But Datt said no illegal protests were occurring, so Trump is clearly overreaching.I love what's happening to Columbia University, $400 million in funding being taken away from them. Start acting right or else.
Shows what he watches doesn't it.But Datt said no illegal protests were occurring, so Trump is clearly overreaching.
He asked for evidence the other day of illegal protests. It was provided, and, as is his MO, he didn’t comment. Anything that makes the Left look bad, he can’t deal I’m afraid.Shows what he watches doesn't it.
He does this quite often. To avoid this, he will lurk the thread to dissect a sentence someone says.He asked for evidence the other day of illegal protests. It was provided, and, as is his MO, he didn’t comment. Anything that makes the Left look bad, he can’t deal I’m afraid.
I said what now?But Datt said no illegal protests were occurring, so Trump is clearly overreaching.
Columbia U and Barnard College are likely the epicenters of the anti-Israel movement b/c of a radicalized faculty and NYC’s large Jewish population.
Genocidal chants just aren’t as much fun if there aren’t any real live Jews around to intimidate. Ditto UCLA and Tulane, 20% Jewish pop.
Wait. Where?He asked for evidence the other day of illegal protests. It was provided, and, as is his MO, he didn’t comment. Anything that makes the Left look bad, he can’t deal I’m afraid.
Ah. Firewall. Care to share what's in it?
Of course you would.I love what's happening to Columbia University, $400 million in funding being taken away from them. Start acting right or else.
You haven't been right on this yet.Shows what he watches doesn't it.
You couldn't name a single one. You still can't articulate what the legal justification for it is. All you care about is p3ning libs, and you're furious that they're not kissing the ring.He does this quite often. To avoid this, he will lurk the thread to dissect a sentence someone says.
It's actually a clever tactic.
Barricading Jewish students in the library is beyond bad taste. ColumbiaI said what now?
Legal protests don't have to be tasteful.
I've asked several times what illegal protests were happening. No answers.
Go Back to Poland and From the River to the Sea are far beyond “criticizing what Israel is doing”. When Israel’s war is the only one they care about, that could be easily seen as antisemitic regardless of how incendiary their rhetoric is or isn’t.It is not illegal to protest against something Israel is doing.
It is not antisemitic to protest against something Israel is doing.
You may disagree with their opinions. They still aren't illegal nor antisemitic.
These same lunatics were out in the streets en masse on Oct 8, before Israel even responded. They weren’t protesting; they were celebrating.Go Back to Poland and From the River to the Sea are far beyond “criticizing what Israel is doing”. When Israel’s war is the only one they care about, that could be easily seen as antisemitic regardless of how incendiary their rhetoric is or isn’t.
Signs like “Hitler was right” are not criticism of Israel’s policies.
I guess you also have an explanation as to why several Ivy League Presidents resigned last year because the protests were so legal and above board.Of course you would.
It won't stick, but you can keep that warm, fuzzy feeling until the next news cycle gives you a new chubby.
We’ve named several. You’ve just chosen to ignore them.You haven't been right on this yet.
You couldn't name a single one. You still can't articulate what the legal justification for it is. All you care about is p3ning libs, and you're furious that they're not kissing the ring.
We’ve named several. You’ve just chosen to ignore them.
A spokesperson? Just any ol’ spokesperson? Who?Maybe you should read what a spokesperson from Columbia said in regards to this. Especially before you get all butthurt and defensive.
If you don’t want to be treated like a hack, I’d suggest you not act like one
“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄How far we have come from Charlottesville being a clear sign of widespread antisemitism, to protests directly aimed at Jewish students not being antisemitism. The Jews went from oppressed to the oppressors in the blink of an eye with the left. A few dozen hillbillies chanting the Jews will not replace us was so shocking it forced the potato to run for President. But actual jews being assaulted, harassed and forced to lock themselves into buildings until the angry jew hating mob was gone, just protests.
So why did the protesters deliberately focus their anger at Jewish students? Why, immediately after October, 7th, before any retaliation from Israel were swastikas being painted over pictures of Israelis being held hostage by hamas? You loons were calling people who criticized George Soros, antisemitic. Now, just like every other accusation you guys project onto the right, you have no ground to stand on when it comes to what is or isn't antisemitism. You'll just change the definition to fit whatever narrative you need it to at any particular moment.“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
As explained countless times before, these protests are bastions of Jew hatred that address no Israeli policies and primarily exist to chant antisemitic slurs.“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
Sad. Just sad“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
We’ve given you example after example of Jewish students harassed and bullied yet you still continue to argue that the protests are mere criticism of “Israeli policies”.“Jews will not replace us” vs Israel-should-touch-some-grass 🙄
Jews are a people. Israel is a country. Criticism of one is not inherent criticism of the other. The local ACLU-ish lawyer defending Columbia is a Lieberman. There are very, very prominent Jewish people who are highly critical of Israeli policy and action.
At the rate y’all are going, intramural wrestling at a private Jewish school will soon be labeled antisemitic because a Jew will be losing regardless.
This is the first I've heard of it. I condemn both of those examples of "protest," just like I condemn certain rhetoric the right has latched onto from BLM protests. I am skeptical of how representative those inexcusable acts/chants are of the entire group, particularly as manipulated by conservative media and re-bleated by conservatives like those on this board.So why did the protesters deliberately focus their anger at Jewish students? Why, immediately after October, 7th, before any retaliation from Israel were swastikas being painted over pictures of Israelis being held hostage by hamas? You loons were calling people who criticized George Soros, antisemitic. Now, just like every other accusation you guys project onto the right, you have no ground to stand on when it comes to what is or isn't antisemitism. You'll just change the definition to fit whatever narrative you need it to at any particular moment.
"Countless times before"? Yeah, no.As explained countless times before, these protests are bastions of Jew hatred that address no Israeli policies and primarily exist to chant antisemitic slurs.
Swastikas, Go Back to Poland, and From the River to the Sea address their fantasies of a Jew free world and have little to do with the current conflict.
Why were they chanting for a Ceasefire before Israel even began its offensive against Hamas?
Does Israel not have a right to defend itself when war is thrust upon it?
You know, you can reply to a single quote once, or even reply to multiple posts in a single post. Just sayin'...Sad. Just sad
I have not seen example after example. Receipts? I have no categorized these protests as any single, monolithic thing. I expanded on that in my latest reply to @GhostOf301 . It would be a waste to repeat it to you.We’ve given you example after example of Jewish students harassed and bullied yet you still continue to argue that the protests are mere criticism of “Israeli policies”.
You ask for evidence, it’s provided, and yet you continue to double down Bizarre
Of course, there are a lot of Jews on the Left who are scared of standing up for Israel. The Left doesn’t tolerate dissent
“Skeptical of how representative these chants are of the entire group”.This is the first I've heard of it. I condemn both of those examples of "protest," just like I condemn certain rhetoric the right has latched onto from BLM protests. I am skeptical of how representative those inexcusable acts/chants are of the entire group, particularly as manipulated by conservative media and re-bleated by conservatives like those on this board.
Criticism of George Soros that is antisemitic has been criticized as antisemitic. That does not mean he is above all criticism. (I should add, I am speaking for myself here. I do not doubt that respectful criticism of Soros has been labeled antisemitic by some.)
Uh, huh, so we're nothing but loons, every allegation from the left is invalid, and we have no ground to stand on at all.Come on, @GhostOf301 . I expect this kind of weak, lazy absolutism from @Mac9192 and @KDSTONE . You are capable of better.
I hear your criticism about changing definitions and raise you complexities and context, just like with your crap comparison of the Charlottesville abhorrence and protests critical of Israel.
You don’t find it odd that none of these SJW give a rat’s ass about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the genocide in Sudan? How they’re laser focused on Israel’s prosecution of a war they didn’t even start?This is the first I've heard of it. I condemn both of those examples of "protest," just like I condemn certain rhetoric the right has latched onto from BLM protests. I am skeptical of how representative those inexcusable acts/chants are of the entire group, particularly as manipulated by conservative media and re-bleated by conservatives like those on this board.
Criticism of George Soros that is antisemitic has been criticized as antisemitic. That does not mean he is above all criticism. (I should add, I am speaking for myself here. I do not doubt that respectful criticism of Soros has been labeled antisemitic by some.)
Uh, huh, so we're nothing but loons, every allegation from the left is invalid, and we have no ground to stand on at all.Come on, @GhostOf301 . I expect this kind of weak, lazy absolutism from @Mac9192 and @KDSTONE . You are capable of better.
I hear your criticism about changing definitions and raise you complexities and context, just like with your crap comparison of the Charlottesville abhorrence and protests critical of Israel.
The bloody handprints motif commemorates the slaughter of two Jews by Palestinian “civilians” in 2000. Pins of bloody handprints celebrating the “resistance” are worn by Jew haters like Mark Ruffalo, who knows damn well what it means.![]()
UCLA suspends Students for Justice in Palestine after vandalism at UC regent's home
UCLA suspended two pro-Palestinian campus groups after a protest at a UC regent's home, which was vandalized. Chancellor Julio Frenk said students violated conduct rules. The groups said they were undeterred.www.latimes.com
I’ve seen plenty of concern about both. 🤷🏻♂️You don’t find it odd that none of these SJW give a rat’s ass about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine or the genocide in Sudan? How they’re laser focused on Israel’s prosecution of a war they didn’t even start?
Not sure what you’re referring to. Only thing I’ve mentioned was the proposed cuts at Columbia University. Which I think you denied.No, @Mac9192 couldn’t name a single one.