ADVERTISEMENT

THR (Comedy Central) says the funniest things

acc hoops

Cameron Crazy
Mar 24, 2004
1,939
1,145
113
I chuckled when some clown posted UNC is better than Arizona because they gave the Badgers a tougher game. They even say their defense is better because Badgers could not make 3's. I would have loved to have seen Zona punished UNC bigs. If the refs had let them play we would have heard whining like never before.
This morning I got another good laugh as I see they are saying the 2009 UNC team is better than Kentucky. I especially like one reason being "Bobby Frasor who was an All American in high school" and because of "Tyler Hanesbrough who is arguably the best college player ever".
The Carolina Way lives on even after the men's and women's team lose in the same weekend.
 
Jesus. Wisconsin had an off night and still beat the Holes. If they had been on like they were last night they'd have beaten unc by 25.
 
The Heels maybe played their best game all season and still lost to the Badgers who were broke on open jumpers all night. Both Wisconsin and Arizona were clearly better than them.

As for the 2009 Heels vs. 2015 'Cats argument....I would reluctantly take the Heels. More polished and veteran squad....plus their backcourt would be much better than UKs.
 
I don't care if UK wins the whole thing, I still don't think they go down as the best team ever.
 
I too would take the 09 Heels over this UK team.
 
Unlv
Duke 92
Duke 01
Duke 10
UNC 09
UMD 02

Should I continue? All better than this UK team.
 
There's a wicked case of Vaginitis over there now.

A quick summary:

*Easy Region. (the usual excuse)
*Refs (see above)
*Tyus flops
*Okafor travels on every play (See Hansblow)
*Refs (gotta go with your "strength")
*Easy Region again.

God I love their misery,
 
th
OFC
 
I liked Kentucky in 1996 and 2012 a little better than the current team. They have lots of wins against teams in the 25-50 range, but last Saturday was UK's 1st against a Top-10 team in the KenPom rankings. I would still favor UK a little, but I do think they can be beaten not only by Wisconsin - but also by Duke AND Michigan State.

UK is 1-0 vs. KenPom Top 10 teams while Duke is 5-2 (two losses of course were to ND).
 
Michigan St. is a very good team, but I don't see them beating UK. They can beat us and Wisconsin, but I question if they have the weapons to beat UK. Really, it's no different than 2009....I didn't think they had any chance to beat UNC that year either.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT