ABC did a fact-check afterward:
* VP Harris received 3 "True" ratings and 3 "False" ratings
* President Trump received 0 "True" ratings and 6 "False ratings
* Harris also received 4 ratings of "Needs context" and 3 others rated some degree of truth
* Trump also received 1 "True, but needs context," 1 "Needs context," 1 "Misleading," and 3 others rated some degree of false
So the total is 10 truths/truth-ish & 3 false for Harris; 3 truth-ish & 9 false/false-ish for Trump. And that's giving Trump credit for a "Misleading" statement. So President Trump lied much more than VP Harris. It makes sense that if anyone was fact-checked more by the mods, it would be him.
Politifact:
Harris- false, true, 2 mostly false, half true (total: 1-4 at
worst)
Trump- 6 false, 3 "Pants on Fire!" (so even worse than "false"), 2 mostly false, 2 half true, and a mostly true (total: 3-11 at
best)
Reuters: Their analyses are more narrative, with no consistent, succinct ratings.
FactCheck.org: Like Reuters, it's narrative and hard to tally.
According to
Newsweek, the mods fact-checked President Trump 4 times: (1) "There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it's born," (2) "...no credible reports of specific claims of pets being harmed, injured or abused by individuals within the immigrant community," (3) "...overall violent crime is actually coming down in this country," and (4) "..60 cases in front of many judges, many of them Republican, looked at it and said there was no widespread fraud." Those are some doozies, and pretty easy to predict and therefore prepare for. He also lied way, way more than Harris. What were they supposed to fact-check with Harris? that "nearly $4,000" was the high end projection from a liberal group? or debate what constitutes a "combat zone" where troops are deployed?