The Left likes to justify the Islamic takeover of 22 countries in the Middle East through the “right of conquest” principle, but oddly doesn’t apply it when “white countries” take over foreign lands.
Do you even history, bruh?
Well, you have an elected democrat saying all she wants for her birthday is for someone to take out elon musk. You have the fruit cake VP failed candidate talking about his unhealthy hatred of Musk and bragging about tesla stocks being down. Then you have other elected democrats harping about the constitutional crisis Musk presents. You guys are the ones always talking about dog whistles, what do you think?
About white genocide in South Africa?!?!?1? Where did you see that? The mainstream media didn't tell me!
What?! I've never heard of any modern day approval of violent takeover from either side of the political aisle.
How is dumping tea overboard in protest of unfair taxes different from vandalizing Tesla dealerships in protest of an unelected billionaire's government influence?
Oh, hey! Look what I found!
Mental illness: still a punchline in 2025. I'll let Kyle Singler know how you feel.
You completely forgot what you typed that I was responding to, didn't you?
You’ve never heard? When Rashida Tlaib cheers the events of Oct 7th and chants from the river to the sea, this is all about a violent takeover.
If you do talk to Singler, tell him I hope he’s doing better. Nice try though.
Vandalism and setting cars on fire are hardly the same. One you can scrub off with soap and water. The other is a felony demanding prison time
Exactly. There needs to be outrage over this. If a well known, wealthy person associated with the left owned a dealership or business, and someone did damage to it, they should get called out, and prosecuted. Not @Dattier. Oh no, he has to find a way to twist it, making one of the most retarded replies ever.
They prob thought after 2020 when they hid their candidate for a year, flooded the country with mail in ballots, and then pulled off Jan 6, they could get away with anything and that the Dems would never lose another Pres election.
Kamala described it as justified anger and failed to condemn the billions in property damage.
worldisraelnews.com
All of those examples are distortions where you're connecting dots tangentially. Stop kitchen-sinking this. Have you not figured out yet that I'm not impressed with breakneck speed examples you throw out there in alarmist, extremist language? You aren't interested in any conversation. You just want to silence me.
Okay, substitute in the word "destroy" if it makes you feel better. The analogy stands.
I don’t want you silenced. Au contraire, I want you to learn more about who and what you support. Like Khalil, for example. He lied on his green card application, omitting his support fur Hamas and his former employment at UNRWA. That alone is grounds for deportation. He also is alleged to have had direct contact with Hamas, another violation of his conditional residence in this country.
Dr. King himself might have said, "[A] riot is the voice of the unheard" about Minnesota and every other riot right-winger wag their jowls over. Is that an endorsement of riots?
He only called in the Guard after the 3rd Precinct was already destroyed and he had become a national embarrassment. Doesn’t seem all that complex
I just addressed all 3 of your examples in your bc Minnesota post. All 3 of them are examples of extremist, alarmist language.
From the River to the Sea is extremist and alarmist. How does repeating her raison d’etre verbatim make me the one guilty of such language? The Left wants Israel disarmed and helpless so a second Holocaust can occur.
They’ve revealed their true colors. They don’t give a rats ass about climate change. If they did, would they be destroying EV’s? It’s all politics. Their hatred of Trump is visceral and by extension Musk
Minnesota
You’re so MLing dumb. Destroying private property vs an attempt to overthrow a free & fair election?
“Rep Tlaib never said it either”.Minnesota
I said your Minnesota examples.
Yeah, the Left wants that.
Even that has different interpretations. You don’t care, though, because it’s easier to take an extremist stance and condemn, condemn, condemn. Rep Tlaib never said it, either.
To be fair. Water makes other things wet. It, itself isn't wet.
That’s a difference we’ve noted on this board before. My dad loves Fox News but knows the nighttime hosts are in the tank for Trump and are partisan hacks. I’ll watch if the guests are strong. He likes the more news oriented daytime shows. Liberals still think Cnn and the major networks are unbiased and credible. They’ve been Dem Party operatives for decades and it got worse when their Savior came down in 08.
This. But I don’t even think he believes half the stuff he types. It’s just that he is in so deep, he has to argue in bad faith to stick to the script. It’s not a Dat thing though, it’s the ideology of the left. I’ve seen the media convince these people over the last 10 years that men can be women and vice versa. I’m 100% sure they don’t actually believe this, but again, they have to stick to whatever the current msm script is.
