Interesting, aah555. Thanks for posting that. That's not at all how I remember the scuttlebutt after Trey's freshman year, but it sounds like he was all but gone.
Nevertheless, I think the point stands that Tyus's perceived NBA weaknesses are basically threefold, height, athleticism/defense, and his shooting is only decent, not great. These were the same criticisms of Trey. And with both, the height and athleticism weren't getting any better with another year in school (Trey staying for a junior year, Tyus for a sophomore year). Both had great runs in the tourney. Both had improved draft value because of it. Both made the right decisions getting out when they did, even if another year in college might have made them a bit more prepared for an NBA season/career.
I actually heard a lot more UM fans saying [in my opinion, ignorantly] that Trey should have stayed for another year than I'm hearing Duke fans saying Tyus should have stayed. I wonder if that's because Tyus actually won the NC or because Duke fans are more aware of the realities of the NBA and draft position, in that Duke has multiple guys drafted nearly every year?