To paint a general picture, the One and Done "era" started in 2006 when the draft rules changed. 2007-2009 were the darkest 3 years I can remember as a Duke fan, we were outmatched talent wise and fell short in the tournament every year, we weren't landing any top recruits, and UNC was dominating us. Obviously in 2010 everything came together, our young guys turned into veterans and we won the title, that was awesome.I agree to some degree, but I have no problem with a kid who comes to Duke, who is, say, a top 30-50 ranked recruit but not a one and done, and he keeps seeing one and done players recruited over him and never gets any playing time for 2-3 years. I think that’s a deeper problem at Duke. You don’t see a whole lot of that at schools that our top 20 programs but get very few want it done players, they simply develop those guys and they stay three or four years. I think Duke would be better suited to try to get one top recruit a year and have a bunch of third and four year players getting minutes and playing alongside the player. The program would do better, make more NCAA runs, with fewer transfers because a freshman who is a 35th ranked player and comes to Duke will have some confidence that if he works hard, by his second or third year he’ll be getting significant minutes and playing time. I think we need fewer players like a Jalen Johnson and fewer top 10 recruits in a given year in general. They aren’t going to lead Duke to a title, they don’t have the maturity and don’t play defense or understand team defense concepts; all they are going to do is interest more one and done types who see Duke as merely a steppingstone to get some notoriety and become a lottery pick. That hurts the program, it makes for a poorer product on the basketball court, and rarely leads to an exciting NCAA tournament for the program.
in fact, if I were Coach K, I would tell a top 10 recruit that we want you, but you’re not gonna play 35 minutes a game and take all the minutes away from a 50th ranked player who is a junior or senior. You’re going have to learn to play defense, and be a team player.
It’s having two or three one and done types to take all the minutes that hurt the program and hurt college basketball as a whole.
However, what's funny, K essentially attempted your formula up until 2015. 2011 our only OAD was Kyrie. 2012 was Rivers. 2013 we actually missed on all top guys but had Sulaimon as our only 5 star. 2014 was Parker. We fell short every single year, and 2012/2014 we were the laughingstock of the tournament. It's just not that easy, what if you miss on your top target? Once one guy commits are we just supposed to tell the other guys to go somewhere else? Seems hard.
I don't have an answer to our struggles this year. What I can say, is that in 2012 UK won the title by taking as many talented guys as they could, and we won in 2015 with this same method. The Zion team was better than Virginia who won the title. There are only 2 schools doing this method (Duke and UK) and each won a title in the last 10 years, that is MUCH more efficient than 50 other major programs with most having 0 titles to show for it. I don't think K needs to make a drastic change to the program, other than lets only recruit guys who want to be at Duke, whether it's for 1 year or 4. What will also make our program much better is to return "fringe" guys, Cassius Stanley sure would make us better this year. Let's hope Steward and Moore stick around next year and see what happens, because it seems like Baldwin isn't coming to Duke.
Last edited: