NCAAT/Game 37 - Arizona vs. Duke - Sweet 16 - 9:39 p.m., 3/27
- By ConorONeill
- Devil Insider
- 19 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Barely a minute in and they're putting the word "killing" in quotation marks.There are other docs that aren't as long. But this is the best way to see all aspects that go against the mainstream narrative.
Login to view embedded media
Is it possible due to the high publicity, highly emotional state of many, that Chauvin was in a no win situation? Is it also possible that if evidence found him to not be guilty, that rioting, looting, and major property damage would have happened?No & no. I believe my eyes and the autopsies, though.
I'm very close friends with truth.So you're not into the truth. Got it.
Oh, okay. How about making fun of a disabled reporter? How about alluding to 2nd Amendment fans killing Hillary Clinton? How about feuding with a Gold Star family? How many examples do you need for it to surpass Rep Crockett's single comment?When Trump calls Warren Pocohantas or the gov of Calif Newscum you could argue it’s unpresidential or in poor taste, but you can’t conflate those two examples with what Crockett said.
So you're not into the truth. Got it.No & no. I believe my eyes and the autopsies, though.
No & no. I believe my eyes and the autopsies, though.Is this really a far fetched theory in your mind, or are you this confident in the justice system?
He got the verdict he wanted. You think anyone on the Left gives a damn about the rule of law? Look at the sham trials 45/47 had to sit through. Banana republic level kangaroo courtsThe answer to the questions I asked is because he wasn't given a fair Trial. The country couldn't handle a not guilty verdict and if the jury was presented with the things that were not allowed by the judge at the request of the prosecution, there might have been doubt casted on Chauvin's actual role in Floyd's death.
Is this really a far fetched theory in your mind, or are you this confident in the justice system?
According to her Twitter she was liking the nickname Hot Wheels for Gov Abbott before he started busing illegals.but Trump can call and make names for all the people that he has????
her words:
"I wasn’t thinking about the governor’s condition -- I was thinking about the planes, trains, and automobiles he used to transfer migrants into communities led by Black mayors, deliberately stoking tension and fear among the most vulnerable," Crockett wrote in a post on X. "Literally, the next line I said was that he was a “hot a-- Mess,” referencing his terrible policies."
Crockett added that the outrage was "another distraction," going on to highlight Gov. Abbott's policy of bussing migrants who had been released from federal custody to other states.
"Finally, this is yet another distraction. Instead of obsessing over and hanging on to my every word, maybe my political foes should focus on doing the work of the people who elected us to improve their lives."
“At no point did I mention or allude to his condition,” Crockett continued. “So, I’m even more appalled that the very people who unequivocally support Trump -- a man known for racially insensitive nicknames and mocking those with disabilities -- are now outraged.”
Yes. Libs are more loyal than a dog. A shame they aren't nearly as smart.Loyalty, but also complicity.
When Trump calls Warren Pocohantas or the gov of Calif Newscum you could argue it’s unpresidential or in poor taste, but you can’t conflate those two examples with what Crockett said.^More than you'll ever say about Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene or Rep Lauren Boebert.
Datt believes in the justice system when he's told it's fair. It really is that simple.The answer to the questions I asked is because he wasn't given a fair Trial. The country couldn't handle a not guilty verdict and if the jury was presented with the things that were not allowed by the judge at the request of the prosecution, there might have been doubt casted on Chauvin's actual role in Floyd's death.
Is this really a far fetched theory in your mind, or are you this confident in the justice system?
Loyalty, but also complicity.They have to tip toe around Covid, especially with how bad the kids got screwed. They can't admit it. Can't. If they were to, then their argument starts to unravel. These are the same people that have found a way to say Biden wasn't that bad until....
Their loyalty to the Party is unmatched. It's almost admirable.
Well, at least you're not stupid enough to buy her explanation.I don't buy her explanation and it was an ugly thing to say. The hypocrisy of conservative jowl-wagging when they delight in the things our President says of a similar ilk is further evidence of poor self-reflection on the right.
The answer to the questions I asked is because he wasn't given a fair Trial. The country couldn't handle a not guilty verdict and if the jury was presented with the things that were not allowed by the judge at the request of the prosecution, there might have been doubt casted on Chauvin's actual role in Floyd's death.I generally trust the court system, particularly when it comes to privileged people.
Do you already have answers to your rhetorical questions? Does it add up to the whole trial's being a sham?
Why is it that everytime you post a rational comment you have to give your self a pat on the back before we’ve had time to respond?^More than you'll ever say about Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene or Rep Lauren Boebert.
Notice how @KDSTONE ignored or you might say evaded my post^
I'm not asking you to validate it; do you even know?