ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

Nothing about gun control when he pardons his son for felony gun charges. Nothing about gun control when Trump gets shot. Nothing about gun control when the CEO is gunned down in broad daylight. But when another deranged leftist brainwashed with liberal ideologies shoots up a Christian school.... NOW we must talk about gun control.
The shooter was a student at the school.

Nice try, though.

The New Lounge

Nothing about gun control when he pardons his son for felony gun charges. Nothing about gun control when Trump gets shot. Nothing about gun control when the CEO is gunned down in broad daylight. But when another deranged leftist brainwashed with liberal ideologies shoots up a Christian school.... NOW we must talk about gun control.
Children are innocent. The others “had it coming” That’s the quiet part they say out loud more and more often
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192

The New Lounge

Nothing about gun control when he pardons his son for felony gun charges. Nothing about gun control when Trump gets shot. Nothing about gun control when the CEO is gunned down in broad daylight. But when another deranged leftist brainwashed with liberal ideologies shoots up a Christian school.... NOW we must talk about gun control.
They’ll be coming out of the woodwork now that Luigi is treated like a rock star on social media. These are vapid, buffoonish Leftists. Makes the hippies of the 60s look like Aristotle and Plato

The New Lounge

* President Biden was and is more fit than you've ever accepted, which is not difficult because you buried the bar underground.
* VP Harris was a far better candidate for 2024.
* There's nothing of significance about January 6th that changes it from anything but a 100% embarrassment for Trump supporters. The Inspector General's report confirms this.
* MSM is compromised, not necessarily corrupt, and they're still world's more credible than the junk you cite.
* There is no evidence that Covid was deliberately released.
* Voter turnout was considerably higher in 2020 due to the broader use of absentee and mail-in ballots. And it was during a pandemic that had most of us locked down to some degree, so all kinds of obstacles and distractions that usually exist didn't. There was also a very strong anti-Trump voting block in 2020; it didn't matter who was running against him.
Biden never led this country. His only decisions were picking Fruit Loops or Cheerios. Your post here started out awful, yet somehow managed to get worse. You are one dense fool to say Harris was a better candidate for 2024. There's times (every full moon) where you post something that makes a little sense. This isn't one of them though.

Ever since Jan 6th, 2021, you have been saying it was "only" Trump supporters. Now you're saying "there were only 17 non Trumpers." You're telling us you were wrong but not admitting it.

No evidence that Covid was deliberately released? Did you type that with a straight face?
Your comment on the 2020 voter turnout? Again, if you typed that with a straight face, you need an award.

The only part where you might get any admission from me is Trump 2020 vs Trump 2024. America was too divided in 20. But over these last four years, more Americans finally realized how corrupt/full of shit the system and MSM are, and voted accordingly.

The New Lounge

* President Biden was and is more fit than you've ever accepted, which is not difficult because you buried the bar underground.
* VP Harris was a far better candidate for 2024.
* There's nothing of significance about January 6th that changes it from anything but a 100% embarrassment for Trump supporters. The Inspector General's report confirms this.
* MSM is compromised, not necessarily corrupt, and they're still world's more credible than the junk you cite.
* There is no evidence that Covid was deliberately released.
* Voter turnout was considerably higher in 2020 due to the broader use of absentee and mail-in ballots. And it was during a pandemic that had most of us locked down to some degree, so all kinds of obstacles and distractions that usually exist didn't. There was also a very strong anti-Trump voting block in 2020; it didn't matter who was running against him.

Everything you stated was an opinion. Not facts. Opinions. Of my responses, #1, 2, and 4 are opinions that I own and stand by. #3, 5, and 6 are rooted in facts and logic. Yeah, I'm not conceding a single one of them as written, but you're so unhinged you don't actually know what I, personally, have argued from day 1, so screw your "still argue."

The first bits of evidence that you're not a smart guy are your extremist hyperbole and loose grasp of what words mean. Calling those statements facts is an obvious example. And the only way you aren't playing party politics is that party politics are actually playing you. You regurgitate every distortion and misinformation nugget you gobble down from the rightwing conspiracy theorists you think are doing real journalism.
Anything disturbing to your existing world view is a “conspiracy theory” Hopeless You’ve learned nothing from the past few years of legacy hoaxes and misinformation It’s good for our side that you guys are so slow on the uptake though so… thanks??
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192

The New Lounge

* President Biden was and is more fit than you've ever accepted, which is not difficult because you buried the bar underground.
* VP Harris was a far better candidate for 2024.
* There's nothing of significance about January 6th that changes it from anything but a 100% embarrassment for Trump supporters. The Inspector General's report confirms this.
* MSM is compromised, not necessarily corrupt, and they're still world's more credible than the junk you cite.
* There is no evidence that Covid was deliberately released.
* Voter turnout was considerably higher in 2020 due to the broader use of absentee and mail-in ballots. And it was during a pandemic that had most of us locked down to some degree, so all kinds of obstacles and distractions that usually exist didn't. There was also a very strong anti-Trump voting block in 2020; it didn't matter who was running against him.

Everything you stated was an opinion. Not facts. Opinions. Of my responses, #1, 2, and 4 are opinions that I own and stand by. #3, 5, and 6 are rooted in facts and logic. Yeah, I'm not conceding a single one of them as written, but you're so unhinged you don't actually know what I, personally, have argued from day 1, so screw your "still argue."

The first bits of evidence that you're not a smart guy are your extremist hyperbole and loose grasp of what words mean. Calling those statements facts is an obvious example. And the only way you aren't playing party politics is that party politics are actually playing you. You regurgitate every distortion and misinformation nugget you gobble down from the rightwing conspiracy theorists you think are doing real journalism.
“Loose grasp of what words mean”. That’s funny coming from you who, just in the past few hours, has intentionally butchered the meanings of the words insurrection and vigilante to fit your lame arguments

The New Lounge

I'm not interested in arguing about the textbook definition of what a vigilante is.
Well, this is a cop out. You don't need the textbook definition of what a vigilante is. Because you are falsely applying the word where it doesn't apply. He had legal authority to intervene in a situation in order to protect someone from a current threat. Vigilantes do not have legal authority to take the law into their own hands. This is not a case of vigilantism. Wouldn't expect you to agree, because you are on the left (A.K.A. wrong) side of every issue like this.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT