GhostOf301 said:

Nope. It won't matter how many times this lie is debunked, you guys will just keep repeating as if it were true.

Click to expand...

The lie was that he said Nazis were very fine people. He indeed equivocated when he made the "both sides" statement, despite one side deserving 99% of the blame.

I'm acknowledging the lie. Why can't you acknowledge the truth?

bleediteveryday30 said:

I met Dave Odom the other day in the grocery store. He farted in my presence. But nice nonetheless.

Click to expand...

Ewwwwww bleed!!!! Dave Odor.

OFC

Put 5 republicans in a room and bring up politics. There will eventually be a heated argument. Put 5 democrats in a room and bring up politics. They'll sound like robots reading from the same book.

surfdevil said:

FYI the women's bball beat the wolf puppies today to win the ACC tourney. congrats to Kara and the ladies!
also well over 11,000 at the game today so good turnout.

Click to expand...

Amen surf!

Question for anyone but Dattier. Have liberals always been as intellectually dishonest as him? I feel like it hasn’t always been this way. I go back and forth between whether they believe what they are saying or just flat out lying. When did this change? It seems you used to be able to have reasonable conversations with them. Is it simply TDS? Is it that the left’s ideologies have gotten so out of hand that they have to lie and bypass reality to stay in line with their marching orders? I mean most of them refuse to even define what a women is because they are so invested in their script.

Thoughts?

Dattier said:

Yes. Yes, it is. He said there were good people on both sides as a deflection when he was being pushed to denounce white nationalism. He didn't say there were good Nazis, but it was a moment that called for a strong denouncement of one side and one side only, and he didn't.

Click to expand...

Nope. It won't matter how many times this lie is debunked, you guys will just keep repeating as if it were true.

Dahntay#1 said:

I’m legitimately asking a question here.

Click to expand...

No, you aren't, because no matter what I say -- and I've already demonstrated many times over how I address the rest of that grade school lesson you're trying to act wise with -- you're going to claim to already know what I know and how I think, call me a sheep, and throw out backhanded compliments like how I'm halfway smart or something, like you're an authority on that.

KDSTONE said:

“If they ever get around to it all”. lol.
Guess since the election has come and gone, it doesn’t seem so urgent after all

Click to expand...

No, since the election and the SCOUTUS ruling granting him so much immunity, there's no point to trying now. A sitting President is not going to face sentencing for a conviction that didn't prevent him from being elected. Don't pretend the SDNY actually has a choice now.

dukesince91 said:

No need to waste my time with you. Like I said before, you get off on being a jerk.

Click to expand...

It would logically follow, then, that you get off on being an intellectual coward.
Personally, I don't think either of us has much of a clue what the other gets off on, but if that's where you want to go...

GhostOf301 said:

Is this what he was doing, though? Is it.....

Click to expand...

Yes. Yes, it is. He said there were good people on both sides as a deflection when he was being pushed to denounce white nationalism. He didn't say there were good Nazis, but it was a moment that called for a strong denouncement of one side and one side only, and he didn't.