ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

I love what's happening to Columbia University, $400 million in funding being taken away from them. Start acting right or else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
I love what's happening to Columbia University, $400 million in funding being taken away from them. Start acting right or else.
But Datt said no illegal protests were occurring, so Trump is clearly overreaching.
Columbia U and Barnard College are likely the epicenters of the anti-Israel movement b/c of a radicalized faculty and NYC’s large Jewish population.
Genocidal chants just aren’t as much fun if there aren’t any real live Jews around to intimidate. Ditto UCLA and Tulane, 20% Jewish pop.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192
He asked for evidence the other day of illegal protests. It was provided, and, as is his MO, he didn’t comment. Anything that makes the Left look bad, he can’t deal I’m afraid.
He does this quite often. To avoid this, he will lurk the thread to dissect a sentence someone says.

It's actually a clever tactic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
But Datt said no illegal protests were occurring, so Trump is clearly overreaching.
Columbia U and Barnard College are likely the epicenters of the anti-Israel movement b/c of a radicalized faculty and NYC’s large Jewish population.
Genocidal chants just aren’t as much fun if there aren’t any real live Jews around to intimidate. Ditto UCLA and Tulane, 20% Jewish pop.
I said what now?
Legal protests don't have to be tasteful.
I've asked several times what illegal protests were happening. No answers.
 
I love what's happening to Columbia University, $400 million in funding being taken away from them. Start acting right or else.
Of course you would.
It won't stick, but you can keep that warm, fuzzy feeling until the next news cycle gives you a new chubby.
 

Okay, no firewall here. Were there arrests for trespassing? Because it seems UCLA didn't allow these groups to continue protesting, but they weren't arrested for the content of their protests.
 
It is not illegal to protest against something Israel is doing.
It is not antisemitic to protest against something Israel is doing.
You may disagree with their opinions. They still aren't illegal nor antisemitic.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Mac9192
Shows what he watches doesn't it.
You haven't been right on this yet.

He does this quite often. To avoid this, he will lurk the thread to dissect a sentence someone says.

It's actually a clever tactic.
You couldn't name a single one. You still can't articulate what the legal justification for it is. All you care about is p3ning libs, and you're furious that they're not kissing the ring.
 
Maybe you should read what a spokesperson from Columbia said in regards to this. Especially before you get all butthurt and defensive.

If you don’t want to be treated like a hack, I’d suggest you not act like one
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
I said what now?
Legal protests don't have to be tasteful.
I've asked several times what illegal protests were happening. No answers.
Barricading Jewish students in the library is beyond bad taste. Columbia
I posted a YouTube clip of Jewish students denied entry to their classes, library, etc at UCLA. Google it. Civil rights violation.
This has happened several other places as well. As Mac said, you might want to expand your news gallery if this is truly the first time you’ve heard about this.
This week at Barnard College, they’ve occupied the library and refuse to leave.
Last I checked, libraries were for studying and checking out books.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192
It is not illegal to protest against something Israel is doing.
It is not antisemitic to protest against something Israel is doing.
You may disagree with their opinions. They still aren't illegal nor antisemitic.
Go Back to Poland and From the River to the Sea are far beyond “criticizing what Israel is doing”. When Israel’s war is the only one they care about, that could be easily seen as antisemitic regardless of how incendiary their rhetoric is or isn’t.
Signs like “Hitler was right” are not criticism of Israel’s policies.
 
Go Back to Poland and From the River to the Sea are far beyond “criticizing what Israel is doing”. When Israel’s war is the only one they care about, that could be easily seen as antisemitic regardless of how incendiary their rhetoric is or isn’t.
Signs like “Hitler was right” are not criticism of Israel’s policies.
These same lunatics were out in the streets en masse on Oct 8, before Israel even responded. They weren’t protesting; they were celebrating.
 
Of course you would.
It won't stick, but you can keep that warm, fuzzy feeling until the next news cycle gives you a new chubby.
I guess you also have an explanation as to why several Ivy League Presidents resigned last year because the protests were so legal and above board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192
You haven't been right on this yet.


You couldn't name a single one. You still can't articulate what the legal justification for it is. All you care about is p3ning libs, and you're furious that they're not kissing the ring.
We’ve named several. You’ve just chosen to ignore them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192
How far we have come from Charlottesville being a clear sign of widespread antisemitism, to protests directly aimed at Jewish students not being antisemitism. The Jews went from oppressed to the oppressors in the blink of an eye with the left. A few dozen hillbillies chanting the Jews will not replace us was so shocking it forced the potato to run for President. But actual jews being assaulted, harassed and forced to lock themselves into buildings until the angry jew hating mob was gone, just protests.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE and Mac9192
Maybe you should read what a spokesperson from Columbia said in regards to this. Especially before you get all butthurt and defensive.

If you don’t want to be treated like a hack, I’d suggest you not act like one
A spokesperson? Just any ol’ spokesperson? Who?

This is not me nitpicking a sentence; this is you being a vague hack with a Napoleon Complex.
 
Last edited:
How far we have come from Charlottesville being a clear sign of widespread antisemitism, to protests directly aimed at Jewish students not being antisemitism. The Jews went from oppressed to the oppressors in the blink of an eye with the left. A few dozen hillbillies chanting the Jews will not replace us was so shocking it forced the potato to run for President. But actual jews being assaulted, harassed and forced to lock themselves into buildings until the angry jew hating mob was gone, just protests.
“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
 
“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
So why did the protesters deliberately focus their anger at Jewish students? Why, immediately after October, 7th, before any retaliation from Israel were swastikas being painted over pictures of Israelis being held hostage by hamas? You loons were calling people who criticized George Soros, antisemitic. Now, just like every other accusation you guys project onto the right, you have no ground to stand on when it comes to what is or isn't antisemitism. You'll just change the definition to fit whatever narrative you need it to at any particular moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
As explained countless times before, these protests are bastions of Jew hatred that address no Israeli policies and primarily exist to chant antisemitic slurs.
Swastikas, Go Back to Poland, and From the River to the Sea address their fantasies of a Jew free world and have little to do with the current conflict.
Why were they chanting for a Ceasefire before Israel even began its offensive against Hamas?
Does Israel not have a right to defend itself when war is thrust upon it?
 
“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
Sad. Just sad
 
“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
We’ve given you example after example of Jewish students harassed and bullied yet you still continue to argue that the protests are mere criticism of “Israeli policies”.
You ask for evidence, it’s provided, and yet you continue to double down Bizarre
Of course, there are a lot of Jews on the Left who are scared of standing up for Israel. The Left doesn’t tolerate dissent
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192
So why did the protesters deliberately focus their anger at Jewish students? Why, immediately after October, 7th, before any retaliation from Israel were swastikas being painted over pictures of Israelis being held hostage by hamas? You loons were calling people who criticized George Soros, antisemitic. Now, just like every other accusation you guys project onto the right, you have no ground to stand on when it comes to what is or isn't antisemitism. You'll just change the definition to fit whatever narrative you need it to at any particular moment.
This is the first I've heard of it. I condemn both of those examples of "protest," just like I condemn certain rhetoric the right has latched onto from BLM protests. I am skeptical of how representative those inexcusable acts/chants are of the entire group, particularly as manipulated by conservative media and re-bleated by conservatives like those on this board.

Criticism of George Soros that is antisemitic has been criticized as antisemitic. That does not mean he is above all criticism. (I should add, I am speaking for myself here. I do not doubt that respectful criticism of Soros has been labeled antisemitic by some.)

Uh, huh, so we're nothing but loons, every allegation from the left is invalid, and we have no ground to stand on at all. :rolleyes: Come on, @GhostOf301 . I expect this kind of weak, lazy absolutism from @Mac9192 and @KDSTONE . You are capable of better.

I hear your criticism about changing definitions and raise you complexities and context, just like with your crap comparison of the Charlottesville abhorrence and protests critical of Israel.
 
As explained countless times before, these protests are bastions of Jew hatred that address no Israeli policies and primarily exist to chant antisemitic slurs.
Swastikas, Go Back to Poland, and From the River to the Sea address their fantasies of a Jew free world and have little to do with the current conflict.
Why were they chanting for a Ceasefire before Israel even began its offensive against Hamas?
Does Israel not have a right to defend itself when war is thrust upon it?
"Countless times before"? Yeah, no.
Hyperlinks are your friend.

Sad. Just sad
You know, you can reply to a single quote once, or even reply to multiple posts in a single post. Just sayin'...

We’ve given you example after example of Jewish students harassed and bullied yet you still continue to argue that the protests are mere criticism of “Israeli policies”.
You ask for evidence, it’s provided, and yet you continue to double down Bizarre
Of course, there are a lot of Jews on the Left who are scared of standing up for Israel. The Left doesn’t tolerate dissent
I have not seen example after example. Receipts? I have no categorized these protests as any single, monolithic thing. I expanded on that in my latest reply to @GhostOf301 . It would be a waste to repeat it to you.

Ah, so Jews on the right are courageous and Jews on the left are scared. Tell me about the entire number of GOP votes against all of President Trump's cabinet nominees combined before you accuse the left of not tolerating dissent. GTMLO with that basic betty bullcrap.
 
This is the first I've heard of it. I condemn both of those examples of "protest," just like I condemn certain rhetoric the right has latched onto from BLM protests. I am skeptical of how representative those inexcusable acts/chants are of the entire group, particularly as manipulated by conservative media and re-bleated by conservatives like those on this board.

Criticism of George Soros that is antisemitic has been criticized as antisemitic. That does not mean he is above all criticism. (I should add, I am speaking for myself here. I do not doubt that respectful criticism of Soros has been labeled antisemitic by some.)

Uh, huh, so we're nothing but loons, every allegation from the left is invalid, and we have no ground to stand on at all. :rolleyes: Come on, @GhostOf301 . I expect this kind of weak, lazy absolutism from @Mac9192 and @KDSTONE . You are capable of better.

I hear your criticism about changing definitions and raise you complexities and context, just like with your crap comparison of the Charlottesville abhorrence and protests critical of Israel.
“Skeptical of how representative these chants are of the entire group”.
If I were at a right wing rally and a small but vocal minority starting chanting “Fk the N—“ I would leave immediately. It seems to be much more pervasive at these protests than the example I offered, however. If the rest of the people at these “protests” dont leave when they see and hear genocidal signs and chants, they’re either mentally challenged or complicit or both.
The Left continues to downplay at best, deny altogether at worst how antisemitic these “protests” are. You’re predictably falling right in line.
Speaking of rent free, you can’t seem to keep from the personal attacks on Mac and me. A tell tale sign someone’s losing an argument
 
Last edited:
This is the first I've heard of it. I condemn both of those examples of "protest," just like I condemn certain rhetoric the right has latched onto from BLM protests. I am skeptical of how representative those inexcusable acts/chants are of the entire group, particularly as manipulated by conservative media and re-bleated by conservatives like those on this board.

Criticism of George Soros that is antisemitic has been criticized as antisemitic. That does not mean he is above all criticism. (I should add, I am speaking for myself here. I do not doubt that respectful criticism of Soros has been labeled antisemitic by some.)

Uh, huh, so we're nothing but loons, every allegation from the left is invalid, and we have no ground to stand on at all. :rolleyes: Come on, @GhostOf301 . I expect this kind of weak, lazy absolutism from @Mac9192 and @KDSTONE . You are capable of better.

I hear your criticism about changing definitions and raise you complexities and context, just like with your crap comparison of the Charlottesville abhorrence and protests critical of Israel.
You don’t find it odd that none of these SJW give a rat’s ass about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the genocide in Sudan? How they’re laser focused on Israel’s prosecution of a war they didn’t even start?
 
They love to play the small percentage card when it suits them. But also love to exaggerate the shit out of white supremacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KDSTONE
The bloody handprints motif commemorates the slaughter of two Jews by Palestinian “civilians” in 2000. Pins of bloody handprints celebrating the “resistance” are worn by Jew haters like Mark Ruffalo, who knows damn well what it means.
 
You don’t find it odd that none of these SJW give a rat’s ass about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the genocide in Sudan? How they’re laser focused on Israel’s prosecution of a war they didn’t even start?
I’ve seen plenty of concern about both. 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
No, @Mac9192 couldn’t name a single one.
Not sure what you’re referring to. Only thing I’ve mentioned was the proposed cuts at Columbia University. Which I think you denied.

You must have been at Great Clips getting a little taken off the side, and missed it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT