Obviously you seem to have a personal stake in this. Does the 'Martin' part of your handle have any relationship to Gov. Martin? And whether it does or not, just why are we to believe that he didn't 'whitewash'...or that he was 'only used'? Because you say so, with absolutely no proof to back that up.
You mentioned in an earlier post of his accomplishments (even though you're reaching a little with tuba playing), and that we should keep that in mind. But just as we can keep accomplishments in mind...that doesn't totally excuse failures.
Jim Martin was the governor of NC. He endorsed, and passed numerous bills while in office. So he's not a stranger with researching information. He's an intelligent man, and knows how to get things done. So, what happened? He had access to all the info. Did he not take the time to dig deep enough...and if so...why not? Did he just take the word of the UNC administration...and if he did...again, why? Or did he just rubberstamp it, and if he did...again, why? I think the most logical conclusion is staring us in the face.
Governor Martin signed his name to many laws he passed in the state of NC, and he put his name on his report about UNC too. He's also had almost 3 years to clarify any errors or that he 'misspoke' before now...but he didn't make much of an effort to do that. He's now doing what UNC has been doing for 5 years...damage control...PR spin...whatever you want to call it. Believe what you want to believe, but the information we have speaks far more about what probably happened than someone's blind belief.
I made some jpegs of the 1st page of Governor Martin's report (below this paragraph). It seems pretty clear to everyone that he had access...totally unrestriced, help from Baker Tilley (if wanted or needed), etc. Govenor Martin made it concrete what he thought, and made mention of the mechanism for how he came to that conclusion. He signed the 'bill'...it's got his name on it, and he owns it. No amount of spin will change that.
OFC