Sheyduke, not much to argue with your stance on when and how officers use their weapons. The only thing that you have said that threw me sideways is that restraint has nothing to do with it. It is of my opinion that restraint has everything to do with it. When you talk of felony stops, that is a situation where the officers are prepared prior to exiting the vehicle. Not all situations that involve the use of weapons present themselves prior to an officer walking up to the subject's window. But we've spoken on this issue and there is no need to beat a dead horse. Following procedure, as you have said, is crucial. But I also don't have a problem with the officers doing what they feel is necessary in each individual circumstance as long as they use restraint and do not cross the line. This is nothing further than my opinion and as they say. We all have one.
I agree with your position on the Nolan Smith situation. I just don't appreciate his motives, but at the same time, I do not know 100% what his motives were, I just believe I do.
As far as my knowledge of the field. I do have a degree in criminal justice, I do not have any experience as a cop. In fact, you as a cop might not like my former line of work. I was an investigator for the DA's office for 6 years. Some of the cases I worked involved officers who were accused of using excessive force. And I will say that the majority of those cases involved people who had their feelings hurt more than their rights violated. I also worked cases where cops who went beyond their line of duty to serve the people of their community and still got forced to resign over poor decisions. As bad things happen to good people, good people have been known to do bad things.
My brother has been a cop for over 20 years. He currently is part of a gang resistance unit and he does his job mostly on foot in the projects. Obviously he would have a more supported opinion than mine, but I have seen what goes on and base my opinions off of that.