The New Lounge
- By GhostOf301
- Duke Hoops Open Forum - Free
- 18160 Replies
Australia would be all the examples you would need. Last rime I speak on this.When has it ever, ever, EVER, EVAAAAAAR crossed the line into taking away law-abiding citizens' guns? Don't waste time with this; just give a single, simple example.
You ignored Sen Vance's lie in order to focus on VP Harris' misuse of a direct quote. You think it's the first quarter and I'm already halfway through the victory parade in the Super Bowl of proving you're a hypocrite.
She did indeed misrepresent the context in which Sen Vance said those poorly chosen exact words. (For her to have done so deliberately means she understood the original context, which means she must be smarter than any conservative here ever gives her credit, but I digress...) If you want to call her hypocritical for that, fine. (Of course, that would be setting a higher bar for her than you have for yourself, which is further evidence of your hypocrisy. It's like hypocrisy squared now, but I disgress...)
You're basically equivocating how she misused an exact quote with "masks and vaccines are bad for you" or "there's no such thing as being transgender." 🤣
Sen Vance is indeed a heartless PO[initial representing naughty word redacted since I've been banned for using abbreviations for naughty words before, but I digress...]. Still no evidence of death threats to Sen Vance as a result of this "misinformation"? Don't waste time with this; just give a single, simple example.
You can say that Vance lied when he said that Harris wants to take your guns. Even if it is a lie, it has absolutely nothing to do with what the real issue is here. So AGAIN, this does not make me a hypocrite for ignoring something irrelevant to the discussion. You failed again.
The mask and vaccine paragraph is weird. I don't follow.
Shit, datt. Just say shit. This is a safe place. Even for you. The mods have told you directly that you would not be banned and yet you still constantly whine about your supposed ban for using an acronym. Not surprising from the spokesperson for victimhood. As far as the death threats. What I should have said was death wishes. The tweets I was reading wouldn't be considered actual threats as they weren't saying they would do anything. Just that they wished someone would. So accept my correction or say that I was lying. I don't care.
Can you play by the rules for one second here and stick to the topic? Can you explain to me how what Harris did here is any different than what she wants to use the DOJ to go after social media sites for allowing people to do?