ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

You're more educated than me, more cunning, and more clever at knowing how to avoid an issue, or getting things off the issue. Like right now.

But you've also been indoctrinated. Which makes your overall intelligence extremely low.
Being educated doesn't make one more intelligent, but if you have to play the odds...

I don't base my thoughts on msm; I'm not a member of the Democratic Party; I didn't vote for Biden in the 2020 primary; I've used and taught critical thinking skills for 29.375 years. I don't consider myself above indoctrination, which is a good way of staying alert to make sure it doesn't happen. I am confident I am far less brainwashed than you.

You've revealed some really unflattering things about yourself today, mac:
* I wasn't nice to you 7 years ago and you've been holding a grudge ever since.
* You're practically begging me to tell you you were right and I was wrong when at best you guessed something. At no point have you offered any proof except the eye test, and if you ever saw Marty Pocius' calves, you would know isn't all that.

I owe you nothing, and you've engendered exactly zero charity.
 
The question you should be asking is how (and why) was he the President? He didn't get like this later into his term, he was bad before he was sworn in. Instead you spin it a little.

Own it. This was one of the biggest scam jobs in the history of our country.
In TeH hIsToRy oF OuR cOuNtRy!!1! 🤣 🤣 🤣
 
I rest my case.
Without ever evening opening it.

Saying someone else just proved your point or that you rest your case or that you couldn’t have said it better yourself or any other such variation is a lazy way to claim victory without doing anything.

Explain how mocking your hyperbole about how the latest topic is yet another example of the worst thing ever proves anything under discussion in your favor.
 
I say no offense, because I am not saying this with the sole intention of offending you @Dattier . But you are one of the most well spoken, passionate and straightforward person I have run across on an anonymous platform. But at the same time, one of the most condescending, immature and spiteful person in general. You're a tough one to figure out. Now you have already made it clear that you would rather spit in my eye than shake my hand. But I still wonder if you would be a fun person to have a beer with or not.
 
I say no offense, because I am not saying this with the sole intention of offending you @Dattier . But you are one of the most well spoken, passionate and straightforward person I have run across on an anonymous platform. But at the same time, one of the most condescending, immature and spiteful person in general. You're a tough one to figure out. Now you have already made it clear that you would rather spit in my eye than shake my hand. But I still wonder if you would be a fun person to have a beer with or not.
No offense taken.
I am reactionary.
I would not spit in your eye nor prefer to, but I would have fun not shaking your hand. It would almost be worth having 2 whole beers with you just to extend the non-handshaking.
I like poking the bear.
 
Performative. First Ukraine, then Canada, now South Africa. Who will be the next contestant on Photo Op Ambush?

Where are the stats on hate crimes against white S. African farmers? And any analysis of the tensions there? As far as I know, Elon Musk whispered in our President's ear and now he's pursuing a line of ketchup through the ocean like the world's dumbest shark.

Plus, everyone knows how easy it is to pay a bunch of poor, scary, scary Black people to chant things on video when you have the dark money backing of conservative supervillain Seorge Goros.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: KDSTONE
Performative? Maybe.
Even so, it’s an improvement over the last admin who acted like this racist clown was the second coming of Nelson Mandela. He openly supports Putin and Hamas. He needs to be dressed down.

Stats? The South African govt is in charge of stats last I checked so that’s a no go. There’s enough violence and intimidation where Afrikaaners who have lived there for centuries are starting to leave so that speaks volumes. Have there been thousands of white farmers killed? Probably not. Hundreds? Maybe. Why would you stick around and find out when the govt not only turns a blind eye but actively encourages genocide?
 
Performative? Maybe.
Even so, it’s an improvement over the last admin who acted like this racist clown was the second coming of Nelson Mandela. He openly supports Putin and Hamas. He needs to be dressed down.

Stats? The South African govt is in charge of stats last I checked so that’s a no go. There’s enough violence and intimidation where Afrikaaners who have lived there for centuries are starting to leave so that speaks volumes. Have there been thousands of white farmers killed? Probably not. Hundreds? Maybe. Why would you stick around and find out when the govt not only turns a blind eye but actively encourages genocide?
I'm skeptical of anything conservatives call racism, considering how many allegations of racism they deny when the alleged victims are the traditionally marginalized groups who have always faced racism.

President Ramaphosa has visited Moscow and called for peace in Ukraine, which Putin rejected. He visited Ukraine and called for peace, as well.
While it's certainly more complicated, how can you not have the slightest understanding and empathy for why native South Africans would identify more closely with Palestinians? Calling for a cease fire and expressing concern about Israel's unilateral blockades are entirely reasonable.
In what way does the South African govt "actively encourag[e] genocide"? If you mean that they have a policy that inadvertently encourages genocide, just say so and proceed to connect those dots for me, pretty, pretty please.
 
Last edited:
I'm skeptical of anything conservatives call racism, considering how many allegations of racism they deny when the alleged victims are the traditionally marginalized groups who have always faced racism.
Another one of your humdingers. You are like the gift that keeps on giving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
I'm skeptical of anything conservatives call racism, considering how many allegations of racism they deny when the alleged victims are the traditionally marginalized groups who have always faced racism.

President Ramaphosa has visited Moscow and called for peace in Ukraine, which Putin rejected. He visited Ukraine and called for peace, as well.
While it's certainly more complicated, how can you not have the slightest understanding and empathy for why native South Africans would identify more closely with Palestinians? Calling for a cease fire and expressing concern about Israel's unilateral blockades are entirely reasonable.
In what way does the South African govt "actively encourag[e] gendocide"? If you mean that they have a policy that inadvertently encourages genocide, just say so and proceed to connect those dots for me, pretty, pretty please.
I do have more than the slightest understanding of why South Africa would “ identify” with the “Palestinians”. Both groups have gotten the short end of the stick, one through no fault of their own, one due to radical Islam and blind Jew hatred which prevented them from taking a deal giving them about 85 % of historical Palestine after WW2. Jordan got about 67% so there’s already one Pali state to go along with tens of other Muslim nations.
Identification is a far cry from hosting delegations of Hamas officials on multiple occasions and being the ring leader of false genocide claims against Israel in the ICC. You have always insisted that there is daylight between Hamas and the “civilian” population. Now you refer to identification with the Palis and Hamas as if it’s the same thing.
Was calling for a ceasefire immediately after Oct 7 before Israel had even responded? Was that entirely reasonable as well?
 
I'm skeptical of anything conservatives call racism, considering how many allegations of racism they deny when the alleged victims are the traditionally marginalized groups who have always faced racism.

President Ramaphosa has visited Moscow and called for peace in Ukraine, which Putin rejected. He visited Ukraine and called for peace, as well.
While it's certainly more complicated, how can you not have the slightest understanding and empathy for why native South Africans would identify more closely with Palestinians? Calling for a cease fire and expressing concern about Israel's unilateral blockades are entirely reasonable.
In what way does the South African govt "actively encourag[e] gendocide"? If you mean that they have a policy that inadvertently encourages genocide, just say so and proceed to connect those dots for me, pretty, pretty please.
So he “called for peace” in Ukraine did he? What a visionary. This is in stark contrast to the scores of international leaders who are on record stating they want the war to continue. What are his conditions for peace? Would Putin be allowed to keep territory gained in the war? If so, this would be decidedly pro Putin. Or are there no conditions as if each side will one day just wake up and stop fighting? If it’s the latter then it’s just empty platitudes designed to increase his stature on the world stage. Unfortunately, South Africa has no leverage on the global sphere as they will likely soon be indistinguishable from other African nations in GDP and quality of life levels. China’s bought up their natural resources and crime rates are through the roof
 
I do have more than the slightest understanding of why South Africa would “ identify” with the “Palestinians”. Both groups have gotten the short end of the stick, one through no fault of their own, one due to radical Islam and blind Jew hatred which prevented them from taking a deal giving them about 85 % of historical Palestine after WW2. Jordan got about 67% so there’s already one Pali state to go along with tens of other Muslim nations.
Identification is a far cry from hosting delegations of Hamas officials on multiple occasions and being the ring leader of false genocide claims against Israel in the ICC. You have always insisted that there is daylight between Hamas and the “civilian” population. Now you refer to identification with the Palis and Hamas as if it’s the same thing.
Was calling for a ceasefire immediately after Oct 7 before Israel had even responded? Was that entirely reasonable as well?
So he “called for peace” in Ukraine did he? What a visionary. This is in stark contrast to the scores of international leaders who are on record stating they want the war to continue. What are his conditions for peace? Would Putin be allowed to keep territory gained in the war? If so, this would be decidedly pro Putin. Or are there no conditions as if each side will one day just wake up and stop fighting? If it’s the latter then it’s just empty platitudes designed to increase his stature on the world stage. Unfortunately, South Africa has no leverage on the global sphere as they will likely soon be indistinguishable from other African nations in GDP and quality of life levels. China’s bought up their natural resources and crime rates are through the roof
This is called "kitchen sinking." Look at the wall of text here. Count the question marks. It's a wild goose chase.

You definitely don't demonstrate any empathy for why native S Africans would feel allegiance w/ Palestine from the moment you put "identity" in quotation marks. You're basically saying they're too stupid to see Palestinians like you do. That's the context for your understanding.

Funny how my request for actual data about hate crimes in S Africa was waved away because they're govt stats, but you're so willing to trot out govt stats when it comes to Israel.

While excusing every ridiculous thing President Trump does, y'all cling to the slightest mistake in others to justify why they deserve to be treated like crap as guests.

South Africa's relative irrelevance in global politics makes it that much more clear that our President's concern for white land owners there is a favor for his buddy Musk who has a vested interest in keeping things as close to colonial rule as possible in South Africa.

So about that genocide in South Africa.........?
 
Last edited:
Without ever evening opening it.

Saying someone else just proved your point or that you rest your case or that you couldn’t have said it better yourself or any other such variation is a lazy way to claim victory without doing anything.

Explain how mocking your hyperbole about how the latest topic is yet another example of the worst thing ever proves anything under discussion in your favor.
Did Jake Tapper not just prove what millions (and I'm one of those, which chaps your ass) knew four plus years ago, that Biden wasn't fit for office? Is that not proof?? Of course it is, you'll just find a way to spin it like you always do.

You just can't stand it when I'm right. Let it go Datt, let it go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dukesince91
I asked so many questions only because your post was so vague and devoid of any meaningful information.
Re: the stats, best I can glean in a few minutes search, there have been increased attacks on farmers in recent years. The govt states that it doesnt keep records of farmers’ race ( weird right?) so it doesn’t know if deaths of white farmers have increased specifically or just farmers’ deaths in general. That’s their story and they’re sticking to it. Although some radical groups in Sourh Africa call for genocidal retribution against Afrikaner land owners, I’ve found no evidence of it being govt sanctioned and there’s definitely not enough evidence to support accusations of genocide. If Fox News or Newsmax has any, they would have posted it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dattier
I asked so many questions only because your post was so vague and devoid of any meaningful information.
Re: the stats, best I can glean in a few minutes search, there have been increased attacks on farmers in recent years. The govt states that it doesnt keep records of farmers’ race ( weird right?) so it doesn’t know if deaths of white farmers have increased specifically or just farmers’ deaths in general. That’s their story and they’re sticking to it. Although some radical groups in Sourh Africa call for genocidal retribution against Afrikaner land owners, I’ve found no evidence of it being govt sanctioned and there’s definitely not enough evidence to support accusations of genocide. If Fox News or Newsmax has any, they would have posted it.
I would think anywhere that has a history of institutionalized racism that still affects the present would find it useful to track racial statistics moving forward.
I also think "farmer" is probably the wrong word here. When I hear the word "farmer," I think of family-owned, family-run farms where the head farmer is out in the field daily. I suspect the people being targeted in South Africa -- in whatever numbers -- are more like landed gentry, who profit passively off of land ownership without actually doing any work. Just a hunch.
I did find something saying President Ramaphosa supports a plan of taking back such land from white land owners, which, phrased like that, is admittedly alarming.
 
I asked so many questions only because your post was so vague and devoid of any meaningful information.
Re: the stats, best I can glean in a few minutes search, there have been increased attacks on farmers in recent years. The govt states that it doesnt keep records of farmers’ race ( weird right?) so it doesn’t know if deaths of white farmers have increased specifically or just farmers’ deaths in general. That’s their story and they’re sticking to it. Although some radical groups in Sourh Africa call for genocidal retribution against Afrikaner land owners, I’ve found no evidence of it being govt sanctioned and there’s definitely not enough evidence to support accusations of genocide. If Fox News or Newsmax has any, they would have posted it.
BBC excerpt- The country has one of the highest murder rates in the world. There were 26,232 murders last year, according to South African Police Service (SAPS) figures.

Of these, 44 were killings of people within the farming community and of those, eight were of farmers.
-------------------------------
CNN excerpt -
There is a lot of violent crime in South Africa. There is not a genocide against White farmers there.

Claims of genocide can sometimes be difficult to adjudicate. This claim is easy. The facts show that the genocide President Donald Trump suggests might be happening is not happening – and that crime against White farmers in South Africa represents a tiny fraction of the country’s overall crime.

The most recent South African official data shows that the country had 19,696 murders from April 2024 through December 2024 – and that the victim in just 36 of these murders, about 0.2%, was linked to farms or smaller agricultural holdings.



Further, only seven of the 36 victims were farmers. (South Africa has Black farmers, too; the official data is not broken down by race.) The other 29 victims included farm employees, who tend to be Black.

Data from groups representing South African farmers also shows that farm killings number in the dozens per year, a minuscule percentage of the country’s total.
------------------------------------
PBS excerpt -
White farmers have been murdered in South Africa. But those murders account for less than 1% of more than 27,000 annual murders nationwide. Experts said the deaths do not amount to genocide, and Trump misleads about land confiscation.

“The idea of a ‘white genocide’ taking place in South Africa is completely false,” said

Gareth Newham, who heads a justice and violence prevention program at the Institute for Security Studies in South Africa.

“As an independent Institute tracking violence and violent crime in South Africa, if there was any evidence of either a genocide or targeted violence taking place against any group based on their ethnicity this, we would be amongst the first to raise (the) alarm and provide the evidence to the world.”

There are about 2.7 million white Afrikaners, who are descendants of Dutch and French settlers, in South Africa. About 80% of the people living in South Africa are Black. From 1948 until the early 1990s, South Africa lived under apartheid rule, racial segregation that gave only white people power and forced Black South Africans to live separately from white people.
 
I think we’re all aware of the apartheid system that existed until the 1980s. There were concerts about it, songs written about it, Mandela was a household name.
I’ve already said I wouldn’t classify what Trump described as a genocide.

One bone to pick: PBS used the fact that white farmers’ murders make up less than 1% of all deaths in South Africa and that this somehow disproved genocide. Oh it sounds somewhat academic but genocide is the specific targeting of civilians based on race, religion, etc.
However many people were killed in the same area for other reasons ( in this case the other 99%) is irrelevant to the adjudication of genocide charges
 
I would think anywhere that has a history of institutionalized racism that still affects the present would find it useful to track racial statistics moving forward.
I also think "farmer" is probably the wrong word here. When I hear the word "farmer," I think of family-owned, family-run farms where the head farmer is out in the field daily. I suspect the people being targeted in South Africa -- in whatever numbers -- are more like landed gentry, who profit passively off of land ownership without actually doing any work. Just a hunch.
I did find something saying President Ramaphosa supports a plan of taking back such land from white land owners, which, phrased like that, is admittedly alarming.
Myth 2 addresses paragraph 2.

 
I don't think of you at all. I've let you go, for sure.
Right. Not gonna call you a liar, but you're not telling the truth. You can't stand it that what I was saying years ago is now being confirmed by folks that are on your side of the aisle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
Not gonna call you a liar, but you're not telling the truth.

Bh1Q7NrCYAEMOox

:rolleyes:
Condescending hypocrite is gonna condescending hypocrite.

You can't stand it that what I was saying years ago is now being confirmed by folks that are on your side of the aisle.
I'm sorry to learn President Biden's condition was and is worse than I knew, and that his condition was apparently covered up. It's a terrible, terrible look for the party whose platform my political values more closely align with. I feel no guilt or shame for not having known and for not leaping to conclusions without proof, nor for being poker-faced about it in the face of someone I don't respect who is playing the same game. I don't owe you an apology.

I don't give you any credit for guessing what you wanted to be true. A blind clock finds a broken squirrel every now and then. In fact, that you take so much glee in President Biden's deteriorating health makes you look even worse according to my eye test.
 
Bh1Q7NrCYAEMOox

:rolleyes:
Condescending hypocrite is gonna condescending hypocrite.


I'm sorry to learn President Biden's condition was and is worse than I knew, and that his condition was apparently covered up. It's a terrible, terrible look for the party whose platform my political values more closely align with. I feel no guilt or shame for not having known and for not leaping to conclusions without proof, nor for being poker-faced about it in the face of someone I don't respect who is playing the same game. I don't owe you an apology.

I don't give you any credit for guessing what you wanted to be true. A blind clock finds a broken squirrel every now and then. In fact, that you take so much glee in President Biden's deteriorating health makes you look even worse according to my eye test.
It’s so laughable that a person that thinks he’s smarter than everyone else couldn’t see that Biden was in poor health in 2020. Heck, my mom was 80 at the time and was saying that he had dementia. She knew what the beginnings of dementia looked like, having seen several of her friends develop it. Contrary to what you say, it’s obvious that you slurp what the media spouts with a big ass straw. Those tears of yours being wrong sure taste good!
 
Bh1Q7NrCYAEMOox

:rolleyes:
Condescending hypocrite is gonna condescending hypocrite.


I'm sorry to learn President Biden's condition was and is worse than I knew, and that his condition was apparently covered up. It's a terrible, terrible look for the party whose platform my political values more closely align with. I feel no guilt or shame for not having known and for not leaping to conclusions without proof, nor for being poker-faced about it in the face of someone I don't respect who is playing the same game. I don't owe you an apology.

I don't give you any credit for guessing what you wanted to be true. A blind clock finds a broken squirrel every now and then. In fact, that you take so much glee in President Biden's deteriorating health makes you look even worse according to my eye test.
At least in your first part you finally acknowledged it. Kudos to you even though it took your own party four years to come clean.
The second part? I take no glee in being right about Biden. It was such an awful thing what they did to this country, and to him.

That is far worse than his condition is.
 
It’s so laughable that a person that thinks he’s smarter than everyone else couldn’t see that Biden was in poor health in 2020. Heck, my mom was 80 at the time and was saying that he had dementia. She knew what the beginnings of dementia looked like, having seen several of her friends develop it. Contrary to what you say, it’s obvious that you slurp what the media spouts with a big ass straw. Those tears of yours being wrong sure taste good!
Says the guy who calls me condescending. :rolleyes:

"Poor health"? That's moving the goalposts. Y'all were claiming he was incapable of a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g in 2020. Here we are in 2025 and he still gives coherent interviews and demonstrates quick wit.

I practically begged y'all to move those goalposts then, to stop w/ the extremist hyperbole so we could have an honest conversation. You refused. I felt no obligation under those circumstances to acknowledge anything.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: dukesince91
At least in your first part you finally acknowledged it. Kudos to you even though it took your own party four years to come clean.
The second part? I take no glee in being right about Biden. It was such an awful thing what they did to this country, and to him.

That is far worse than his condition is.
It wasn't much of a leap, as I've been far closer to acknowledging his actual condition than you were all those years. It doesn't take much when you're setting the bar underground and refusing to drop the hyperbole. I never denied he was an 80+ year old man whose best days were behind him. You never would accept anything short of calling him brain dead.

You're rejoicing in his latest medical reports. Your posts here demonstrate it every day as you preen around demanding apologies like VP Vance keeping score in "thank yous."
 
Last edited:
2 Israeli Embassy staff members assassinated in DC
Horrific and disgusting. Rightly being pursued as a hate crime and act of terrorism.
The interview with the Abc reporter ( video) touched on some of it, and the article was a lovely remembrance but woefully incomplete of what happened. If they have had time to learn that much about the victims, it’s odd that it didn’t mention that the suspect is on video shouting Free Palestine right after the murders and that he has been embedded in the movement for years.
 
The interview with the Abc reporter ( video) touched on some of it, and the article was a lovely remembrance but woefully incomplete of what happened. If they have had time to learn that much about the victims, it’s odd that it didn’t mention that the suspect is on video shouting Free Palestine right after the murders and that he has been embedded in the movement for years.
This one does a better job of covering that.
 
I never denied he was an 80+ year old man whose best days were behind him.
You're rejoicing in his latest medical reports. Your posts here demonstrate it every day as you preen around demanding apologies like VP Vance keeping score in "thank yous."
The "I never denied" part? Any comment you made about Biden until now has been just a generic comment associated with an 80 yr old. So you're being disingenuous at best, or lying at worst.

On the part about me rejoicing in his medical report? A flat out lie. Biden may have been crooked over the years, but I have said no such thing about his cancer diagnosis, nor did I like seeing him mumble, stutter, shuffle... It was nothing short of sad to watch him over the last 5 plus years.

The people that paraded him around are pure evil. No other way to put it. I don't care a whole lot for you, but I don't even think you would do something so sinister.
 
The "I never denied" part? Any comment you made about Biden until now has been just a generic comment associated with an 80 yr old. So you're being disingenuous at best, or lying at worst.
You mean I was generic because I didn't know the details? Or did I know them and was lying? You never can make up your mind. And I've told you: when you set the bar underground -- "worst POTUS in the history of our country by far" -- I don't have to work very hard to be more accurate than you are.

On the part about me rejoicing in his medical report? A flat out lie. Biden may have been crooked over the years, but I have said no such thing about his cancer diagnosis, nor did I like seeing him mumble, stutter, shuffle... It was nothing short of sad to watch him over the last 5 plus years.
You couldn't even use his actual name. It was Jotato or whatever other derisive nickname was en vogue that day. You loved it.
 
You mean I was generic because I didn't know the details? Or did I know them and was lying? You never can make up your mind. And I've told you: when you set the bar underground -- "worst POTUS in the history of our country by far" -- I don't have to work very hard to be more accurate than you are.


You couldn't even use his actual name. It was Jotato or whatever other derisive nickname was en vogue that day. You loved it.
Yes, I called him names over the years, and it was comical and sad to watch him. But your post said I was rejoicing in his latest medical reports, which is the cancer diagnosis. That is a flat out lie. I've also been very critical of the group of people that propped him up as The President. Where is your outrage over that?

You're walking a fine line between gaslighting/manipulation, to just flat out being a liar. Honestly, I think you're both.
 
Last edited:
Fair article until the last paragraph when it went off the rails. So close
No, that's also very fair.

Here's the paragraph before that:
"The shooting is likely to fuel polarization in the United States over the war in Gaza between supporters of Israel and pro-Palestinian demonstrators."
I find it within the reasonable scope of good journalism to make predictions about what might happen as a result. While I'm sure there will be many among the Left rushing to denounce the murders, there will be plenty of volume (if not people) making Luigi comparisons and trying to refocus on Israels's sins. On the Right, this is obviously an escalation of things they already think are out of line.

Then that last paragraph, numbers added for clarity:
"[1] Conservative supporters of Israel led by Trump have branded pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic. [2] His administration has detained protesters without charge and [3] cut off funding to elite U.S. universities that have permitted demonstrations."
I mean, all 3 of those things are true, and explain how the shooting may fuel polarization. I think you and I have argued about those exact 3 things, and not whether they were true or not, but whether they were appropriate or not.

I accept that a lot of msm has a left-leaning bias, and that sometimes that's insurmountable and compromises their credibility. The issue I have with criticism of msm, though, is when conservatives view neutrality as biased against them, like anything not slanted in their favor is troubling for them. Reuters isn't weighing in either way on the merits of those 3 things. They're just stating them.
 
Yes, I called him names over the years, and it was comical and sad to watch him. But your post said I was rejoicing in his latest medical reports, which is the cancer diagnosis. That is a flat out lie. I've also been very critical of the group of people that propped him up as The President. Where is your outrage over that?

You're walking a fine line between gaslighting/manipulation, to just flat out being a liar.
You're practically begging for apologies, credit, submission. You are gleeful about your perception that you are right and that it actually means anything when you just guessed what you wanted to be true. Not a second's worth of sympathy or somberness.

Now you're adding that it was comical to watch him. Comical to watch a man you claim to have known was this bad off. You laughed. You had fun. It was comical. You loved it.

Why would I share my outrage with any of y'all? We're not friends. We're not on the same side.
 
You're practically begging for apologies, credit, submission. You are gleeful about your perception that you are right and that it actually means anything when you just guessed what you wanted to be true. Not a second's worth of sympathy or somberness.

Now you're adding that it was comical to watch him. Comical to watch a man you claim to have known was this bad off. You laughed. You had fun. It was comical. You loved it.

We're not friends. We're not on the same side.
Here you go again. I will admit I'm gleeful about Biden. Not that he has cancer, but that we were right about his mental decline, despite the fact you and the media did nothing but call us liars over the years. I rejoice being able to say "WE TOLD YOU SO."

I shouldn't feel this way, but to be honest, I think you're a prick.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT