ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

Amazing. So because scientists change what they think based on newly available information, they surely must be incorrect about everything and we should just trust what you say based on the fact that you have the ability to cherry pick completely unrelated information and throw it together in a pitiful attempt at creating a coherent argument? Think I'll pass thanks, and I'll just create my opinion based on 60 years of research from the experts in this field rather than some random person who can't even back up their argument with any relevant facts on a basketball message board.

And I shouldn't need to explain why its harder to get a truly accurate reading on the true age of the entire universe than it is to measure gases and heat on our own planet.

Its hilarious how y'all Republicans scream about protecting children all the time but when push comes to shove on the biggest issue facing all our kids you just fall in line with whatever you favorite anti-intellectual right wing mouth piece has to say on the subject.

Thank you...without realizing it, you made my point for me....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fourteen44
Amazing. So because scientists change what they think based on newly available information, they surely must be incorrect about everything and we should just trust what you say based on the fact that you have the ability to cherry pick completely unrelated information and throw it together in a pitiful attempt at creating a coherent argument? Think I'll pass thanks, and I'll just create my opinion based on 60 years of research from the experts in this field rather than some random person who can't even back up their argument with any relevant facts on a basketball message board.

And I shouldn't need to explain why its harder to get a truly accurate reading on the true age of the entire universe than it is to measure gases and heat on our own planet.

Its hilarious how y'all Republicans scream about protecting children all the time but when push comes to shove on the biggest issue facing all our kids you just fall in line with whatever you favorite anti-intellectual right wing mouth piece has to say on the subject.
Not a Republican here, just someone who follows science and logic. Man-driven CC is a farce, but they’ll do anything they can to extend taxation and control more people.

CC lockdowns coming to your area soon. Just wait.
 
Last edited:
Why don't we focus on the things that I listed. Do you think there are accomplishments worth boasting about?
I've not been very impressed by President Biden's accomplishments overall, yet I suspect I would still have a more generous take than you on every one of them.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Fourteen44
Scientists cannot even agree on the age of the earth so judging the climate on a planet based on the collection of data from 0.000000033% of earth's existence hardly proves a theory. BTW - 1923 was hotter than this summer..yet there were far fewer people/cars/carbon fuel sources then....

"In 1650 the Earth was 4,654 years old. In 1864 it was 100 million years old. In 1897 the upper limit was revised to 40 million years. Currently we believe the age to be about 4.5 billion years. What will be the best guess in the year 2050?" ...this was 2021

Today science moved the universe from 13 billion years to 26 billion....science changes all the time...thats why we cannot say the cause is human based...btw...CO2 is 0.04% of atmospheric gases.....

Fear controls the population...just read the Crichton Book - State of Fear...

How are you coming up w/ that % in the very same sentence you're saying there's no consensus on the Earth's age?
Considering that human life has existed for a tiny portion of Earth's existence, are you holding our lack of data collected from before we existed?
Ima need those receipts on 1923. Says here that you're laughably wrong. And here. And here.
 
How are you coming up w/ that % in the very same sentence you're saying there's no consensus on the Earth's age?
Considering that human life has existed for a tiny portion of Earth's existence, are you holding our lack of data collected from before we existed?
Ima need those receipts on 1923. Says here that you're laughably wrong. And here. And here.
150 yrs of climate data is generally used to show climate change....the world is now apparently 4.5B yrs old...do the math. ....many record highs are from 100 years ago...but I see you are a believer so there isnt really anything i can give you as a receipt you would believe.

From one of your sources.....earth has seen way hotter extremes....given the age of the planet. We are a speck on the timeline...but think we are to blame...lol


We've also been colder....

Between 600 and 800 million years ago—a period of time geologists call the Neoproterozoic—evidence suggests the Earth underwent an ice age so cold that ice sheets not only capped the polar latitudes but may have extended all the way to sea level near the equator.

To say we are doing this is a stretch

More back and forth is frivolous so I will let it go...pls drive your EV responsibly
 
I've not been very impressed by President Biden's accomplishments overall, yet I suspect I would still have a more generous take than you on every one of them.
How hard is it for you to not deflect or try to change the discussion? My post was based on specific points. You chose to quote it, I didn't direct it at you. If you don’t have anything to say on the points made, then why waste your time replying to it?

But to comment on your point. If you don’t think that Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country, then yes. I would imagine that you would have a more generous take on his presidency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
Not a Republican here, just someone who follows science and logic. Man-driven CC is a farce, but they’ll do anything they can to extend taxation and control more people.

CC lockdowns coming to your area soon. Just wait.
Oh my bad. I forgot you specifically identify as a transphobic, anti-intellectual, anti-vaccination, climate change denying, free-thinking independent. Though shorthand for that is typically Republican and sometimes Libertarian.

You follow science and logic, yet deny it when science says climate change is caused by pollutants from vehicles.
 
Last edited:
How hard is it for you to not deflect or try to change the discussion? My post was based on specific points. You chose to quote it, I didn't direct it at you. If you don’t have anything to say on the points made, then why waste your time replying to it?

But to comment on your point. If you don’t think that Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country, then yes. I would imagine that you would have a more generous take on his presidency.
You use such extremist language, then wonder why there's no point addressing it w/o being in 100% lockstep w/ you.
 
You use such extremist language, then wonder why there's no point addressing it w/o being in 100% lockstep w/ you.
There was zero extremist language. You just don't want to address the points. Which is fine. Just don't get why you would waste your time replying to begin with.
 
I've not been very impressed by President Biden's accomplishments overall, yet I suspect I would still have a more generous take than you on every one of them.
This is about as good a take on Ol Joe as anyone right of center can expect.
 
150 yrs of climate data is generally used to show climate change....the world is now apparently 4.5B yrs old...do the math. ....many record highs are from 100 years ago...but I see you are a believer so there isnt really anything i can give you as a receipt you would believe.

From one of your sources.....earth has seen way hotter extremes....given the age of the planet. We are a speck on the timeline...but think we are to blame...lol


We've also been colder....

Between 600 and 800 million years ago—a period of time geologists call the Neoproterozoic—evidence suggests the Earth underwent an ice age so cold that ice sheets not only capped the polar latitudes but may have extended all the way to sea level near the equator.

To say we are doing this is a stretch

More back and forth is frivolous so I will let it go...pls drive your EV responsibly
When it's convenient you throw around all these different ages for the Earth to muddy the waters, then you pluck one figure when it's convenient for you to look like you're being oh so precise.

The very article you link explains that during those extreme climates of 100s of millions of years ago we were still experiencing collisions with other cosmic objects, including one that likely formed the Moon. Referring to that time is kind of like a landscaper claiming erosion was worse when the land for a neighborhood was clearcut.

Very last sentence of the very article you linked? "But as greenhouse-gas emissions warm Earth’s climate, it's possible our planet has seen its last glaciation for a long time." From the article you cited. And guess where greenhouse gases come from?

Why is it so easy for conservative Americans to believe that the entire rest of the world is wrong but they're right?

Your second link doesn't work.

So... 1923?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Fourteen44
There was zero extremist language. You just don't want to address the points. Which is fine. Just don't get why you would waste your time replying to begin with.
You: "Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country..."

As for wasting time... a search for my posts in this forum reveals that I've made 26 posts since the beginning of July. You've made 94 in the same timeframe.
 
Why is it so easy for conservative Americans to believe that the entire rest of the world is wrong but they're right?
You think it's just conservative Americans who think that climate change initiatives are money grabbing hoaxes? Climate change is real. Always has been. Only the extreme lunatics think that climate change is not real or that it is real and is caused by humans. And crippling economic growth and making energy and travel unaffordable for a large percentage of the population is the only way to resolve it. The world is full of followers who think that they are following leaders who have good intentions. The people screaming in your ear about carbon footprints and emissions are the ones who leave the biggest carbon footprint. It's comical how many people have fallen for this scam.
 
You: "Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country..."

As for wasting time... a search for my posts in this forum reveals that I've made 26 posts since the beginning of July. You've made 94 in the same timeframe.
More deflections and irrelevant points that have nothing to do with what we are talking about. Why? I will at least admit that most of my posts, maybe all ITT, are a waste of time. But that's what I am doing here. Wasting time. And?

Can you tell me one thing that Biden (himself) has done that has made a positive difference to our country?
 
Only the extreme lunatics think that climate change is ...real and is caused by humans.
Umm... pretty sure that's what almost the entire world believes, including the people who study it for a living. Conservative Americans are the exception.

Why is it easier for you to believe it's a money-making hoax than that it's real and people just didn't care until they found a way to monetize it?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Fourteen44
Can you tell me one thing that Biden (himself) has done that has made a positive difference to our country?
We've been here before: I list something and you dismiss it. You've already dismissed every possible answer and will not budge from the stance that "Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country..."

I'm not responsible for convincing you of a thing. You're not challenging me to debate; you're daring me to hit my head against a brick wall. No, thanks. To be clear: You're an extremist shill w/ no intellectual nuance and should do better.
 
Umm... pretty sure that's what almost the entire world believes, including the people who study it for a living. Conservative Americans are the exception.

Why is it easier for you to believe it's a money-making hoax than that it's real and people just didn't care until they found a way to monetize it?
Because the people who benefit from it financially, including the scientists who toe the line in order to keep their funding, are the ones who leave the biggest carbon footprint. I addressed this.
 
We've been here before: I list something and you dismiss it. You've already dismissed every possible answer and will not budge from the stance that "Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country..."

I'm not responsible for convincing you of a thing. You're not challenging me to debate; you're daring me to hit my head against a brick wall. No, thanks. To be clear: You're an extremist shill w/ no intellectual nuance and should do better.
Then we can stop talking about this.
 
Because the people who benefit from it financially, including the scientists who toe the line in order to keep their funding, are the ones who leave the biggest carbon footprint. I addressed this.
That doesn't have anything to do w/ proving it's a hoax. It isn't.
 
Then we can stop talking about this.
I'm talking about exactly what I feel like talking about.

If "Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country..." why would you bother asking anyone to demonstrate otherwise? You're not open to it. You've settled.
 
I'm talking about exactly what I feel like talking about.

If "Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country..." why would you bother asking anyone to demonstrate otherwise? You're not open to it. You've settled.
You're a strange cat, dattier.
 
That doesn't have anything to do w/ proving it's a hoax. It isn't.
You asked me why I thought it was a money making hoax. I cannot prove to you it is a hoax any more than you can prove that Biden isn't a complete failure who has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country.

How many doomsday predictions have to prove false for you to start questioning the motivation behind those predictions? How many politicians who push climate change initiatives that cripple the economy and hinder travel and famous people have to prove to be hypocrites with their private jets, million dollar yachts and gas guzzling SUVs in order for you to question their motivations?
 
Oh my bad. I forgot you specifically identify as a transphobic, anti-intellectual, anti-vaccination, climate change denying, free-thinking independent. Though shorthand for that is typically Republican and sometimes Libertarian.

You follow science and logic, yet deny it when science says climate change is caused by pollutants from vehicles.
I’m transphobic? Or trans-grooming-phobic?

I’m anti-vax? Because I called out the massive failures of mRNA inoculations? Where have I bashed real vaccines?

I denied natural climate change? Not one person has proven man-driven climate change. Not one. Instead they seek to tax and control more and more.

No, I’m definitely not a Republican, but it’s the only thing you can grasp to.

Your idiocy just grows and grows 😂
 
I'm talking about exactly what I feel like talking about.

If "Biden has been a complete failure that has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country..." why would you bother asking anyone to demonstrate otherwise? You're not open to it. You've settled.
He hasn’t done one thing to make us better. Not one single thing. 😂
 
Umm... pretty sure that's what almost the entire world believes, including the people who study it for a living. Conservative Americans are the exception.

Why is it easier for you to believe it's a money-making hoax than that it's real and people just didn't care until they found a way to monetize it?
Almost the entire world believes…..meaning less than half lmfao
 
You asked me why I thought it was a money making hoax. I cannot prove to you it is a hoax any more than you can prove that Biden isn't a complete failure who has literally done nothing to make a positive change on our country.

How many doomsday predictions have to prove false for you to start questioning the motivation behind those predictions? How many politicians who push climate change initiatives that cripple the economy and hinder travel and famous people have to prove to be hypocrites with their private jets, million dollar yachts and gas guzzling SUVs in order for you to question their motivations?
We kind of can prove(and we have) that Biden's administration has been a bit better than a complete failure who has literally done nothing to make a positive change in our country. Fairly certain my first large post outlined a few very large positives from this administration.

That being said it's still not good enough and there are probably more of us than not from the left who rather someone other than Biden be in charge. But at the end of the day we can't let perfect be the enemy of good.

As far as doomsday predictions regarding climate change, most predictions expect the most catastrophic effects to be experienced 30+ years from now. It's already gotten bad in some places, catastrophically so, and it's only gonna get worse elsewhere as time goes on. The idea is to attack the problem before it gets to that point.
 
The idea is to attack the problem before it gets to that point.
Attacking the problem by enriching politicians and bought and paid for scientists all while duping society into believing they have to sacrifice wealth and freedoms in order to control something man has no control over.
 
We kind of can prove(and we have) that Biden's administration has been a bit better than a complete failure who has literally done nothing to make a positive change in our country. Fairly certain my first large post outlined a few very large positives from this administration.

That being said it's still not good enough and there are probably more of us than not from the left who rather someone other than Biden be in charge. But at the end of the day we can't let perfect be the enemy of good.

As far as doomsday predictions regarding climate change, most predictions expect the most catastrophic effects to be experienced 30+ years from now. It's already gotten bad in some places, catastrophically so, and it's only gonna get worse elsewhere as time goes on. The idea is to attack the problem before it gets to that point.
So the same ones who 40+ years ago said we’d have catastrophic outcomes today (and even sooner)? And where are things “catastrophic” today, especially outside of the normal patterns of the Earths climate?
 
I’m transphobic? Or trans-grooming-phobic?

I’m anti-vax? Because I called out the massive failures of mRNA inoculations? Where have I bashed real vaccines?

I denied natural climate change? Not one person has proven man-driven climate change. Not one. Instead they seek to tax and control more and more.

No, I’m definitely not a Republican, but it’s the only thing you can grasp to.

Your idiocy just grows and grows 😂
Transphobic. As in you have a disdain for trans people. Nothing to do with grooming. If you had an issue with grooming you certainly wouldn't be voting for Trump again would you?

Two dose vaccines massively cut hospitalizations and severe issues from Covid.

They definitely have proven man-driven climate change. I've shown evidence that they have multiple times in this very thread.

You're not a Republican, you just happen to side with them on every major issue.
 
Attacking the problem by enriching politicians and bought and paid for scientists all while duping society into believing they have to sacrifice wealth and freedoms in order to control something man has no control over.
What wealth and freedoms do we need to sacrifice in order to combat climate change? Charging your car instead of driving to a pump is really that big of a loss of freedom for you?

And again you're not providing any evidence to support your assertion that man has no effect on climate change.
 
So the same ones who 40+ years ago said we’d have catastrophic outcomes today (and even sooner)? And where are things “catastrophic” today, especially outside of the normal patterns of the Earths climate?

"Pakistan is only responsible for 0.3 percent of global emissions thus far, and yet is disproportionately and adversely affected by climate change through increased variability and extremes in weather. In 2022, climate change increased extreme monsoon rainfall, ultimately causing the floods"
 
What wealth and freedoms do we need to sacrifice in order to combat climate change? Charging your car instead of driving to a pump is really that big of a loss of freedom for you?

And again you're not providing any evidence to support your assertion that man has no effect on climate change.
Look at how much an EV with any real size and range will cost you. It is unaffordable for a large portion of the population. The war against crude oil and the hindering of the supply is making gas and diesel too expensive for a large portion of the population to do any major traveling. This is also causing the increase in the price of every day needs. It's not hard to see how it is a sacrifice of wealth and freedoms.

I am not here to provide suckers evidence that man is not causing climate change to the extent you guys try to convince us.
 

"Pakistan is only responsible for 0.3 percent of global emissions thus far, and yet is disproportionately and adversely affected by climate change through increased variability and extremes in weather. In 2022, climate change increased extreme monsoon rainfall, ultimately causing the floods"
That’s your sourced example for man-made climate change? Oh you sad, poor little boy🤦🏻‍♂️

Ps I’m really glad they sourced all 4.5b years of data in that article. Oh, wait…..
 
Transphobic. As in you have a disdain for trans people. Nothing to do with grooming. If you had an issue with grooming you certainly wouldn't be voting for Trump again would you?

Two dose vaccines massively cut hospitalizations and severe issues from Covid.

They definitely have proven man-driven climate change. I've shown evidence that they have multiple times in this very thread.

You're not a Republican, you just happen to side with them on every major issue.
Cite where I’m transphobic and not anti-grooming. I’ll wait. Voting for Trump has what to do with grooming, exactly?

Massively? Ahahaaaahaaaa, cite your clinical proof. I’ll wait. And “2 dose” is now the magic number? Explain.

You haven’t presented anything but subjective pieces without any source of scientific validation. Nice try, though.

So one has to pick a side to have an opinion? Wow, that genius-level thinking there 😂
 
NEW - Pfizer officials, at a Senate hearing in Australia, say their employees were given a special batch of vaccine, not the one which was rolled out to the public.



@disclosetv
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT