Dattier said:

I condone free speech. I don't partake of music or dancing I don't care for, but I don't whine about it or make assumptions about the character of people who like it, either.

Click to expand...

The_Only_Blue said:

Today at 2. Do we have a chance?

Edit- and Henderson's announcement is at 230

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

KDSTONE said:

So you condone filthy, misogynistic lyrics especially when they’re authored by one of your favored groups. Shocking!

Click to expand...

Dattier said:

Tell us you want those darn kids off your lawn without telling us you want those darn kids off your lawn.

Click to expand...

Dattier said:

Tell us you want those darn kids off your lawn without telling us you want those darn kids off your lawn.

Click to expand...

KDSTONE said:

Rappers have always gotten a free pass from the Left. Tipper Gore was prob the last Democrat to recognize filth when she saw it I’ve been at college football games this year with fans of all ages and races and the lyrics will include talk of white n—, c—, etc. And you look around and even the under 30 crowd is trying to tune it out
Cardi B is a music industry prop. Nothing there there but gutter stuff. She had a funny appearance on Zach G’s Between Two Ferns with Seinfeld. It was funny because of the other two. She was basically just kind of there, but to her credit she didn’t get in the way of the talented people

Click to expand...

GhostOf301 said:

Also, Trump got slack for the grab them by their .... comment that was on a hot mic. Which he should have. But where is the slack for Kamala for having performers twerk on stage at a political rally, and then tonight having a performer rapping about how big her twat is and what she wants to put in it? Not slack from conservatives, but slack from the same people who were "shook to their core" and the same people who were distraught over the disrespect of women?

Frauds. Every last one of them.

Click to expand...

GhostOf301 said:

Also, Trump got slack for the grab them by their .... comment that was on a hot mic. Which he should have. But where is the slack for Kamala for having performers twerk on stage at a political rally, and then tonight having a performer rapping about how big her twat is and what she wants to put in it? Not slack from conservatives, but slack from the same people who were "shook to their core" and the same people who were distraught over the disrespect of women?

Frauds. Every last one of them.

Click to expand...

GhostOf301 said:

Moving on. Let me find the next progressive hill for you to die on.

Click to expand...

Dattier said:

Let's assume every rhetorical answer you want.
Now, why would a middle school librarian include a title like this in their collection? What reason would they give? I'm not justifying it. I asked you how someone might try to justify it.

Click to expand...

GhostOf301 said:

Do you consider explicit content on sucking dick to be pornographic material?

Not answering

I don't think activism is automatically a negative thing. But I think you were attempting to cast it as an insult in this case. What makes him an activist? Why refer to him as an activist instead of just an 11 year old who was subjected to content that has no business in his school library?


You keep trying to justify dick sucking content for middle schoolers. Whatever man.

Click to expand...

Dattier said:

There are already clear laws regulating porn with the goal of keeping it out of the hands of minors. That's not the discussion and I have no issue with those laws.

How about just one book? Oedipus Rex. The protagonist murders his father, marries his mother, and has 4 kids with her. Kids are a by-product of sex. And he was doing it with his own mom. The entire play is about discovering this. Should we ban it?

Just because you consider "activist" a negative thing doesn't mean I do. In fact, it's a pretty safe bet that a politically charged word you have a negative opinion of is one I have a positive opinion of. And I think it's a terrible idea for that 11-year-old to read that book, based on what I know of him and his father from a single YouTube video. I never supported that at all.

Click to expand...

Dattier said:

So back to the book in question... have any of you paused to wonder why a school librarian would choose to include a book like that in their collection? Because if all you can come up with is grooming or sheer evil, you're just stupid snowflakes. Anyone want to try to represent what an actual librarian might say? You don't have to endorse it. I just want to know if any of y'all are even willing to hear it.

Click to expand...