I didn't see a thread for this. Thought people might want to have a place to talk about the draft.
Mark Williams impressed with his size and reach. 9'9" standing reach. That's crazy. Not a lot of good examples of recent NBA stars that fit the 7' guy who can't shoot from deep of late, but Deandre Ayton might be a realistic comp for Mark. I think Mark might even be a bit more agile than Ayton.
Wendell didn't participate in 5 on 5s. I don't like that, but I do think it makes more sense for a junior to forego that than a freshman. NBA teams have PLENTY of tape on Wendell so maybe he felt like the 5 on 5s weren't necessary.
I've seen some mock drafts have AJ as high as the #4 pick. I do not get that, but I'm happy for him. I am just not buying that his three point shooting was anything other than a bit of a fluke. His mechanics do not look good to me. And he didn't really show a whole lot as far as creating off the dribble. Still, teams love his frame and his youth and I can't blame them for that. Good for AJ.
The big question of course is Keels (and that's being discussed in another thread on this board). While I think Wendell should 100% stay in the draft, I think it's a much tougher call for Keels. Keels has the ability to noticeably improve his stock with another year in college, and playing for Duke next year should get him paid via the NIL route. Better that than floundering in the G League next year, I'd think. And if he can lose some weight, add a little quickness, and demonstrate that he is indeed the outside shooter he was thought to be as a high school kid, you could easily see him going in the high teens or low twenties after next season.
Mark Williams impressed with his size and reach. 9'9" standing reach. That's crazy. Not a lot of good examples of recent NBA stars that fit the 7' guy who can't shoot from deep of late, but Deandre Ayton might be a realistic comp for Mark. I think Mark might even be a bit more agile than Ayton.
Wendell didn't participate in 5 on 5s. I don't like that, but I do think it makes more sense for a junior to forego that than a freshman. NBA teams have PLENTY of tape on Wendell so maybe he felt like the 5 on 5s weren't necessary.
I've seen some mock drafts have AJ as high as the #4 pick. I do not get that, but I'm happy for him. I am just not buying that his three point shooting was anything other than a bit of a fluke. His mechanics do not look good to me. And he didn't really show a whole lot as far as creating off the dribble. Still, teams love his frame and his youth and I can't blame them for that. Good for AJ.
The big question of course is Keels (and that's being discussed in another thread on this board). While I think Wendell should 100% stay in the draft, I think it's a much tougher call for Keels. Keels has the ability to noticeably improve his stock with another year in college, and playing for Duke next year should get him paid via the NIL route. Better that than floundering in the G League next year, I'd think. And if he can lose some weight, add a little quickness, and demonstrate that he is indeed the outside shooter he was thought to be as a high school kid, you could easily see him going in the high teens or low twenties after next season.