ADVERTISEMENT

Off-season thoughts

I read Sarr needs to work on his shot selection and turnovers. We were spoiled with Kon, Sion, Proctor and Cooper, who didn't really turn the ball over. Except for the last few minutes of the Houston game where the ball seemed to be covered in butter for us lol. I'd prefer Coward over Sarr just because he probably can help us more next year and is more of a finished product. That said Sarr is very talented and would likely start for us. The other board is debating Coward. He is testing great, but the flip side he has put up good numbers against sub par comp and didn't play the best against good teams. It depends on how much stock the NBA puts into testing and measurements. If I had to guess he would go in the late 20's but it is a weak draft so someone may take a chance on him earlier. If Coward wanted to come to Duke and improve his stock the option is there; but you could argue his stock may never be higher than it is now; especially if he is underwhelming at Duke. Sion and Proctor both seem to be in the mid second round which can be no man's land. I watched a video of Proctor working out; he looks so skinny next to the other guys. He is tall though; he measured at 6-4 and a half. Proctor did okay in the shooting drills but did not distinguish himself. Sion measured at 6-4 without shoes.
  • Like
Reactions: The_Only_Blue

Off-season thoughts

It ain’t our money being spent so honestly what’s it matter. I don’t like it but I sure as heck ain’t going to stop watching (for now) because of it

Agreed pisgah. For me, I’m just too passionate of a Duke basketball and men’s college basketball fan to ever see myself stop watching it.

The players should be making money. For decades the schools and the ncaa were making money off the players when all along it was the players putting butts in seats and getting eye balls on the television sets.

I cannot fault the players for wanting to better their situations and transferring to schools who improve their financial and/or game action situations.

I liken it to my situation. If I was ever in a position where I could earn more money by accepting a promotion and thus improving both my financial and quality of life, then I am taking that promotion 100 times out of 100 times.

The New Lounge

You’re laying out a solid case for skepticism about the market’s health, and it’s worth unpacking the points you’ve raised with a clear-eyed look at what’s happening. I’ll address each concern, ground it in available data, and assess how these factors might weigh on the broader economic and market outlook, keeping things concise but thorough.1. Student Loan Repayments ResumingThe shift from zero-dollar payments to active student loan repayments is a real drag on consumer spending. As of late 2023, when the federal student loan forbearance ended, about 43 million borrowers with roughly $1.6 trillion in federal student debt faced payments restarting. Average monthly payments range from $200–$400, per the Federal Reserve, hitting younger households (Gen Z and Millennials) hardest, who already allocate 50–60% of income to essentials like rent and groceries. Wage garnishment for defaulters—potentially 15–25% of disposable income—further crimps budgets.This reduces discretionary spending, which accounts for ~30% of U.S. GDP. Retail sales data shows early signs of weakness: October 2024 retail spending growth slowed to 0.1% month-over-month, per the Commerce Department, and consumer sentiment dipped to 68.9 in November 2024 (University of Michigan), partly due to debt pressures. The risk here is a feedback loop where weaker spending hits corporate revenues, especially in consumer-facing sectors like retail and hospitality.2. Federal Job Cuts and Economic Ripple EffectsHundreds of thousands of federal job cuts, alongside reduced grants and contracts, are a headwind for local economies. While precise 2025 figures are murky, proposed budget tightening under the new administration suggests a leaner federal workforce. The Bureau of Labor Statistics noted 2.8 million federal employees in 2024; a 10% cut would mean ~280,000 jobs lost. Indirect losses—contractors, small businesses near federal hubs—could double that impact.Places like Washington, D.C., and military base towns are especially vulnerable, as federal spending supports 15–20% of local GDP in these areas. The multiplier effect means each lost job cuts broader economic activity by 1.5–2x. Early data shows government spending growth slowing to 1.2% annualized in Q3 2024 (BEA), and further cuts could tip regions into contraction, dragging on national GDP growth, projected at 2.1% for 2025 by the IMF.3. Tariff Pause and Retaliation RisksThe 90-day tariff hike pause is a tactical delay, not a resolution. Current tariffs—10% on most imports, 30% on Chinese goods—already add ~0.5% to U.S. consumer prices, per the National Bureau of Economic Research. Ifავ11.2% duties on aluminum, steel, and autos further inflate costs. If the pause ends without trade deals, reimposed or escalated tariffs could spike inflation, with estimates suggesting a 20% across-the-board tariff could raise consumer prices by 1–2%.Retaliation is a real threat: in 2018–19, China, Canada, and the EU hit back with $100 billion in counter-tariffs, hurting U.S. exporters (e.g., agriculture, whiskey). X posts from trade analysts (e.g., @TradeGuy) highlight growing concern about a 2025 trade war, especially if China devalues the yuan to offset tariffs. This would disrupt global supply chains and raise costs for U.S. firms, squeezing margins and potentially triggering layoffs.4. Proposed Tariffs on Semiconductors and PharmaceuticalsNew tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals would hit critical sectors. Semiconductors face 25% tariffs on Chinese imports, but expanding duties to other sources (e.g., Taiwan, South Korea) could raise chip prices by 10–15%, per industry estimates, impacting tech giants and consumers (think higher iPhone or laptop costs). Pharmaceuticals, already grappling with 7.5–25% tariffs on some Chinese APIs (active pharmaceutical ingredients), could see drug prices rise 5–10% if duties expand, straining healthcare budgets.These sectors are supply-chain choke points: 80% of global chip capacity is in Asia, and China supplies 60% of U.S. generic drug ingredients. Disruptions here ripple fast, and recent X chatter from healthcare execs flags delays in drug production as a growing risk.5. Ongoing Tariff ImpactsExisting tariffs (10% global, 30% China, plus steel/aluminum/auto duties) continue to inflate costs. The Peterson Institute estimates these tariffs have raised U.S. consumer and producer prices by $100 billion annually, with 70% of the burden on U.S. households. Supply chain strains persist—port delays and freight costs are up 20% year-over-year (Drewry Shipping Index)—and firms like Walmart have flagged price hikes in 2025. This feeds inflation, which, at 2.6% in October 2024 (CPI), remains above the Fed’s 2% target, limiting room for rate cuts.6. High Long-Term Bond YieldsLong-term bond yields are at multi-decade highs, with the 10-year Treasury at 4.8% in early 2025 (per FRED data), up from 3.5% a year ago. This raises borrowing costs: mortgage rates are near 7.5%, corporate bond yields for BBB-rated firms hit 6%, and auto loan rates top 8%. Higher yields also make equities less attractive—S&P 500 dividend yields are just 1.3%—pulling capital to bonds.The Fed’s pause on rate cuts (funds rate at 4.75–5%) reflects inflation fears, but high yields signal tighter financial conditions. The NFIB Small Business Optimism Index fell to 90.2 in October 2024, with 25% of firms citing financing costs as a top concern. This could curb investment and hiring, slowing growth.7. Elevated CAPE RatiosThe Shiller CAPE ratio, at ~36 in early 2025, is near dot 2000 bubble levels (~40), signaling valuations assume rosy growth and low risks. Yet, S&P 500 forward P/E is 22, and earnings growth is slowing—Q4 2024 S&P earnings rose just 4% year-over-year, per FactSet. With GDP growth softening (2.5% annualized Q3 2024) and risks mounting, this suggests markets are priced for perfection. X posts from investors like @LynAlden point to parallels with 2000 and 2007, where high valuations met unexpected shocks.Synthesis and OutlookYour concerns paint a picture of an economy and market facing mounting headwinds:Consumer Pressure: Student loans and job cuts erode spending, risking a 0.5–1% GDP growth hit in 2025.Trade Risks: Tariffs, paused or not, drive inflation and retaliation, potentially adding 1–2% to CPI and disrupting supply chains.Financial Conditions: High yields and tight Fed policy raise borrowing costs, curbing investment and equity appeal.Valuation Risks: Stretched CAPE ratios leave little margin for error if earnings or growth falter.The foundation isn’t collapsing, but it’s shaky. Q1 2025 data—retail sales, ISM manufacturing, and CPI—will be critical. If consumer spending cracks or tariffs escalate, markets could correct 10–15%, especially in overvalued tech (NASDAQ P/E ~30). Defensive sectors (utilities, staples) and bonds may outperform if volatility spikes.You’re right to question the “great shape” narrative. The risks are real, and while the market’s been resilient, it’s skating on thinner ice than many admit.
What, no line breaks.
Whatever. I guess that's pretty thorough.

Off-season thoughts

I'm not ready to root for the NBA, but I've already returned to following the team I grew up with....Princeton. Saw Bradley many times at Jadwyn Gym. He didn't get paid and didn't leave early. Ah, the good old days. Go Tigers.
OFC
I remember Bradley ALMOST came to Duke to play for Vic.

OFC
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT