ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

There are other docs that aren't as long. But this is the best way to see all aspects that go against the mainstream narrative.

Login to view embedded media
Barely a minute in and they're putting the word "killing" in quotation marks.
Before the 2 minute mark they're reviewing Floyd's legal history, a classic tactic in telling the narrative of "he deserved it." The most saintly among us are able to get justice pretty easily. You don't have to be squeaky clean to deserve justice.
4 minutes in and the officer has pulled his gun.
5 1/2 minutes in and they're nitpicking over when his mom died.

Seriously, how do you not see through this crap? How are these not obvious red flags for you?

Alpha News: "Overall, we rate Alpha News Questionable based on extreme right bias, poor sourcing of information, promotion of conspiracy theories, and anti-Islamic propaganda, as well as a lack of transparency regarding ownership."

Seriously, are you even trying? A "Questionable" rating is even worse than an "Extreme Left" or "Extreme Right" rating. There are plenty of rightwing media that have high credibility. This ain't one of them.

The New Lounge

No & no. I believe my eyes and the autopsies, though.
Is it possible due to the high publicity, highly emotional state of many, that Chauvin was in a no win situation? Is it also possible that if evidence found him to not be guilty, that rioting, looting, and major property damage would have happened?

I'm not holding my breath thinking you'll be open minded though. That goes back to what I said earlier, that if you were to consider those, then that would mean you'd have to consider you've been buying lies for a long time.

The New Lounge

When Trump calls Warren Pocohantas or the gov of Calif Newscum you could argue it’s unpresidential or in poor taste, but you can’t conflate those two examples with what Crockett said.
Oh, okay. How about making fun of a disabled reporter? How about alluding to 2nd Amendment fans killing Hillary Clinton? How about feuding with a Gold Star family? How many examples do you need for it to surpass Rep Crockett's single comment?

The New Lounge

The answer to the questions I asked is because he wasn't given a fair Trial. The country couldn't handle a not guilty verdict and if the jury was presented with the things that were not allowed by the judge at the request of the prosecution, there might have been doubt casted on Chauvin's actual role in Floyd's death.

Is this really a far fetched theory in your mind, or are you this confident in the justice system?
He got the verdict he wanted. You think anyone on the Left gives a damn about the rule of law? Look at the sham trials 45/47 had to sit through. Banana republic level kangaroo courts
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Mac9192 and Dattier

The New Lounge

but Trump can call and make names for all the people that he has????

her words:
"I wasn’t thinking about the governor’s condition -- I was thinking about the planes, trains, and automobiles he used to transfer migrants into communities led by Black mayors, deliberately stoking tension and fear among the most vulnerable," Crockett wrote in a post on X. "Literally, the next line I said was that he was a “hot a-- Mess,” referencing his terrible policies."

Crockett added that the outrage was "another distraction," going on to highlight Gov. Abbott's policy of bussing migrants who had been released from federal custody to other states.

"Finally, this is yet another distraction. Instead of obsessing over and hanging on to my every word, maybe my political foes should focus on doing the work of the people who elected us to improve their lives."

“At no point did I mention or allude to his condition,” Crockett continued. “So, I’m even more appalled that the very people who unequivocally support Trump -- a man known for racially insensitive nicknames and mocking those with disabilities -- are now outraged.”
According to her Twitter she was liking the nickname Hot Wheels for Gov Abbott before he started busing illegals.
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192 and KDSTONE

The New Lounge

The answer to the questions I asked is because he wasn't given a fair Trial. The country couldn't handle a not guilty verdict and if the jury was presented with the things that were not allowed by the judge at the request of the prosecution, there might have been doubt casted on Chauvin's actual role in Floyd's death.

Is this really a far fetched theory in your mind, or are you this confident in the justice system?
Datt believes in the justice system when he's told it's fair. It really is that simple.

The New Lounge

I generally trust the court system, particularly when it comes to privileged people.
Do you already have answers to your rhetorical questions? Does it add up to the whole trial's being a sham?
The answer to the questions I asked is because he wasn't given a fair Trial. The country couldn't handle a not guilty verdict and if the jury was presented with the things that were not allowed by the judge at the request of the prosecution, there might have been doubt casted on Chauvin's actual role in Floyd's death.

Is this really a far fetched theory in your mind, or are you this confident in the justice system?
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE

The New Lounge

^More than you'll ever say about Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene or Rep Lauren Boebert.
Why is it that everytime you post a rational comment you have to give your self a pat on the back before we’ve had time to respond?
If Taylor Greene makes fun of people in wheelchairs, I’ll be sure to call her out.
I tune a lot of what she says out anyway. Not that familiar with the other one
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT