ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

Yeah, I want to see us bring democracy to Iran like we have all the other Middle Eastern countries we have invaded.
I don't want to see us bring democracy to Iran. I want to see the Iranian people take advantage of Israel's decision to take out their dictatorship and return to the freedom loving and thriving society from pre-1979 Iran.
 
You want empathy? Maybe next time avoid inflammatory language like “Supreme Leader”, cult, the dog comment. You came here itching for a fight and got it. Sorry you didn’t like the way it turned out.
Yeah, that's what I was doing. I don't ever want to fight. I just can't believe how dedicated to everything he says and does people are. It's nuts. Where I live people talk about him now second only to Christ. It's terrifying.
 
I don't want to see us bring democracy to Iran. I want to see the Iranian people take advantage of Israel's decision to take out their dictatorship and return to the freedom loving and thriving society from pre-1979 Iran.
Because that will work out. It sure has for every other country we have bombed in the region.
 
First. I am not sure whether I support this decision or not. Though, there isn't much of a chance of success without our technology.

But, you're off here. It is no more forever wars. Not no more foreign wars. I am not comfortable with the situation we are in now that we are involved. But there is nothing right now that suggest we will be involved in a forever war. You mocked the notion that now is the time for peace. We showed our capabilities and now have leverage in negotiations because they are no longer empty threats. I still believe that peace is the ultimate goal. I will believe that until I see ground troops being involved. If that happens, I will turn 100% against this administration.
True. The Left hasn’t shown an iota of concern for the half a million American citizens living in Israel. Not for the ones killed by attacks deliberately targeting civilians while Israel attacks military infrastructure such as launchers and ballistic missiles and nuclear sites.
Not for the ones at risk in the event of a nuclear attack.
No concern for their beloved Palestinians who would likely be killed by a nuclear attack by Iran.
No concern for the brave servicemen and women who carried out this historic operation today.
Only unhinged meltdowns, talks of impeachment, personal attacks. Par for the course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GhostOf301
He’s a dictator who does whatever he wants while at the same time being manipulated, what is it “cucked”, by the Israelis. I’m not sure what that means, but it sure doesn’t sound good.
The female cuckoo bird is known for changing mates often and for laying eggs in other birds' nests. Husbands whose wives cheat on them have been referred to as "cuckolds" since at least the 17th Century. In recent years that has been abbreviated to "cuck" and even turned into a verb, hence the past tense "cucked." Politically, it has been a term used to insinuate that a man is weak and does not conform to traditional social norms for men.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
Because that will work out. It sure has for every other country we have bombed in the region.
You make it sound like the carpet bombing of Dresden for Ch sake. It was a targeted attack of a rogue regime’s nuclear sites. No civilians killed that we know of. No boots on the ground.
 
We shall see. Troops or not, we will end up seeing another destabilized region. This time with over 90 million people. I mock it because it's wild to bomb a country and claim peace is now the answer. That's not how it works. Anyone who thinks Iran won't retaliate is being shortsighted. This could get ugly and fast.
Dude, Iran is the reason the region has been destabilized for decades. It is not even disputed that Iran is the number 1 sponsor of terrorism in the world. You're blaming us because Trump is the one who made the call. Your anger is influenced by your own biases. If you were to look at this as what is best for the world and America, you could see that Iran needed to be checked. But you're looking at it as how can we make Trump look like Hitler. You're ate up.
 
The female cuckoo bird is known for changing mates often and for laying eggs in other birds' nests. Husbands whose wives cheat on them have been referred to as "cuckolds" since at least the 17th Century. In recent years that has been abbreviated to "cuck" and even turned into a verb, hence the past tense "cucked." Politically, it has been a term used to insinuate that a man is weak and does not conform to traditional social norms for men.
If my English prof was lucid/ sober that particular week, I’m pretty sure it dated back to the Canterbury tales

Never heard it used quite that way.
 
I still believe that peace is the ultimate goal. I will believe that until I see ground troops being involved. If that happens, I will turn 100% against this administration.
Just bookmarking this, in case. And so that I can easily find it in a search...

candyman
candyman
candyman
 
Yeah, that's what I was doing. I don't ever want to fight. I just can't believe how dedicated to everything he says and does people are. It's nuts. Where I live people talk about him now second only to Christ. It's terrifying.
Fwiw, most of the people I know well are either Dems or non MAGA Rep. I support this operation and what he’s done on the border. But not a huge fan of the BBB or his tariff work. If you think the main conservative posters here are cultish I’d strongly beg to differ. I know I know, Datt, people in a cult don’t know they’re in a cult ha ha.
 
Fwiw, most of the people I know well are either Dems or non MAGA Rep. I support this operation and what he’s done on the border. But not a huge fan of the BBB or his tariff work. If you think the main conservative posters here are cultish I’d strongly beg to differ. I know I know, Datt, people in a cult don’t know they’re in a cult ha ha.
Well, when the cult is built around the illusion that we're all rugged individuals and self-made macho men who pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps, it's even harder for them to recognize they're in a cult. 🤷‍♂️
 
Dude, Iran is the reason the region has been destabilized for decades. It is not even disputed that Iran is the number 1 sponsor of terrorism in the world. You're blaming us because Trump is the one who made the call. Your anger is influenced by your own biases. If you were to look at this as what is best for the world and America, you could see that Iran needed to be checked. But you're looking at it as how can we make Trump look like Hitler. You're ate up.
What has bleed ever said to indicate he's a homer for all things Democratic and an anti-Trumper no matter what?
Did he say "Hitler"?

"It is not even disputed that Iran is the number 1 sponsor of terrorism in the world."
Really? A month ago, I don't know that I, for one, would have come to that conclusion. I might have guessed that a terrorist organization itself was the biggest sponsor for others, or that the old Syrian regime or some evasive, hard-to-pin-down entities in Iraq or Afghanistan were most responsible. I reject the idea that it's not even disputed, or that there is overwhelming consensus predating the last few months' build-up.
And your rhetoric... it strikes me as dangerously Orwellian, like you are rewriting the past to make the present more sensible.

"If you were to look at this as what is best for the world and America, you could see that Iran needed to be checked."
That assumes that everyone looks at it the same way. What that really means is that if he saw it like you see it, he'd think what you think.
 
What has bleed ever said to indicate he's a homer for all things Democratic and an anti-Trumper no matter what?
Did he say "Hitler"?

"It is not even disputed that Iran is the number 1 sponsor of terrorism in the world."
Really? A month ago, I don't know that I, for one, would have come to that conclusion. I might have guessed that a terrorist organization itself was the biggest sponsor for others, or that the old Syrian regime or some evasive, hard-to-pin-down entities in Iraq or Afghanistan were most responsible. I reject the idea that it's not even disputed, or that there is overwhelming consensus predating the last few months' build-up.
And your rhetoric... it strikes me as dangerously Orwellian, like you are rewriting the past to make the present more sensible.

"If you were to look at this as what is best for the world and America, you could see that Iran needed to be checked."
That assumes that everyone looks at it the same way. What that really means is that if he saw it like you see it, he'd think what you think.
Where did I accuse him of being a Homer for all things democratic? He's an anti Trumper, no doubt.

You mentioned Syria and Afghanistan. What's funny about that is Iran has their hands all in those countries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
Where did I accuse him of being a Homer for all things democratic? He's an anti Trumper, no doubt.

You mentioned Syria and Afghanistan. What's funny about that is Iran has their hands all in those countries.
What has bleed ever said to indicate he's a homer for all things Democratic and an anti-Trumper no matter what?
Did he say "Hitler"?

"It is not even disputed that Iran is the number 1 sponsor of terrorism in the world."
Really? A month ago, I don't know that I, for one, would have come to that conclusion. I might have guessed that a terrorist organization itself was the biggest sponsor for others, or that the old Syrian regime or some evasive, hard-to-pin-down entities in Iraq or Afghanistan were most responsible. I reject the idea that it's not even disputed, or that there is overwhelming consensus predating the last few months' build-up.
And your rhetoric... it strikes me as dangerously Orwellian, like you are rewriting the past to make the present more sensible.

"If you were to look at this as what is best for the world and America, you could see that Iran needed to be checked."
That assumes that everyone looks at it the same way. What that really means is that if he saw it like you see it, he'd think what you think.
There is consensus. Has been for a long time.
Even prior to Oct 7th. Not just Hamas but Hezbollah and the Houti’s as well.

Iraq and Afghanistan aren’t even designated state sponsors of terror. Name a single terrorist attack Cuba or North Korea has carried out lately.


 
Where did I accuse him of being a Homer for all things democratic? He's an anti Trumper, no doubt.

You mentioned Syria and Afghanistan. What's funny about that is Iran has their hands all in those countries.
They kinda go hand-in-hand. Even "anti-Trumper" is a dismissive generalization. As if the only reason a person dislikes something is because our President did it.

Same thing with the Hitler allegation: "[Y]ou're looking at it as how can we make Trump look like Hitler." Nobody does that. You have it backward. Some people truly think his actions look like Hitler, and then they say so. There is no premeditated conspiracy to spin something to make him look like Hitler. Hyperbole? Absolutely. But genuine.
 
There is consensus. Has been for a long time.
I very specifically said that I, personally, as an individual, might not have guessed Iran as my top guess as recently as a month ago. I think the claim that it is a consensus is a convenient assumption along the lines of asking why IAEA suddenly cited them.
 
I very specifically said that I, personally, as an individual, might not have guessed Iran as my top guess as recently as a month ago. I think the claim that it is a consensus is a convenient assumption along the lines of asking why IAEA suddenly cited them.
You should seek to broaden your news sources if you’re truly unaware of what Hezbollah and the Houti’s have been up to for 20 months.

One of my links was from 23, one from 24. The international consensus that Iran is the world’s foremost sponsor of terror has been formed over decades and is not an assumption linked solely to the current conflict. It’s based on years if not decades of evidence.
 
Last edited:
They kinda go hand-in-hand. Even "anti-Trumper" is a dismissive generalization. As if the only reason a person dislikes something is because our President did it.

Same thing with the Hitler allegation: "[Y]ou're looking at it as how can we make Trump look like Hitler." Nobody does that. You have it backward. Some people truly think his actions look like Hitler, and then they say so. There is no premeditated conspiracy to spin something to make him look like Hitler. Hyperbole? Absolutely. But genuine.
My comments are directly related to my knowledge of Bleed's posting history.
 
General Wesley Clark spoke about the plan to invade 7 countries. It just took longer, but it's happened and happening. All for the interests of Israel

Please take a look. This operation is clearly in the United States’ own security interests.


 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT