He develops freshman more than anyone imo. He gets them playing as a team quickly.Does he really "develop" players or does he merely take kids that might have gone to the NBA right out of HS and babysit them for a year?
He develops freshman more than anyone imo. He gets them playing as a team quickly.Does he really "develop" players or does he merely take kids that might have gone to the NBA right out of HS and babysit them for a year?
Can you link what you used to measure that?And our coach has more guts????
Well, that proves it. Case closed.He develops freshman more than anyone imo...
uh well that proves guts? missed that stat I guess.Sure....no problem
http://pkinvitational.com/teams/
I'm not trying to sell you on anything.You are on a Duke board trying to sell us on the SEC and CAL?
You told one of OUR posters that he obviously doesn't know what he is talking about.
what are you REALLY expecting to come here and accomplish?
We typically treat opposing fans better then your fanbase does at RR, but it is not clear at all to me what your purpose is here. I am betting your welcome is close to being worn out.
The topic of this thread is Kentucky’s schedule TO DATE. Compare Duke’s schedule so far to UK’s. There’s no contest.Here's some fun for you. Duke SOS 10 and UK 12.
https://www.teamrankings.com/ncaa-basketball/rpi-ranking/sos-rpi-rating-by-team
I was actually surprised when I saw the SOS being about the same. I didn't expect it.
I read every post and I never said Cal has guts. I will say I can't imagine any coach in the country afraid of playing games. It's what they do for a living. You run the teams the best you can. I trust him to do his job well.Yeah, and you showed up providing your opinion as fact and then requiring evidence to counter it. When we say we don't agree with you opinion, it's then an attack, not a difference of opinion in your eyes.
So here's the counter to your opinion. You say Cal has guts, but he deliberately didn't enter a tough tournament..because it may have been tough. Then you say he's terrific at developing talent over one year with no metric to base that on. Finally, you say he's great at getting young teams to work together, again, without any type of metric.
I get you're sticking up for your guy, but demanding clear metrics while providing none is not a convincing way of doing so. Also, the proof that K is better? 5 NCs to 1 + a questionable reputation. So please continue to argue your point, just don't expect Duke fans to agree simply because you think your opinions are accurate. Us disagreeing is not attacking, it's providing an alternate opinion.