ADVERTISEMENT

The New Lounge

Critical thinking skills expose conservative students to viewpoints beyond their own. Conservative students are more likely to come from less diverse areas, rural areas, religious backgrounds, and to have narrower experiences. All of that breeds rigidity. Being exposed to new information is the goal of every single class in the history of classes. For rigid people, that feels threatening. They prefer their conservative bubble.

So broadly, those complaints are largely snowflakes whining that they've been presented with info that challenges their biases. I won't rule out the existence of such professors, of course, though I think they're rarer than you think. I doubt you're willing to concede as much because you're one of the rigid.

At last count, there are two liberals who post here regularly. If you think we're the primary perpetrators of harassment and name-calling, you're dumber than I knew.
How about the professors keep their political opinions to themselves? It has no relevance in an engineering or accounting class. As far as the humanities and liberal arts go, it seems more in place, but you still run up against the whole captive audience thing. Unethical to use their taxpayer funded position to influence someone else’s political beliefs. Somewhat different at a private school
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192

The New Lounge

Critical thinking skills expose conservative students to viewpoints beyond their own. Conservative students are more likely to come from less diverse areas, rural areas, religious backgrounds, and to have narrower experiences. All of that breeds rigidity. Being exposed to new information is the goal of every single class in the history of classes. For rigid people, that feels threatening. They prefer their conservative bubble.

So broadly, those complaints are largely snowflakes whining that they've been presented with info that challenges their biases. I won't rule out the existence of such professors, of course, though I think they're rarer than you think. I doubt you're willing to concede as much because you're one of the rigid.

At last count, there are two liberals who post here regularly. If you think we're the primary perpetrators of harassment and name-calling, you're dumber than I knew.
Yet it’s liberal students who freak out every time a conservative is scheduled to speak on their campus. Frequent cancel culture in action. You and the other one only tolerate our presence because you’re outnumbered on this board. If ever you Leftists gained the majority here, as well as the mod spots, we’d be banned every other week.
  • Like
Reactions: Mac9192

The New Lounge

Critical thinking skills expose conservative students to viewpoints beyond their own. Conservative students are more likely to come from less diverse areas, rural areas, religious backgrounds, and to have narrower experiences. All of that breeds rigidity. Being exposed to new information is the goal of every single class in the history of classes. For rigid people, that feels threatening. They prefer their conservative bubble.

So broadly, those complaints are largely snowflakes whining that they've been presented with info that challenges their biases. I won't rule out the existence of such professors, of course, though I think they're rarer than you think. I doubt you're willing to concede as much because you're one of the rigid.

At last count, there are two liberals who post here regularly. If you think we're the primary perpetrators of harassment and name-calling, you're dumber than I knew.
Chock full of stereotypes and name calling. Your stock in trade.

The New Lounge

Universities are echo chambers now and conservative students often complain about pressure to conform to their professor’s viewpoint. Like with free speech, critical thinking skills are championed until these skills lead to an unpopular conclusion. Then the harassment and name calling starts. Not unlike this message board
Critical thinking skills expose conservative students to viewpoints beyond their own. Conservative students are more likely to come from less diverse areas, rural areas, religious backgrounds, and to have narrower experiences. All of that breeds rigidity. Being exposed to new information is the goal of every single class in the history of classes. For rigid people, that feels threatening. They prefer their conservative bubble.

So broadly, those complaints are largely snowflakes whining that they've been presented with info that challenges their biases. I won't rule out the existence of such professors, of course, though I think they're rarer than you think. I doubt you're willing to concede as much because you're one of the rigid.

At last count, there are two liberals who post here regularly. If you think we're the primary perpetrators of harassment and name-calling, you're dumber than I knew.

The New Lounge

All the Dems get leniency like Robert Byrd. Republicans not so much.
Sen Byrd famously renounced his brief membership in the KKK for years.

While data on Republican and Democratic historians is available, I focused on conservative and liberal, which aren't inherently the same.

President Jackson is certainly a darling of conservatives, whatever his political party was. Washington and Jefferson were both top 5 for liberal historians despite having owned slaves.

It seems like you're just looking for a fight. All I did was present facts and reasonable analysis.

duke football news

Hart, I'm afraid former players don't have a vote on who plays QB for Duke.

I don't understand if Belin is #2 on the depth chart, why he isn't getting some reps. I assume Manny and his staff are seeing great things in practice that we haven't seen yet, which merits having a stationary QB playing in a sport that almost requires a mobile QB.
Wow, thanks for the scoop Lift!!
🙄

I don't think staff is necessarily seeing "great things" from Belin. He's simply thought of as a "packages"qb at this point in special situations.

OFC

duke football news

There is no rule that says a player has to be a freshman to get the 4-game maximum redshirt rule. That's why N.C. State's QB last year, MJ Morris, bailed after playing in his 4 games. It's how Wake Forest bought Sam Hartman an extra season (that wound up using at ND), by only playing him in 4 games in 2019 after he started 9 games in 2018.

So, yes, IF the plan is to redshirt Grayson Loftis, he can play in 4 regular-season games plus any postseason game(s) -- that is actually a rule change this year -- and not lose a season of eligibility.
Conor MANY THANKS for this very valued info. OFC
  • Like
Reactions: ConorONeill

duke football news

Hart, I'm afraid former players don't have a vote on who plays QB for Duke.

I don't understand if Belin is #2 on the depth chart, why he isn't getting some reps. I assume Manny and his staff are seeing great things in practice that we haven't seen yet, which merits having a stationary QB playing in a sport that almost requires a mobile QB.

duke football news

Scuttlebut: Anybody hearing what's making the rounds on some other Duke message boards: a majority of Ex-Duke players feel Grayson Loftis is THE BEST qb on Duke's roster??

Also for @ConorONeill. Conor I know this applies to True Freshman.but since LOFTIS IS REDSHIRTED, Can he play in up to four games, and still not burn his redshirt?? Thanks in advance.

OFC
There is no rule that says a player has to be a freshman to get the 4-game maximum redshirt rule. That's why N.C. State's QB last year, MJ Morris, bailed after playing in his 4 games. It's how Wake Forest bought Sam Hartman an extra season (that wound up using at ND), by only playing him in 4 games in 2019 after he started 9 games in 2018.

So, yes, IF the plan is to redshirt Grayson Loftis, he can play in 4 regular-season games plus any postseason game(s) -- that is actually a rule change this year -- and not lose a season of eligibility.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT