It’s curious that the Dem Party who claim “it’s all about the children” when trying to justify exorbitant spending bills is the same party that seemingly has no issue with 300k migrant children’s unknown whereabouts or little girls having to share bathrooms with mentally unstable men. Very odd
The New Lounge
- Thread starter hpnole
- Start date
He's also too dense to realize voters voted against all this silly talk. There's much bigger issues than allowing John to become Juanita.
Ol Diddlier likes to think highly of himself and his self righteous beliefs.
This whole thing is really head scratching. We must protect women at all cost, believe everything they say, put them in positions of power to take away the patriarchy. UNLESS it's a man that dresses up and pretends to be a woman. LMFAO....you just can't make it up.
History has shown that the masses are ignorant for the most part. They fell for the Republicans’ “ hysterical grandstanding”. Only a select few can become truly enlightened like Dattier
LOL....it's F'n hilarious to me how the libs are still debating how they lost so bad to "Orange Man". It's like they can't see their own two feet. You lost b/c the majority of of Americans wants closed boarders, a good enconomy and men out of women's bathrooms and sports. I mean, those are the 3 most easily to identify. The overarching thing is that American citizens do not believe in the woke doctrine and agenda. The libs just can't see that though.
It is odd, but these poor souls are very predictable. They are told what to care for, what to be outraged about, who to blame.....
Did voters voted against this specifically, or are there much bigger issues? It's not both.
And if there are much bigger issues, Rep Mace is grandstanding, like I said.
AOC crying over Trump’s kids in cages, facilities in place while Obama was Pres.
That’s what hysterical grandstanding actually looks like
It’s also predictable that Datt would ignore the migrant children issue I addressed and stay focused on the trans issue, one clearly near and dear to his heart
For 4 years y'all cried about references to President Trump. Now you're going back to his first term, more than 4 years ago, and more than 8 years ago to President Obama.
Children in cages is a far bigger deal than where the only transgender member of the House pees.
Enough of this garbage talk. We have a new sheriff in charge. One that is competent and has a set of testicles. If I'm right Datt, brace yourself. You might be in for the ride of your life. Changes are hopefully coming. We've been long overdue.
I would imagine children being sex trafficked or working slave labor under Biden/ Harris would prefer being detained
We all know the dems don't care about children.... Unless they're trying to implement some gun control, policy.
Fair enough. The changes I would like to see are beyond whoever is in the White House. President Trump always has and always will thrive on division. Until his cult-like followers reject that, we're unlikely to see any change we all benefit from.
Well, you've already stated that you don't believe the left has been radical enough IYO. So obviously this won't be the white house that brings the kind of changes you would like to see. What's amusing is you calling Trump's followers cult-like. The blue no matter who crowd is by far the biggest cult-like following there is. They will conform to anything their leaders perpetuate without the slightest bit of hesitation. Oddly enough, Trump offered republican voters a way out of being cult-like followers of their political party. Whether it is a grift or not, we'll see. Though there are definitely Trumpers who obsessively follow him and worship him to the point of being cult-like, the majority of his voting base are just burned out by business as usual politics and find him to be someone who gives them hope in reform. As to whether he delivers on that, also, we'll see.
Last edited:
