
 
Mac9192 said:
At least Datt still comes around. I guess the Ol Gal (I won’t call her by name) must be holed up in her place. Shaved head and all.
Click to expand...
I miss her posts. Seldom have I laughed so hard in my adult life. She’s quiet quit politics I’m afraid
 
GhostOf301 said:
Nothing about gun control when he pardons his son for felony gun charges. Nothing about gun control when Trump gets shot. Nothing about gun control when the CEO is gunned down in broad daylight. But when another deranged leftist brainwashed with liberal ideologies shoots up a Christian school.... NOW we must talk about gun control.
Click to expand...
The shooter was a student at the school.

Nice try, though.
 
Dattier said:
The shooter was a student at the school.

Nice try, though.
Click to expand...
What does that have to do with anything? Do you think her feminist views were Christian based, or Leftist propaganda?

Also, what do you have to say about the selective gun control pandering?
 
Back to the justification of killing the CEO. So they are responsible for deaths by refusing coverage for life saving procedures, therefore they are not innocent. Do we have the same understanding for people who justify bombing abortion clinics because they are responsible for the death of thousands of children each year?
 
GhostOf301 said:
What does that have to do with anything?
Click to expand...
This was a student receiving a private religious education, not a deranged leftist. She was 15, for crying out loud.

GhostOf301 said:
Do you think her feminist views were Christian propaganda, or Leftist propaganda?

Also, what do you have to say about the selective gun control pandering?
Click to expand...
FIFY, and neither of us knows, so talk to your doctor about how to last longer.

I think none of it exists, and gtMLo of here w/ your loaded, partisan quackery. For starters, it's not pandering; it's advocating for what the majority of Americans want. And comparing individual, targeted, political shootings to mass shootings is a false equivalency. Oh, and waaaah, your MSM is just covering it that way, waaaah. :rolleyes: It's a BC nonstarter.


GhostOf301 said:
Back to the justification of killing the CEO. So they are responsible for deaths by refusing coverage for life saving procedures, therefore they are not innocent. Do we have the same understanding for people who justify bombing abortion clinics because they are responsible for the death of thousands of children each year?
Click to expand...
Oh, that's the justification alright. Another false equivalency, though. Science and sane medical professionals distinguish between fetuses and children. I'm aware that you can't.

Do you condone the bombing of abortion clinics? Think of the property damage! 🤣
 
Last edited:
Dattier said:
This was a student receiving a private religious education, not a deranged leftist. She was 15, for crying out loud.


FIFY, and neither of us knows, so talk to your doctor about how to last longer.

I think none of it exists, and gtMLo of here w/ your loaded, partisan quackery. For starters, it's not pandering; it's advocating for what the majority of Americans want. And comparing individual, targeted, political shootings to mass shootings is a false equivalency. Oh, and waaaah, your MSM is just covering it that way, waaaah. :rolleyes: It's a BC nonstarter.



Oh, that's the justification alright. Another false equivalency, though. Science and sane medical professionals distinguish between fetuses and children. I'm aware that you can't.

Do you condone the bombing of abortion clinics? Think of the property damage! 🤣
Click to expand...
Her feminist views were definitely from leftists propaganda, her parents sending her to a Christian school does not mean that she can't be a deranged leftist, which she clearly was.

No one was comparing individual shootings to mass shootings. So according to you, gun control doesn't matter as long as there are only single shootings. So let's talk about the "mass shootings" that occur on a weekly basis that don't get talked about in the gun control conversation. Gang related shootings. Gun control only gets brought up when there is a narrative to be had. It's dishonest and politically motivated.

No, I do not condone abortion clinic bombings. That is what makes me a better person than you. And you pretending to be a Christian while lying about when human life begins is something that you will have to answer to one day.
 
GhostOf301 said:
Her feminist views were definitely from leftists propaganda, her parents sending her to a Christian school does not mean that she can't be a deranged leftist, which she clearly was.
Click to expand...
🤣
I saw misanthropy in what I've seen of her alleged manifesto. Nothing leftist about that. Nothing feminist about that. Perhaps it was a predictable backlash against her parents' freakish right-wing "Christian" extremist indoctrination. But go ahead and pull your hammies trying to justify your BC take.


GhostOf301 said:
No one was comparing individual shootings to mass shootings.
Click to expand...
You did when you tried to claim there is gun control pandering based on different reactions to different types of shootings.


GhostOf301 said:
So according to you
Click to expand...
You don't know what I think about this and you don't care. You just want to paint some caricature of me that's one-dimensional enough to give you a fighting chance.


GhostOf301 said:
So let's talk about
Click to expand...
Nope. You're a bad faith actor (see above). I'm done engaging with you on this until you can demonstrate this is anything other than a BC pissing match.

GhostOf301 said:
No, I do not condone abortion clinic bombings. That is what makes me a better person than you. And you pretending to be a Christian while lying about when human life begins is something that you will have to answer to one day.
Click to expand...
Wait. I haven't condoned abortion clinic bombings or assassinating CEOs. I've done exactly what you and AOC have done: condemn murder but express empathy for the people who would feel the urge. So you, me, and AOC are not only equally good people, we also think alike.
Last I checked, I'm the only one of the two of us who claims to be Christian, so your attempt here to judge me is pathetic.

Why did the Southern Baptist Convention of 1971 support abortion? Here, I'll point you in the right direction on that. (News to me: the GOP quietly dropped abortion opposition from their platform other than so-called late term abortions -- arguably the most humane and compassionate types of abortions.) Do you also need me to connect the dots for you about how this addresses your last bit of BC?
 
Dattier said:
🤣
I saw misanthropy in what I've seen of her alleged manifesto. Nothing leftist about that. Nothing feminist about that. Perhaps it was a predictable backlash against her parents' freakish right-wing "Christian" extremist indoctrination. But go ahead and pull your hammies trying to justify your BC take.



You did when you tried to claim there is gun control pandering based on different reactions to different types of shootings.



You don't know what I think about this and you don't care. You just want to paint some caricature of me that's one-dimensional enough to give you a fighting chance.



Nope. You're a bad faith actor (see above). I'm done engaging with you on this until you can demonstrate this is anything other than a BC pissing match.


Wait. I haven't condoned abortion clinic bombings or assassinating CEOs. I've done exactly what you and AOC have done: condemn murder but express empathy for the people who would feel the urge. So you, me, and AOC are not only equally good people, we also think alike.
Last I checked, I'm the only one of the two of us who claims to be Christian, so your attempt here to judge me is pathetic.

Why did the Southern Baptist Convention of 1971 support abortion? Here, I'll point you in the right direction on that. (News to me: the GOP quietly dropped abortion opposition from their platform other than so-called late term abortions -- arguably the most humane and compassionate types of abortions.) Do you also need me to connect the dots for you about how this addresses your last bit of BC?
Click to expand...
Her parents’ extremist “freakish” indoctrination
What are you basing this comment on or are you projecting your own prejudices again?
 
KDSTONE said:
Her parents’ extremist “freakish” indoctrination
What are you basing this comment on or are you projecting your own prejudices again?
Click to expand...
Just borrowing a page from your book, casting kneejerk dispersions based on a political agenda. And I said “perhaps.”
 
Are we really pretending like the bogus calls for gun control aren't only made after s mass shooting happens that fits a narrative? The vast majority of mass shootings happen in urban areas and are a weekly occurrence. Outside of community leaders on a local level, there is nothing ever said about them. Certainly not from Washington.

What it is, is politicians are failing to protect soft targets and instead of holding themselves accountable for their gross negligence, they blame the guns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
Dattier said:
According to the extremist rhetoric y’all deal in here, this means that 41% of all 18-29 year olds are sheer evil. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
You mean the same extreme rhetoric the rest of the country deals in? You’re unglued. It’s admirable you’ve hung around, but you ought to think about a nap or something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
Mac9192 said:
You mean the same extreme rhetoric the rest of the country deals in? You’re unglued. It’s admirable you’ve hung around, but you ought to think about a nap or something.
Click to expand...
Bu-bu-but what about them?!

The hit dog yelps. 😂
 
Dattier said:
Awww, thanks! That’s one of my favorite movies.
View embedded media


Do you actually know how fights work?
Click to expand...
So this is your comeback? Your side had power for the last four years. It was awful. The media are licking their wounds, with many (Stephen A Smith may be loudest) admitting that democrats have lost their way.

WE HAVE BEEN SAYING THESE EXACT THINGS FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS.

Now go ahead and come back with some ridiculous remark, which will only show your delusion, or your good attempts at trolling. But the thing to do would be to follow the lead of Stephen A Smith, and eat your crow like a big boy.
 
Last edited:
Dattier said:
A month ago y’all were bragging about pulling a higher percentage of the youth than you had in decades. Now you’re deporting them back to the left, huh? 😂
Click to expand...
Is this something that actually happened? I don't remember doing that. Also, it would be the anti-capitalists, pro social healthcare people who would be okay with the CEO being murdered. So it's safe to assume that those would be leftist yutes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back