Dattier said:

I said there's a wide range of development between the kid in your video and the oldest kids in the school.
I said it is between a kid and their parents what the kid reads.
I said it's no parent's right to decide what other people's kids get to read.

It's not grooming. Not at all.

I didn't weigh in on the book whatsoever.

Is it acceptable for this book to be in a public library? A bookstore? What's the difference between an 11-year-old activist seeking it out there?

Click to expand...

So middle schoolers can’t check out books without parental consent? Do you think parents have time to read all of their kids’ books? Parents have no idea what their kids are checking out

Dattier said:

I said there's a wide range of development between the kid in your video and the oldest kids in the school.
I said it is between a kid and their parents what the kid reads.
I said it's no parent's right to decide what other people's kids get to read.

It's not grooming. Not at all.

I didn't weigh in on the book whatsoever.

Is it acceptable for this book to be in a public library? A bookstore? What's the difference between an 11-year-old activist seeking it out there?

Click to expand...

One is funded by taxpayers. One is a private business

Dattier said:

I said no such thing.
It's not my call. Is it your call?

Click to expand...

It’s the taxpayers’ call in each particular district.

Y'all do realize President Biden's garbage comment was in response to the classless Puerto Rico joke at the Trump rally in MSG this weekend, don't you?

GhostOf301 said:

He said "why stop there?" Indicating that he is aware of the difference that you speak of. So where does it stop for you, datt. What crosses the line in your opinion?

Click to expand...

This isn't about me. My wife and I raised our kids with restrictions on what they were allowed to read when, based on conversations about readiness, not outright bans. Those parameters have nothing to do with controlling the school library or what any other parent does with their kid.

GhostOf301 said:

It is not appropriate or acceptable for it to be available for anyone under the age of 18 to be able to get it from a public library, let alone a school library. Book stores shouldn't be able to sell it to minors. A book meant for minors about minors participating in sexual acts between two boys is 100% grooming. Sick fvcks.

Click to expand...

Who decides that? Should Oedipus Rex be banned from school? Dude kills his dad and marries his mother. How about The Kite Runner? There's a child rapist. Judy Blum? Masturbation. The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian? Masturbation, sexual fantasies, suicide. Romeo & Juliet? Sex, disobedience. Othello? Interracial sex.

You want to police what other people's kids are allowed to read?

Do you even know what grooming is? A book on a bookshelf ain't it.

Dattier said:

Slippery slope? Yawn.

School librarians make professional decisions based on discretion and merit. I'm going to respectfully trust that you actually know the difference between visual pornography and an explicit text.

Click to expand...

He said "why stop there?" Indicating that he is aware of the difference that you speak of. So where does it stop for you, datt. What crosses the line in your opinion?

How many deep we go is dependent upon the score.

We might play 10 in the first half but if the game is only say an 8 point spread with 10 minutes to go, we’re playing no more than 8.

KDSTONE said:

Why stop there? Put Hustler and Penthouse in middle school libraries and let the kids and parents decide. Do you even hear yourself?

Click to expand...

Slippery slope? Yawn.

School librarians make professional decisions based on discretion and merit. I'm going to respectfully trust that you actually know the difference between visual pornography and an explicit text.

Dattier said:

I said there's a wide range of development between the kid in your video and the oldest kids in the school.
I said it is between a kid and their parents what the kid reads.
I said it's no parent's right to decide what other people's kids get to read.

It's not grooming. Not at all.

I didn't weigh in on the book whatsoever.

Is it acceptable for this book to be in a public library? A bookstore? What's the difference between an 11-year-old activist seeking it out there?

Click to expand...

It is not appropriate or acceptable for it to be available for anyone under the age of 18 to be able to get it from a public library, let alone a school library. Book stores shouldn't be able to sell it to minors. A book meant for minors about minors participating in sexual acts between two boys is 100% grooming. Sick fvcks.

The way Scheyer is recruiting both HS players and transfers, I don't think he's worried about losing someone because they didn't play enough. Like Chris says, Scheyer wants to win now.

GhostOf301 said:

These people are sick. To justify a book portraying boys giving each other blowjobs, he says that there are 14 year olds in that school as well. As if it is appropriate for 14 year olds. But there's no grooming going on, not at all.

Click to expand...

I said there's a wide range of development between the kid in your video and the oldest kids in the school.
I said it is between a kid and their parents what the kid reads.
I said it's no parent's right to decide what other people's kids get to read.

It's not grooming. Not at all.

I didn't weigh in on the book whatsoever.

Is it acceptable for this book to be in a public library? A bookstore? What's the difference between an 11-year-old activist seeking it out there?

We are living in the era of college basketball where we just need to expect that top programs will lose their top 5-7 players to the draft or transfer and reload the following year. We are going to see some players leave and shake our heads. It happens. The anomalies are few and far between....see Proctor. I agree with Mac, it's about winning THIS year, and figure next year out after this year. Kids have lots of influencers guiding them, for better or worse.

Will we see a deep bench this year? It seems we ask that most years. Under K I would be very skeptical. I will admit that this particular year sure does seem like a year where we could go 10 deep. But the reality is that it goes against the grain of every Duke season in the past 25+ years.

With that said, I do think this team is special and is oozing potential perhaps more than any in recent history. Barring injury or serious dissent in the locker room, I really think this is a very strong national championship contender. Won't be easy, nothing is certain, but the parts are all there. We have top recruits, a couple veterans, and some beast transfers. Dang it's good to be a Duke fan.

KDSTONE said:

So you’re cool with an 11 year old reading that? Good to know.

Click to expand...

I said no such thing.
It's not my call. Is it your call?

KDSTONE said:

So you’re cool with an 11 year old reading that? Good to know.

Click to expand...

These people are sick. To justify a book portraying boys giving each other blowjobs, he says that there are 14 year olds in that school as well. As if it is appropriate for 14 year olds. But there's no grooming going on, not at all.

pinecreek said:

At first glance I’m a bit worried about how to play everyone. Give the freshman enough burn to come back for next year. Only 3 recruits so far. At least 3 players will be gone off current roster. Maybe return about 7 guys, add the freshman and no need for too many transfers.
Play the 5 th year guys enough to see what they can do but since they will be leaving anyway don’t waste okaying time on them until the ACCT.

Click to expand...

This can’t work. There are no guarantees anymore. A kid could play 15-18 minutes a game and still leave. It’s all about winning now.

Login to view embedded media
The Mack has arrived. He plays them like fiddles.

Dattier said:

From the same crowd who says "thoughts and prayers" after every school shooting and won't support any common sense gun laws.

The kid is 11 and he is at a middle school, which means he's in 6th grade, and that there are 14-year-old 8th graders at the same school. That's a wide range of development. Whether that kid reads that book or not is a decision to be made between him and his parents. It is not their decision what other kids read. And it's available in the school library. It's not required reading in their ELA class.

The availability of a book is not indoctrination.

Click to expand...

So you’re cool with an 11 year old reading that? Good to know.

Dattier said:

From the same crowd who says "thoughts and prayers" after every school shooting and won't support any common sense gun laws.

The kid is 11 and he is at a middle school, which means he's in 6th grade, and that there are 14-year-old 8th graders at the same school. That's a wide range of development. Whether that kid reads that book or not is a decision to be made between him and his parents. It is not their decision what other kids read. And it's available in the school library. It's not required reading in their ELA class.

The availability of a book is not indoctrination.

Click to expand...

Why stop there? Put Hustler and Penthouse in middle school libraries and let the kids and parents decide. Do you even hear yourself?

Dattier said:

From the same crowd who says "thoughts and prayers" after every school shooting and won't support any common sense gun laws.

The kid is 11 and he is at a middle school, which means he's in 6th grade, and that there are 14-year-old 8th graders at the same school. That's a wide range of development. Whether that kid reads that book or not is a decision to be made between him and his parents. It is not their decision what other kids read. And it's available in the school library. It's not required reading in their ELA class.

The availability of a book is not indoctrination.

Click to expand...

Disgusting person.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Another#1Dukie said:

Absolutely disgusting. The fact there are adults and TEACHERS supporting that crap is beyond disturbing.

Leave the F'n kids alone! As the man in the video said, there shouldn't be any sexualized books gay, straight whatever.
This is indoctrination plain and simple.

Click to expand...

From the same crowd who says "thoughts and prayers" after every school shooting and won't support any common sense gun laws.

The kid is 11 and he is at a middle school, which means he's in 6th grade, and that there are 14-year-old 8th graders at the same school. That's a wide range of development. Whether that kid reads that book or not is a decision to be made between him and his parents. It is not their decision what other kids read. And it's available in the school library. It's not required reading in their ELA class.

The availability of a book is not indoctrination.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.