When the moderators fact check only one of the candidates, you know the deck is stacked. Not their role to fact check. Hopefully, the Reps will be smart enough to never allow Abc anywhere near another Pres debate, but I doubt it.
I don't think it's a bad thing to correct a candidate or provide context for what they say if it is a blatant misrepresentation of the truth. The problem is they only did it on one side. They also led Kamala's talking points multiple times. 3 on 1 and Trump only moderately made a fool out of himself. He's grown up so much.
No. He wants to grieve privately and he cannot do that now that his son’s death has been coopted by the Know-Nothing MAGAS. What is disgusting is the use Trump and his nimrods are making of it.
He took the bait she set too many times. It was a poor performance She had very little in the way of policy, no surprise there, but was more poised and confident than I’d have thought possible. Of course, when you know the mods will set the table to your liking, that’s bound to help you relax We joke about Springfield here. Maybe it happened maybe it didn’t with the pets thing. But it was cringy when Trump mentioned it last night Thought he was smarter than that
I'll try again... A grieving father doesn't want Republicans using his son's death to take shots at undocumented immigrants.
He puts himself in front of a camera and says that he wishes his son was murdered by a 60 year old white man instead of an illegal immigrant because he knows it is a bad look for the political party he supports. That is NOT someone who wants to grieve in private. That is someone who wants to use his son's death to take shots at the party he hates. Your argument would hold water if he simply asked that his son not be used to bring attention to the republicans agenda. But he didn't.
No. A grieving father does not use his son’s death to take shots at republicans. A grieving father wishes his son was not murdered. He doesn't wish his son was murdered by a 60 year old white man instead. I have empathy for him. I have empathy for everyone who loses someone close to them, even Michael Brown's mother. What I don't have for him is respect. I think he is a disgusting liberal who is so ate up in politics that he would wish his son was murdered by the evil white man instead of the helpless asylum seeker instead of just wishing his son wasn't murdered at all. He chose to put himself in front of a camera and say those things. For you to defend him is wild as hell.
If not for the current admin’s open border policies his son would still be alive so there’s that…
You know nothing about what I will or won’t to so cut the crap. You want to hate liberals so badly that you cannot even gave empathy for a grieving parent. Absolutely disgusting.
Can you calm down, gather your thoughts and retype this message so that I can make some sense out of it?
Other than the typo of to which should be do, the post is fine. You were telling me you know how I would try to bend statistics about immigrant crime to fit my view point and I told you that you are in no position to assume anything about how I treat crime stats. Clear enough?
ABC did a fact-check afterward:
For the third time: The grieving father is not politicizing his son's death. He is calling out Republicans who politicized his son's death.
Yes:
So again, what were they supposed to fact-check w/ VP Harris, who was much more accurate and truthful?
For the third time you are ignoring what was totally wrong and disgusting with what he said because he is ate up in partisan politics. We can move on. You're okay with his disgraceful attitude, you've said enough.
There's no use, you've already shut down any opposition to your opinions. She lied all night. I could give you one lie, and you will tell me she was telling the truth.
Republicans politicized his son's death. His comment was in response to that, criticizing them. His "wish" was not for the purpose of furthering his own political agenda; it was to silence the Republicans misusing his son's death for their political agenda. You have to be really stupid and lacking some basic human decency not to understand that.
You idiot. He could have said that he wished his son wasn't killed at all and said the same thing about how that way the republicans couldn't use his son’s name. But no, he went woke with his own son’s death with the 60 year old white man shit. You people are the sick ones. You can't even see it.
If I've shut you down, it's because you believe absolute nonsense that is easily debunked. I'm almost always thorough.
Oh, so now you want to police the way a grieving father responded after Republicans politicized the death of his son. You're absolute trash. Go back to obsessing about trans kids' genitals, scumbag.
The Charlottesville hoax has been repeatedly debunked. The Left is becoming more cult like every day: rife with half truths, outright lies, and of course the Evil Orange boogeyman. Every cult has to have one. The blood bath lie is another go to that has been completely taken out of context. Trump incited a riot on Jan 6 has no credible evidence to support this allegation
So, just so we're clear. It is your allegation that Harris did not tell a single lie last night?
For such a great night, exceeding all expectations, these two sure seem angry today Why is that? Oh yeh I forgot they’re liberals, they’re always angry
So you don’t think trans kids ever regret the nuts getting chopped off part of it all?
National ban on abortion. 2025, she was asked about fracking and mandatory buy backs, but didn't even get pressured to give answers on them. She lied about why millions of people lost their jobs at the end of Trump’s term. She lied about Trump giving us covid. She was totally dishonest about his response to the Central Park 5. She said all kinds of shit that the moderators could have checked her on. They both did. But like we said, it was one way, nit both.
Absolutely not. I referenced two in the last paragraph of my post about fact-checking.
national ban on abortion: President Trump has consistently said he wouldn't sign it. I don't believe him, and VP Harris apparently doesn't believe him. If she was making a prediction, fine. If she was saying he would based on his own word, she was wrong. Since you credit her with being so smart and knowledgeable that she couldn't have possibly made an honest mistake, it's a lie.
She was not spot on with the Central Park 5. That was a brutal rape and assault where those kids made detailed confessions. They were wrongful arrested and tried. But Trump’s comments were in respect to having suspects confess. She left that part out.
Being a hypocrite is the least of his problems. He's a lying, delusional, party hack. And those are his good qualities.
