ADVERTISEMENT

x factors and Sam Dekker question

ioliva

Devils Illustrated Hall of Famer
Jul 30, 2009
6,788
1,636
113
We all know that Winslow is the biggest x factor on our team but I feel as if we overlook Matt Jones as an x factor. Kid plays hard defense, gives off solid hustle ability and has a knack for being in the right place at the right time. I really like his game and he's been awesome since given a chance to do some damage. In all honesty I hope he guards kaminsky. He kept losing the ball yesterday against pressure and I'm sure Matt can do a better job than UK did yesterday.

Question : just heard that Sam Dekker was hurt during the first match up? I thought he was injured later in the season
 
I agree I think Matt is a key tomorrow also....but my question about Matt is.....he came out of HS as a great shooter(maybe the best in his class) but his shot looks awful and he is far from a great shooter so far....like amile does a lot of little things that don't show up in the boxscore....i know he don't really need to score alot but i'm trying to figure out how he was such a great shooter coming out of HS
 
Dekker was about 70% the first matchup. He will be a much bigger factor this go-round.

This post was edited on 4/5 5:42 PM by HeLooks2MuchLikeDave
 
Here's the link to the first game on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5QaQKEwoHME

That's right Dekker was about 70%, it said in the post game notes that he was hampered by a sprained ankle. We switched like crazy during the game, which the Badgers didn't really expect and gave them fits. There were a number of times where Quinn switched and found himself being posted up by Kaminsky or guarding Dekker on the perimeter. We also used a number of different defenders on Dekker, including Justise for large stretches of the second half, as well as Jones, Quinn and Sulaimon.

If Justise puts the glove on Dekker, there's a good chance we will win. We might even be okay if Dekker goes for 25 or so, as long as we can limit their shooters like Koenig and Jackson. In the first game, Jackson hit a number of open threes. It'll be interesting to see how many minutes he will get tomorrow night.

We were also great at helping on Kaminsky and recovering to get back out on the perimeter shooters when he kicked it out. There were a few times when the triple team got to Kaminsky real quickly and he lost the ball or made a bad pass due to the pressure.

Not having Sulaimon hurts because of his on-ball pressure and his ability to defend Wisconsin's big men. But Jackson isn't fully recovered from his foot injury and isn't the same player he was in December. Allen's play tomorrow night on the defensive end will be huge. Jones and Allen are filling the minutes that were occupied by Sulaimon and both will have to be disruptive against the Badgers' bigs on switches.

On the other end, Okafor can score at will against Kaminsky down low. We need to constantly feed the post and go through him on offense. He might even be able to get Kaminsky in foul trouble. In Game 1, Okafor probably could have finished with 20 if he didn't get two fouls early in the first half. I can see him going for about 22 and 15. Wisconsin hasn't been great on D throughout the tourney. They're on this run because Dekker is carrying his team on his back and because they've had stretches where they haven't missed from beyond the arc. If they decide to double and triple Okafor, we will get tons of open looks. I think we'll win by four or five in a tight, well-played game.
 
I would think that Grayson could be a surprise "X" factor in this game, especially with the confidence he has going to the basket. He was fearless against MSU, and will hit the boards also.
Dekker was injured the first go around, but he is definitely a key in this game, not an "X" factor (because he is a star), but if we do not keep him at bay, it will be a long night.
Go Duke!!


JC-OFC
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT