state/fed can pay for it or is? can is your assumption and not happening yet, is is fact.....screwing kids how? in the face of uncertainty at the time...kids lost 2.5 months in 2019-2020 and the best effort was made considering in the hybrid 2020-2021 school year, which does still equate to 1.5 years of def missing normal instruction...some had it worse than others, some better....you can cite all you want, i didn't, i know better, free to have your own opinion, and ill let it go too
They do pay for, but as I stated they have the right to review it (can). You don’t know much about healthcare and/or reimbursement so I’ll gladly educate you here.
Better to keep them in public housing and in terrible school districts. More likely to keep voting Democrat. Plus, if they owned a home they’d have to pay taxes and may start voting GOP
Opinion in telling me what I meant in regards to time lost...you getting real condescending which doesn't help w/ dialouge....
You thinking I’m condescending is yet another opinion. I’m just setting things straight.
This is a 100% tell that you’re about to spin some phrasing as sensationalist as possible. 🙄
I’m not sure what you’re referring to by quoting “So you do agree that-“. I never recall ever using those words in this thread. I’ve never mentioned Obama and guns. I’m sorry you feel triggered.
It's amazing how that little Castro wannabe is praised by the progressives. If you spoke out against vandalism and violence during the riots over a fentanyl overdose, you were against people's right to peacefully protest. Meanwhile, lil Castro destroyed the lives of protesters and the livelihoods of anyone who stood by them in an actual peaceful protest. But hey, he is front and center at the pride rallies.
You understand exactly why I think he’s spinning it, and you know very well that refusing to take spun bait is a legitimate response/nonresponse.
The housing crisis of 2008 stands as one example where a Republican was in charge. Lower income people were preyed upon leading up to that. They got into homes for a minute, but I hardly think that really counts as a feather in the GOP’s hat.
Oh the idiocy here - the banks, led by mostly Leftists pushed for SISA loans, increasing the DTI requirements, and lowering credit thresholds. Now? Biden is penalizing strong credit borrowers and cheapening money for low credit borrowers. You really struggle with financial concepts lol.
Right...see how that works, you have an opinion that I only meant 2.5 months, when I clearly know I was also including the following year cause it all goes together...👍🏾
Not just that, Richard Levine as well…..come on now.
www.instagram.com
as you point out -the missing element is context....as Disraeli said "There are lies, damn lies and statistics"
Hadn't cosigned anything on Levine...you said doing a horrible job, I asked show...you did and gave all your opinions and thoughtsNot just that, Richard Levine as well…..come on now.
Ps this is for you, all of you that comply so easily….
Lennie Moreno on Instagram: "We must always find the positive in a negative situation. ___ #truth #motivation #leadership #success #history #matrix #mindset #strength #positivity"
253K likes, 8,553 comments - lennieboy on July 21, 2023: "We must always find the positive in a negative situation. ___ #truth #motivation #leadership #success #history #matrix #mindset #strength #positivity".
Thank heavens the Fed is actively putting the brakes on inflation. Current administration cannot take any credit for that.
No question President Biden's administration spins things to look more favorable. Assuming that's the case is also a very convenient way to discredit any and every thing they claim to have accomplished.
theconversation.com
Why don't we focus on the things that I listed. Do you think there are accomplishments worth boasting about?
So in 1980 a Stanford scientist has a theory, and the API, and everyone else should just buy it hook, line, and sinker and change the entire energy sector? Just want to make sure I have the entire thesis here correct. And I don’t even know what you’re talking about with regards to the tax cuts and Exxon Mobile and Shell.What Big Oil knew about climate change, in its own words
Transcripts and internal documents show how the industry shifted from leading research into fossil fuels’ effect on the climate to sowing doubt about science.
"By the late 1970s, the American Petroleum Institute had formed a secret committee called the “CO2 and Climate Task Force,” which included representatives of many of the major oil companies, to privately monitor and discuss the latest developments in climate science.
In 1980, the task force invited a scientist from Stanford University, John Laurmann, to brief them on the state of climate science. Today, we have a copy of Laurmann’s presentation, which warned that if fossil fuels continued to be used, global warming would be “barely noticeable” by 2005, but by the 2060s would have “globally catastrophic effects.” That same year, the American Petroleum Institute called on governments to triple coal production worldwide, insisting there would be no negative consequences despite what it knew internally."
And thanks to tRumps Tax Cuts and Jobs Acts these companies who rape our planet like ExxonMobil and Shell get to pay a whopping 14% less in corporate tax. All while raking in record shattering profits every quarter.
Another short sighted law from a Republican that will benefit the upper middle class in the short term, while helping to erode what few social safety nets we have in this country for the lower middle class and poor.
It's also helped these oil companies push the gas pedal to the floor on climate change. But hey, gotta think of those poor shareholders, amirite guys?
It wasn't just a theory. It was backed up by evidence from our atmosphere, and it wasn't just some Stanford scientist either, it was reps from these oil companies saying the same thing. But that would've gotten in the way of profits so naturally they've spent the following four decades trying to downplay the effects and keep everyone chained to their product.
So if it wasn’t just a theory then it would be a scientific fact. I’ve yet to see a scientific proof that proves what this Stanford scientist’s theory states.
It literally has been proven. The Co2 released from vehicles rises into atmosphere, there it stays for a very long time. It lets heat from the sun in, then traps it inside. Hence the term "greenhouse gases" because Co2 acts like a greenhouse, but for the whole planet. This is a proven, scientific fact.
And what’s the solution again? Electric vehicles? Wind? Solar? Everyone ride bikes? Btw be careful, the first three have massive environmental consequences for a variety of reasons based on your CO2 greenhouse “facts”.
Amazing. So because scientists change what they think based on newly available information, they surely must be incorrect about everything and we should just trust what you say based on the fact that you have the ability to cherry pick completely unrelated information and throw it together in a pitiful attempt at creating a coherent argument? Think I'll pass thanks, and I'll just create my opinion based on 60 years of research from the experts in this field rather than some random person who can't even back up their argument with any relevant facts on a basketball message board.
