I had kind of settled into the idea that Seth and Miles were as much to blame as Austin for the '12 shortcomings (particularly attitude, jealousy, chemistry stuff), but then Seth had a really admirable senior year and I figured, "Meh, bygones."I also meant to comment on Austin. Had he stayed his sophomore year, I believe he could have helped Duke to a Final Four. He just wasn't ready to lead a team as a freshman. He never seemed to be a leader type, which he didn't have to be. He's just one of those guys who will be remembered two ways, as the UNC killer and as a team killer. The latter may not be fair, but there are arguments to support it.
He took the team on his back on multiple instances during wins and losses. So I ask, was it his inability to lead, or his teammates' inability to follow? Or a combination of both?
I had kind of settled into the idea that Seth and Miles were as much to blame as Austin for the '12 shortcomings (particularly attitude, jealousy, chemistry stuff), but then Seth had a really admirable senior year and I figured, "Meh, bygones."
No doubt. Look at Kyle and Quinn, for example. Kyle was FF MOP and a champion as a junior and a highly decorated player throughout his Duke career... but his senior year wasn't as great as we'd hoped, and we were upset in the Sweet 16. Quinn, on the other hand, was somewhat frustrating for 3 years (that's understating it for me), and was at risk of being the first 4-year player since '83 or so who hadn't won any type of championship, but a great senior year and a national championship meant he went out on a high note. By pretty much every measurable, Kyle was the better player, yet the lasting impression of two championship players skews much more toward Quinn imo based on something so specific as when each won it all....some guys are slighted simply because their teams did not deliver in a team oriented sport.
No doubt. Look at Kyle and Quinn, for example. Kyle was FF MOP and a champion as a junior and a highly decorated player throughout his Duke career... but his senior year wasn't as great as we'd hoped, and we were upset in the Sweet 16. Quinn, on the other hand, was somewhat frustrating for 3 years (that's understating it for me), and was at risk of being the first 4-year player since '83 or so who hadn't won any type of championship, but a great senior year and a national championship meant he went out on a high note. By pretty much every measurable, Kyle was the better player, yet the lasting impression of two championship players skews much more toward Quinn imo based on something so specific as when each won it all.
Dat Verga was a SG who took the same shots as JJ but did not have to some off screens to get his shot and this is not a knock on JJ. Mullins was a small forward at Duke.Denton had the misfortune of being a great player whose career coincided with the start of the worst period in the history of Duke BB.I still can't believe we passed on Chuck Daly and H ibie Brown for Bucky Walters. BTW Dat unless u need a massuese and chiropacter after a round of golf u are still a youngster to me lol
Its nice for me to see Bob Verga and Randy Denton but they are old school but two of the best.
Yeah, but maybe we go down in history as the racist all-White team who played all-Black Texas Western, so historically speaking, we might owe Verga's wimpy immune system a debt of gratitude.... I will go to my grave believing that we win the NC in 66 if VERGA does not get sick
HOKIE jmo Verga was a better shooter than JJ.without looking it up I think he shot around 49% for his Duke career while taking the same type of shots.I beg to differ with you re Bubas vs K. Bubas had a better won loss percentage than K.He operated in a period where only one ACC team even had a chance to go to the tourney. He still went to the FF four times in eight years, and I will go to my grave believing that we win the NC in 66 if VERGA does not get sick
Dat I don't think that would have happened because we did not have Rupp as a coach and think we were actively recruiting black players. We had been playing teams with black players on them for a while.Too lazy to look it up but we signed the conferences second black player right around around this periodYeah, but maybe we go down in history as the racist all-White team who played all-Black Texas Western, so historically speaking, we might owe Verga's wimpy immune system a debt of gratitude.
Dat I don't think that would have happened because we did not have Rupp as a coach and think we were actively recruiting black players. We had been playing teams with black players on them for a while.Too lazy to look it up but we signed the conferences second black player right around around this period
The mid sixties was the period I was referring to.MD did have the first black player and we had the second. Ironically a black player from NC cost us another National Championship in either 63 or 64.Kenny Washington from Wilmington I think went to UCLA went crazy against us in the FF. He had the best game of his career against us. We had recruited him but could not get him into schoolI think CB Claiborne in the mid 60's. '65 I think. Maryland had the first I thought.